By now almost everyone in Taiwan must be aware of the story of Chen Shu-chu (陳樹菊).
Chen, a single woman who only completed elementary school, has spent the best part of her life selling vegetables at her local market in Taitung, donating a staggering NT$10 million (US$315,000) to local charities in the process.
She was recently catapulted into the limelight after her selfless endeavors were recognized by Time magazine, who ranked her eighth in the “heroes” category of this year’s “Time 100” list of the most influential people in the world.
It is a heart-warming story and Chen is indeed a remarkable woman. Any publicity she gets is fully deserved, but in fact her story is not that unusual. She is just one of the thousands of kind-hearted people around Taiwan who devote large parts of their life or income to helping others less fortunate than themselves.
What is remarkable about Chen’s tale, however, is the way the president, government officials and local politicians have descended upon her like vultures, hijacking her award win in a bid to raise their own sagging profiles.
When the uncomplicated, unassuming Chen was nominated for the award, she probably had no idea of the ghastly circus she was about to be dragged into.
Initially unwilling to go to the US to collect her prize, Chen was eventually convinced to go after talking with President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and a cabal of politicians, who told her that it would be good for Taiwan.
Since then, we have been treated to round-the-clock updates on Chen, with exhaustive details on every moment of her trip — her journey to Taipei, her flight, her stop at the hairdressers, her interest in US supermarket vegetables, the price of the dress she wore to the award ceremony.
Government Information Officer Minister Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) even went so far as to suggest a movie should be made of her story. Let’s hope he wasn’t serious.
Throughout this period, Chen has been chaperoned by government staffers anxious to remind her to thank the president and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs each time the press pack managed to corner her for a comment.
While it is pleasing to see Chen rewarded for her life of generosity, it is sickening to see the way she has been used. The whole episode has become a garish PR stunt for the president, with Ma and the government shamelessly taking advantage of Chen’s timid personality to plug themselves and Taiwan. It is utterly embarrassing and they should be ashamed of themselves.
If the measure of a government’s desperation is how it exploits even the smallest item of good news for its own end, then this government is indeed in dire straits.
The irony of Chen’s story is that news of her altruistic deeds first came to light in 2005 during former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) second term. Her story was part of a series meant to counter the endless stream of negative stories about Taiwan generated by the pro-unification Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) supporting media.
Now, five years later, it is those same media outlets and KMT officials who took every opportunity to run the nation down that are basking in the glow that this kind woman’s aura has cast upon Taiwan.
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor
RSS