Sun, Jan 09, 2011 - Page 1 News List

Republicans aim to stifle climate change action

THREE PRONGS:In just the first day of the new US congressional session, the Republicans introduced bills to limit the Environmental Protection Agency’s powers


Republicans in the US Congress have wasted no time in using their new majority in the US House of Representatives to try to block the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to act on climate change.

In their first full day in the new Congress, Republicans outlined three different bills — encapsulating three different strategies — aimed at limiting the powers of the EPA. It also shut down a House committee that had tackled energy and climate issues.

The first, introduced by Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, would declare that greenhouse gas emissions are not subject to the Clean Air Act — even though the US Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that they are.

The second, introduced by Ted Poe of Texas, would block funding to any government agency associated with cap-and-trade.

The third, introduced by Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, is relatively modest, seeking a two-year delay in EPA regulation of carbon dioxide and methane emissions.

However, that could make it the most likely to succeed. In the Senate, a Democrat from coal-rich West Virginia, Jay Rockefeller, has been calling for a bill to delay EPA action on climate change.


The EPA began the process of regulating greenhouse gas emissions under new rules for major power plants and oil refineries that went into effect this month.

However, as November’s mid-term elections made clear, environmental regulations have become a favorite target of the conservative Tea party movement.

In an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal, Fred Upton, the Michigan Republican who will lead the energy and commerce committee, teamed up with Tim Phillips, who is seen as a driving force behind the Tea Party groups, to call the EPA moves toward regulation a job killer and unconstitutional power-grab.

Republicans have also shut down the select committee for energy independence and global warming, which was created by former House speaker Nancy Pelosi in 2006. It had tackled issues from the politicization of climate science to the BP oil spill.


Meanwhile, Republican Darrell Issa, who is head of the powerful new House committee on oversight and government reform, has been reaching out to oil company executives, business lobbyists and conservative think tanks asking which government regulations they find the most irksome. Most of the companies on Issa’s list have been heavy contributors to the Republican party and several reportedly supported overturning environmental regulations.

In a sign of the battles to come, Barbara Boxer, the California Democrat who leads the Senate environment committee said on Thursday she would use every power she had to block any action in the House to limit the authority of the EPA.

She told reporters she thought it was highly unlikely the moves to stifle the EPA would pass in the Senate — much less be signed into law by US President Barack Obama.

However, some environmentalists have expressed concern that Obama could be forced to sacrifice the EPA’s powers at some point if it helps him to pass legislation.

“There is a thunderous chorus from much of industry demanding that these regulations be blocked,” Jonathan Lash, who heads the World Resources Institute think tank, said on Thursday in his annual forecast of the environmental stories that will dominate the news.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top