The lack of protection against electromagnetic pulse (EMP) weapons at the Ministry of National Defense’s (MND) new headquarters is “irresponsible” and could endanger Taiwan, a Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmaker said yesterday.
Senior military leaders told the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) that the buildings under construction in Taipei’s Dazhi (大直) would not be outfitted with EMP countermeasures as planned because of budget problems.
The NT$200 million (US$6.9 million) system was scrapped despite comprising just 1.3 percent of the facility’s total construction budget and the NT$84 million already invested in the system, the Liberty Times quoted sources as saying, adding that the military was not happy.
Photo: Chang Chia-ming, Taipei Times
The information comes amid news that China has been developing EMP weapons in the event of a conflict with Taiwan.
EMP weapons can be used to emit a huge pulse of electromagnetic radiation that can knock out all electronics — particularly computers — over a widespread area.
“The Ministry of National Defense should have built the protection regardless of its budgetary concerns,” DPP Legislator Tsai Huang-liang (蔡煌瑯) said.
“Without it, it is like a soldier going to a battlefield not carrying a gun. Our whole military network could be completely taken offline,” Tsai said.
The long-delayed headquarters complex has been under construction since 2003. Originally envisioned to be a state-of-the-art facility, the construction process has been plagued by contractor problems, including a bankruptcy, leading to a Control Yuan probe.
The report about the lack of an EMP shield could trigger new questions over the practicality of the NT$15.8 billion project.
Military analysts believe that China could be planning to cause a massive low-altitude EMP burst over Taiwan in the event of an armed conflict in such a way that would severely damage electronics — disabling weapons systems — but kill few people and not impact China.
That scenario was detailed by a 2005 National Ground Intelligence Center report declassified earlier this month. China’s EMP capability could be used as a surprise measure after an initial strike to help dissuade the US from intervening, the report said.
Ministry spokesperson Colonel Lo Shao-ho (羅紹和) told the Liberty Times that the decision to drop EMP protection was made four years ago after changes to the building’s design increased construction costs. However, the NT$84 million already invested in the system meant it could be added at a later point, he said.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lin Yu-fang (林郁方) said the system should be put in place now, given the concerns raised by the recently released intelligence report.
“It should be finished,” Lin said. “One EMP blast could immediately knock out any product using a power transformer, including computers and other electronics ... it would be too late to deal with the aftereffects.”
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s