A high level conference on Chinese defense and security issues was told on Thursday that if the US fails to sell advanced F-16C/D fighter aircraft to Taiwan it will send a signal to Beijing that Washington is no longer fully committed to defending Taiwan.
“If we allow the F-16 decision to just lapse, to never happen — and there will never be a good time to do it — we are at risk of appearing to downgrade the Taiwan Relations Act and to upgrade the Chinese interpretation of the Third Communique,” former US National Security Council (NSC) member Michael Green said.
Green, a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said that while the F-16s would not be a “game changer” in terms of the war fighting status, their sale to Taipei would have great importance.
US President Barack Obama is currently considering a Taiwanese request — strongly opposed by China — for 66 of the advanced fighters to modernize its air force.
A decision is expected later this year.
Green and other China experts were asked if the US military could reach Taiwan in time to help defend the nation in the case of a Chinese attack, and if the US was still able to “cope” with China’s new anti-access weapons.
He replied: “Before we think about scenarios for war fighting, we need to think about how we strengthen deterrence and dissuasion and complicate Chinese planning so that we don’t get there.”
Green told the Washington conference, organized by the Jamestown Foundation, that the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) area denial and anti-access strategies would complicate US intervention in a Taiwan crisis, but that the US military would still be effective.
“We can still do what we need to do. What we should be thinking about is how do we complicate PLA planning? How do we make it difficult for the PLA to go into the leadership and say: ‘We can win this one boss,’” he said.
Green said that the US needed to demonstrate to China that there were consequences for its behavior.
He said that he could sympathize with his successors at the council — who now have to help Obama decide about the F16 sale — because it was far from being an easy task.
“It will challenge our diplomacy with Beijing,” Green said.
“But if we let this slip, we are de facto in danger of changing Chinese calculations about our commitment,” he added.
“You must prevent war before the crisis comes. That is what is most important. If you wait until the crisis comes, conflict will break out. It is harder to solve,” said Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Shuai Hua-ming (帥化民), a retired general who now serves on the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee.
Earlier, Arthur Waldron, a professor of International Relations at the University of Pennsylvania, said that relations between the US and China and between China and some of its regional neighbors had changed.
“We have passed a toll barrier, a watershed, something is different now. Something has changed in China, but we don’t know what it really is. Something is definitely going on and we don’t have a handle on it,” he said.
Waldron said that China thought of itself as the “No. 1” country and did not have the Western concept of equal states.
“Regardless of what they say, there is a deeply rooted cultural assumption that the world is hierarchal, and that by all rights China should be at the top and the other states arrayed down the hierarchy,” Waldron said.
“If you are the top country, you have to discipline those below, otherwise they will throw you off your palm tree. In international relations, the Chinese use force regularly. They never use force as the sole instrument, they don’t have a separation of political and military policy. Conditions for the use of force are very carefully prepared. An environment is created by statements, by incidents short of force, by a stress on grievances, by arguments,” he added.
When force was used, the Chinese wanted it to be “almost instantaneously decisive,” Waldron said.
“What I worry about most is that for a variety of cultural reasons, one of these incidents could trigger a situation which would then get out of control in a way that neither the Chinese nor the rest of us would want,” he said.
Assistant US Secretary of State for East Asia and Pacific Affairs Kurt Campbell delivered an off-the-record keynote address to the conference.
While it was not possible under the rules to report on the speech, sources said that Campbell did not deal with issues directly involving Taiwan.
RESPONSE: The transit sends a message that China’s alignment with other countries would not deter the West from defending freedom of navigation, an academic said Canadian frigate the Ville de Quebec and Australian guided-missile destroyer the Brisbane transited the Taiwan Strait yesterday morning, the first time the two nations have conducted a joint freedom of navigation operation. The Canadian and Australian militaries did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The Ministry of National Defense declined to confirm the passage, saying only that Taiwan’s armed forces had deployed surveillance and reconnaissance assets, along with warships and combat aircraft, to safeguard security across the Strait. The two vessels were observed transiting northward along the eastern side of the Taiwan Strait’s median line, with Japan being their most likely destination,
‘NOT ALONE’: A Taiwan Strait war would disrupt global trade routes, and could spark a worldwide crisis, so a powerful US presence is needed as a deterrence, a US senator said US Senator Deb Fischer on Thursday urged her colleagues in the US Congress to deepen Washington’s cooperation with Taiwan and other Indo-Pacific partners to contain the global security threat from China. Fischer and other lawmakers recently returned from an official trip to the Indo-Pacific region, where they toured US military bases in Hawaii and Guam, and visited leaders, including President William Lai (賴清德). The trip underscored the reality that the world is undergoing turmoil, and maintaining a free and open Indo-Pacific region is crucial to the security interests of the US and its partners, she said. Her visit to Taiwan demonstrated ways the
GLOBAL ISSUE: If China annexes Taiwan, ‘it will not stop its expansion there, as it only becomes stronger and has more force to expand further,’ the president said China’s military and diplomatic expansion is not a sole issue for Taiwan, but one that risks world peace, President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday, adding that Taiwan would stand with the alliance of democratic countries to preserve peace through deterrence. Lai made the remark in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (sister paper of the Taipei Times). “China is strategically pushing forward to change the international order,” Lai said, adding that China established the Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank, launched the Belt and Road Initiative, and pushed for yuan internationalization, because it wants to replace the democratic rules-based international
WAR’S END ANNIVERSARY: ‘Taiwan does not believe in commemorating peace by holding guns,’ the president said on social media after attending a morning ceremony Countries should uphold peace, and promote freedom and democracy, President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday as Taiwan marked 80 years since the end of World War II and the Second Sino-Japanese War. Lai, Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) and other top officials in the morning attended a ceremony at the National Revolutionary Martyrs’ Shrine in Taipei’s Zhongshan District (中山) to honor those who sacrificed their lives in major battles. “Taiwanese are peace-loving. Taiwan does not believe in commemorating peace by holding guns,” Lai wrote on Facebook afterward, apparently to highlight the contrast with the military parade in Beijing marking the same anniversary. “We
RSS