A Chinese dissident seeking refuge in Taiwan accused President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of failing to speak up for human rights in China and said he feared he could face a lengthy prison sentence, or worse, if deported back home.
Cai Lujun (蔡陸軍), a 53 year-old former businessman who escaped China disguised as a fisherman almost three years ago, spent more than three years behind bars in a Chinese prison after he posted a series of online articles criticizing Beijing’s leadership and blasting the Chinese Communist Party for what he called “holding fake elections.”
“After being released, I was constantly harassed and placed under surveillance by the authorities. I was hassled wherever I moved, but I could not leave the country,” he said.
In 2007, as a result of what he calls a spur of the moment decision, Cai left Hubei Province and decided that he would try and move to Taiwan, a country he felt respected human rights and the rule of law.
He arrived in Yilan County in July that year on a Chinese fishing boat, using a borrowed fisherman’s license with his own photo.
A week later, he applied for political asylum after Taiwanese human rights activists agreed to review his case. He said he was then moved to a holding center and issued papers allowing him entry into Taiwan.
“The government had two choices; they could either accept my request for political asylum and allow me to stay in Taiwan or send me back to China,” Cai said.
They did neither.
An official familiar with the case who wished to remain anonymous told the Taipei Times that Cai’s case was in administrative limbo.
Cai has been unable to work, file taxes or do anything that requires Republic of China (ROC) citizenship because the government has refused to issue him any sort of identification. He receives a monthly stipend of NT$20,000 from the immigration authorities for basic expenses.
However, the National Immigration Agency (NIA) has also ruled out sending him back to China.
“We want to help him … but there is no proper procedure for dealing with a case like his,” an NIA official said.
The agency said Cai’s case for political asylum was rejected after a tribunal found that his arrival did not meet Article 17 of the Act Governing Relations Between The People Of The Taiwan Area And The Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例). That article deals with Chinese that come to Taiwan without authorization.
While the government is unwilling to deport Cai, it is also unable to provide him with the papers he needs to work, the official said, adding that the agency was now waiting for lawmakers to revise the law to standardize procedures.
Another NIA official who also spoke on condition of anonymity said a major factor in the ruling was Cai’s use of a fake fisherman’s license, a charge that makes Cai shake his head in disbelief.
“If I had the proper documents to come into Taiwan, I wouldn’t be applying for political asylum,” he said.
Cai adds that his experience in dealing with the immigration agency has dampened his initial enthusiasm for Taiwan.
“I know how they think: They all discriminate against people from China. I think they are all real bastards and I want nothing to do with them anymore,” he said.
NIA officials deny the charges.
The agency released a statement yesterday saying that it was working with the Mainland Affairs Council to get legislators to revise Article 17 to loosen the entry requirements for unauthorized Chinese citizens such as Cai.
Cai would be allowed to stay in Taiwan but would continue to see restrictions placed on his rights, the statement said.
Cai said that based on his reading of the relevant laws, he is an ROC citizen, albeit from the mainland area and that he believes in the protections of the ROC Constitution.
His case has been looked into with interest by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators.
Speaking at the legislature yesterday, DPP Legislator Tien Chiu-chin (田秋堇) said Cai’s case was an important indicator of Taiwan’s human rights situation.
Last week, aided by a number of other political refugees from China, Cai launched an appeal, challenging the decision to deny him political asylum. The case is expected to be heard by the Taipei High Administration Court in the coming months.
While Cai said he believed he had a strong case, there are concerns that any decision could ultimately be affected by political factors beyond his control.
“I can understand that … the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] doesn’t want to provoke [China],” Cai said. “But Taiwan cannot keep looking to see China’s attitude before it makes its decisions and throw human rights and democracy out of the window.”
Cai criticized President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) for not being firmer in support of human rights and democracy in China. He said it was regrettable that the government had toned down its criticism of the Tiananmen Square Massacre during the recent anniversary.
Nevertheless, he refuses to make any plans to return to China, saying that despite its rapid economic transformation, the situation in terms of freedom of speech and democracy had yet to improve.
“Every day, dissidents are rounded up and detained. Although there are more high-rise buildings, I don’t think that we can call this progress,” Cai said.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday said it is closely monitoring developments in Venezuela, and would continue to cooperate with democratic allies and work together for regional and global security, stability, and prosperity. The remarks came after the US on Saturday launched a series of airstrikes in Venezuela and kidnapped Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, who was later flown to New York along with his wife. The pair face US charges related to drug trafficking and alleged cooperation with gangs designated as terrorist organizations. Maduro has denied the allegations. The ministry said that it is closely monitoring the political and economic situation
Conflict with Taiwan could leave China with “massive economic disruption, catastrophic military losses, significant social unrest, and devastating sanctions,” a US think tank said in a report released on Monday. The German Marshall Fund released a report titled If China Attacks Taiwan: The Consequences for China of “Minor Conflict” and “Major War” Scenarios. The report details the “massive” economic, military, social and international costs to China in the event of a minor conflict or major war with Taiwan, estimating that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could sustain losses of more than half of its active-duty ground forces, including 100,000 troops. Understanding Chinese
UNRELENTING: China attempted cyberattacks on Taiwan’s critical infrastructure 2.63 million times per day last year, up from 1.23 million in 2023, the NSB said China’s cyberarmy has long engaged in cyberattacks against Taiwan’s critical infrastructure, employing diverse and evolving tactics, the National Security Bureau (NSB) said yesterday, adding that cyberattacks on critical energy infrastructure last year increased 10-fold compared with the previous year. The NSB yesterday released a report titled Analysis on China’s Cyber Threats to Taiwan’s Critical Infrastructure in 2025, outlining the number of cyberattacks, major tactics and hacker groups. Taiwan’s national intelligence community identified a large number of cybersecurity incidents last year, the bureau said in a statement. China’s cyberarmy last year launched an average of 2.63 million intrusion attempts per day targeting Taiwan’s critical
‘SLICING METHOD’: In the event of a blockade, the China Coast Guard would intercept Taiwanese ships while its navy would seek to deter foreign intervention China’s military drills around Taiwan this week signaled potential strategies to cut the nation off from energy supplies and foreign military assistance, a US think tank report said. The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) conducted what it called “Justice Mission 2025” exercises from Monday to Tuesday in five maritime zones and airspace around Taiwan, calling them a warning to “Taiwanese independence” forces. In a report released on Wednesday, the Institute for the Study of War said the exercises effectively simulated blocking shipping routes to major port cities, including Kaohsiung, Keelung and Hualien. Taiwan would be highly vulnerable under such a blockade, because it