An electronic copy of a report obtained by the Taipei Times on the yet-to-be-approved sale of Nan Shan Life Insurance Co claims that the backers of the Hong Kong-based consortium led by Primus Financial Holding Ltd and China Strategic Holding may include individuals found guilty of financial irregularities as well as close relatives of senior members of the Chinese Communist Party.
The English translation of the report, which is dated March 10 and comes from the office of Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Pan Meng-an (潘孟安), also mentions risks of stock speculation and raises questions about the qualifications of major shareholders and the use of “shell” companies.
Pan's office told the Taipei Times yesterday the report drew from newspapers, magazines and investors in Hong Kong. The office confirmed the report received “government help,” but would not specify which agency or agencies were involved.
The document claims that Primus Pacific Partner (Hong Kong) Co Ltd (Primus Pacific) — which provided funding for Primus Financial — receives “some funding” from the state-owned Beijing Enterprises Holding Ltd, while China Strategic, which according to the report is in very poor financial situation, “is … truly [a] 'shell' company.”
Other partners in the conglomerate appear to have been “tailor- made” for the Nan Shan bid, the report says.
Previous shareholders, board members and top managers at China Strategic “are backed by mainland Chinese money,” the report says, adding that: “Information publicly disclosed by [the] Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission [demonstrates] that the firm has been financially controlled by Chinese capital.”
Topping the list is a well-known Shandong-born Chinese speculator who is reportedly at large over his involvement in two cases of stock speculation and insider trading.
Primus Financial was used to raise capital and hired Huan Guocang (宦國倉) as a representative, the report claims. The Shanghai-born Huan is the CEO of Primus Pacific and chairman of Primus Financial, as well as the director of Beijing Development (Hong Kong) Ltd, which is invested by Beijing Enterprises.
Following revelations of Chinese investment in the Nan Shan bid, Huan cut all ties to the case, the report says.
Primus Pacific president and general manager Li Wenlei (李聞雷) is the son of former Chinese vice premier Li Lanqing (李嵐清), the report says.
The Primus group, the report says, “is backed by ... mainland China's princeling party,” alleging that the son of former vice president Zeng Qinghong (曾慶紅), Zeng Wei (曾偉), and his brother, Zeng Qinghuai (曾慶淮), were both members of the group.
Among the principal parties at China Strategic are Shanghai-born Gao Yang (高央), who was the executive director and chief executive officer of the firm in 2006. While he resigned in 2007, he still owns a 23 percent stake — the largest share — in the company, the report says.
Current shareholders at China Strategic include two Hong Kong stock speculators, who were allegedly handed down administrative penalties by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (FSC) for “rampant speculation,” while another was allegedly indicted by the commission, also for rampant speculation, to which he confessed in 2004.
At press time, requests by the Taipei Times to the Hong Kong FSC for confirmation remained unanswered. As per Taiwanese law, if it were found that bidders have a criminal past, the Nan Shan bid would likely be turned down.
“Funding sources of China Strategic basically comes [sic] from China and Hong Kong, while the shareholders are made up of China and Hong Kong tycoons as well as speculators,” the report said, adding that this proves that China Strategic “is indeed controlled by mainlanders.”
“China Strategic, Primus Financial or its investor, Primus Pacific, all lack ... experience in managing financial holdings, let alone in [the] life insurance industry. In addition, the newly established Primus Nan Shan Holding Company was registered ... less than a year [earlier] for this case. Therefore, observers have called it a 'shell' corporation for falling short on both capital structure and a decent managerial team,” the report says.
The report concludes: “Most people involved in this case are Chin[ese] officials, mainlanders, or [individuals] with a Chinese background. Although it [is] hard to keep track of the final beneficiary due to ... several transfer[s] [in] the investment, concerns about ... mainland Chinese money still exist.”
American International Group sold Nan Shan to Primus Financial on Oct. 12 for US$2.15 billion, which filed an application with the Ministry of Economic Affairs' Investment Commission in November. On Feb. 12, Primus and China Strategic sent a revised application after the commission requested that it provide more information on its investors and sources of funding.
On March 11, Minister of Economic Affairs Shih Yen-shiang (施顏祥) said there was no evidence that Chinese capital was involved in Primus Financial, adding that none of the 44 investors who provided information in the application were Chinese citizens.
Several of the stakeholders at China Strategic, which has an 80 percent stake in Primus Nan Shan, are Hong Kong-UK dual nationals, but none are Chinese citizens, he said.
Fan Liang-tung (范良棟), head of the Investment Commission, said on Monday he could not comment.
“The case is still in the evaluation and approval stage. I am not in a position to comment,” Fan told the Taipei Times by telephone.
The outcome of the commission's investigation is expected to be announced this week.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY JASON TAN
ATTACK UNLIKELY: China would become ‘pariahs internationally for just the wanton destruction of Taiwan’ and would have little to gain from it, Trump’s security adviser said A top White House official on Friday urged Taiwan to build up its military capabilities to protect against a possible invasion by China, saying that Beijing would have that ability in 10 to 15 years. US President Donald Trump’s National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien told the Aspen Security Forum that a missile attack by China against Taiwan would be much too destructive. An amphibious attack is a possibility, although at the moment it is beyond China’s capability, he said. However, China could combine that threat with “gray zone” operations, embargoes, harassment and other actions to intimidate the nation if Taipei does not build
TAKES THE CAKE: Chinese diplomats tried to take photographs of people attending a National Day event in Suva, before reportedly assaulting a Taiwanese diplomat The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday condemned the Chinese embassy in Fiji over a fracas at its Double Ten National Day event at a Suva hotel, while a lawmaker demanded that the ministry file a lawsuit against Chinese embassy personnel for injuring a Taiwanese diplomat at the event. The Grubsheet news blog on Sunday and New Zealand-based Asia-Pacific Report Web site yesterday reported that two members of the Chinese embassy in Suva tried to force their way into a celebration held by the Taipei Trade Office in Fiji at the Grand Pacific Hotel on Oct. 8 to take photographs of
TAIPEI REACTIONS: Joanne Ou decried China’s ‘gangster diplomacy,’ while MOFA said its Fiji counterpart dealt fairly with the incident and protected the trade office’s rights The world should denounce the actions of Chinese embassy staffers in Fiji against a Taiwanese diplomat during a National Day celebration in Suva, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) said yesterday as it thanked the Fijian government for its help after the Oct. 8 incident. Two Chinese diplomats tried to force their way into a celebration held by the Taipei Trade Office in Fiji at the Grand Pacific Hotel in Suva on Oct. 8, and a Taiwanese diplomat who tried to stop them taking photographs suffered a head injury. MOFA spokeswoman Joanne Ou (歐江安) told a news briefing that the ministry
TIT FOR TAT? Messages sent through channels have urged Washington to drop its prosecutions of Chinese researchers or see Americans put at risk Chinese officials warned their US counterparts as early as the summer that they might detain Americans in China if the US does not stop prosecuting Chinese academics linked to the Chinese military, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported on Saturday, citing people familiar with the matter. China sent repeated warnings through multiple channels, including the US embassy in Beijing, the report said. The message has been blunt: The US should drop prosecutions of the Chinese academics in US courts, or Americans in China might find themselves in violation of Chinese law, the newspaper cited sources as saying. The US has charged several