A small group of people protested in front of the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) yesterday, demanding that the truth about the death of a Taiwanese ship captain during a firefight between a US Navy ship and Somali pirates be made public and that the US compensate the captain’s family.
Wu Lai-yu (吳來于), captain of the Jih Chun Tsai No. 68, which was hijacked by pirates off the coast of Somalia in March last year and was used as a mothership, died on May 10 during a NATO anti-piracy mission carried out by the USS Stephen W. Groves.
Washington has yet to account for how the gunfight began and how Wu was killed, only saying that a team from the US warship found Wu and three pirates dead when it boarded the vessel. The US also confirmed that Wu was buried at sea.
Photo: Wang Yi-sung, Taipei Times
Dozens of protesters representing the Human Rights Association for Taiwan Fishermen, the Labor Party and the Chung Hwa Baodiao Alliance protested to condemn the US for “killing the captain” and “destroying the corpse and obliterating the evidence.”
“The US hasn’t offered an apology, nor has it made any mention of compensation, which is why we are here today,” Labor Party -Secretary-General Tang Shu (唐曙) said.
Tang said Wu “was not killed by mistake,” but that it was a case of “an innocent civilian -slaughtered” by the US Navy, an act Tang said was “in violation of the principles for humanitarian rescue operations.”
“It’s outrageous that the US brazenly killed a hostage in international waters,” Tang said.
The protesters demanded the US publicly apologize to Wu’s family, provide compensation for losses — including Wu’s death and the sinking of the ship — and that the US allow Taiwanese officials to participate in an investigation into the accident.
A final request was that the US urge Japan to grant Taiwanese fishing rights in the disputed Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台).
“It was because Japan prevented Taiwanese fishermen from operating in the waters surrounding the Diaoyutai Islands that Wu had sailed a long way to dangerous waters off eastern Africa to earn a living,” Human Rights Association for Taiwan Fishermen director Hsiao Wen-yi (蕭文義) said.
US support for Japan’s claim to the Diaoyutai Islands and the inclusion of the disputed waters in the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the US and Japan has resulted in Japan’s arbitrary denial of Taiwanese fishermen’s right to operate there, Hsiao said.
The protest lasted about an hour, with demonstrators chanting slogans and delivering statements to AIT spokesperson Sheila Paskman, who came out to receive them.
Talking to representatives of the groups, Paskman said the AIT was aware that the matter was important and needed to be resolved.
Paskman said the AIT would contact the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as soon as it obtained new information about the incident from the US government.
Ecoterra International, an international NGO, said that on April 24, the USS Stephen W. Groves, operating as part of NATO’s counter-piracy mission, had fired upon and destroyed two unmanned pirate skiffs towed by the Jih Chun Tsai No. 68 while it was attached to the hijacked Italian bulker Rosalia’s Amato.
The military action by the US Navy has been described by Ecoterro as an “ill-conceived” and “botched” naval attack because it “endangered hostages in the first place” and was not followed by legal procedures to try the surviving pirates, whom NATO said in a statement have been returned to Somalia.
Also cast into doubt by Ecoterro was whether the US Navy was authorized to attack the pirate convoy.
“While trying to get information if the US naval attack against this pirated convoy was authorized by the vessel owner and/or the Italian government, we received first reports which clearly indicate that neither the Italian government nor the vessel owner had authorized any military action and as a matter of fact the navies were only requested to observe the vessel while it was commandeered to Somalia. Apparently the navies and especially NATO have been given firm instructions to stand down and to not wage any military action,” Ecoterro reported on May 20.
In an e-mail reply to the Taipei Times regarding the operation, AIT spokesperson Christopher Kavanagh said: “All at-sea counter-piracy engagements are designed to avoid casualties. We do not, however, discuss the details of specific counter-piracy operations.”
“Under international law, all states, including the United States, have a duty to cooperate in repressing piracy. Generally, a warship has the right under international law to board any vessel reasonably suspected of engaging in piracy,” Kavanagh said.
He said the US Department of Defense was undergoing a “factual review” of the circumstances surrounding Wu’s death.
The AIT provided some additional information about the Jih Chun Tsai No. 68 and Wu to the ministry over the weekend, he said.
“As we receive more details, we will share them with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,” he said.
Bruce Linghu (令狐榮達), the director-general of the ministry’s Department of North American Affairs, confirmed to the Taipei Times that the AIT had provided more information to the ministry, but that it was not a final investigation report.
‘NO SECURITY RISK’: The Railway Bureau reassured the public that the technicians’ activities were limited to technical guidance and did not involve sensitive systems The Railway Bureau yesterday said it had invited eight Chinese technicians to assist with an airport MRT construction project. The bureau issued the confirmation after an Internet user said Chinese nationals had entered the construction zone of Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport’s Terminal 3 project. They asked why “individuals from an enemy state” were allowed access to such a major national infrastructure project, which raised serious concerns over Taiwan’s industrial safety, sensitive systems and information security. The bureau’s Northern Region Engineering Branch Office said subcontractor Taiwan Handle Industrial Co (台灣手把工業) of the Taoyuan airport MRT’s “Contract No. CU05 Project A14 Station Civil, MEP &
The National Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology yesterday showcased its locally developed variants of the Vision 60 robotic patrol dog, which it plans to deploy on the nation’s outlying territories in the South China Sea. The variants were produced under the Joint Lab project — created by the institute and domestic companies — and assembled with domestically produced motors, lenses and artificial intelligence (AI) systems alongside licensed tech from the US, Missile and Rocket Systems Research Division deputy director Jen Kuo-kang (任國光) told the media event at a military base in Taipei’s Dazhi (大直) area. Taiwan has built up its strengths
RIGHT DIRECTION: Taiwan’s efforts to prevent forced labor include a proposal to ‘fully prohibit’ employers from withholding workers’ documents, an official said Taiwan is to establish a mechanism to restrict imports of goods linked to forced labor, the Executive Yuan said yesterday, after the US proposed imposing additional tariffs on Taiwanese goods over labor concerns. “The Ministry of Labor and the Ministry of Economic Affairs are to establish an interministerial review procedure,” Executive Yuan spokesperson Michelle Lee (李慧芝) said at a news briefing in Taipei. “The government is to use the Foreign Trade Act [貿易法] as the legal basis to restrict imports of goods produced with forced labor” and bring its supply chain governance more in line with international standards on human rights, resilience
NOT IMMEDIATE: Taiwan has a chance to appeal the proposed 10 percent tariff before it starts, while other countries face a 12.5 percent tariff from the trade office Taiwan is among 60 economies determined by the US to have failed to impose or enforce a ban on the importation of goods produced with forced labor, according to a notice released on Tuesday by the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR), which proposed imposing an additional 10 percent or more tariff on them. The USTR in a statement said that following an investigation, it had determined under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 that the failure of the 60 economies to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor is