A civic movement to hold a referendum on US beef imports cleared another hurdle yesterday, passing a review by the Cabinet’s Referendum Screening Committee by a vote of 16-0.
After a meeting that lasted a little over an hour, committee chairman Chao Yung-mau (趙永茂) announced that the petition launched by the Consumers’ Foundation met the criteria in the Referendum Act (公民投票法), and “we have therefore decided to approve [it].”
The proposed referendum would ask voters if they agree that the government should retract its decision to lift the ban on imports of US beef organs and bone-in and ground beef, and that the government should renegotiate the deal with the US.
The Central Election Commission is next expected to have household registration authorities check that the more than 129,000 people who signed the petition were eligible voters and that no signatures were duplicated.
Proposals must pass a two-phase review process. In the first phase, the applicant must collect the signatures of 0.5 percent of the number of people who were eligible to vote in the last presidential election — around 86,000 in this case — and pass an initial review by the referendum committee.
In the second phase, the petition must be endorsed by 5 percent of those eligible to vote in the last presidential poll — around 860,000 people — and pass a second review.
Consumers’ Foundation chairman Hsieh Tien-jen (謝天仁) yesterday welcomed the committee’s decision.
“Although only 860,000 signatures are required to pass the second review, we will aim for at least 1 million signatures just to be safe,” Hsieh said.
Taipei and Washington signed a protocol on Oct. 22 under which Taiwan agreed to lift its ban on US bone-in beef and other products, sparking a public outcry.
Civic groups led by the Consumers’ Foundation say the protocol could endanger the health of local consumers.
Under public pressure, the legislature amended the Act Governing Food Sanitation (食品衛生管理法) on Tuesday to target beef products from countries with documented cases of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE, or mad cow disease) over the past decade.
The amendment effectively bans US ground beef, beef offal and other cow parts, such as the skull, eyes and intestines, but sets no restrictions on bone-in beef.
Following the legislature’s move, Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) said the government would consult Washington on matters related to beef imports as part of the protocol had been overridden.
Hsieh yesterday said using a referendum to pressure the US into reopening negotiations was the best way to proceed.
He said the fact that bone-in beef is less dangerous than ground beef and beef offal in terms of BSE contamination does not mean no risk is involved.
Consumers should be allowed to decide for themselves whether to allow imports, he said.
KMT caucus whip Lu Hsueh-chang (呂學樟) yesterday called on the civic groups to rethink their proposal as the legislature had already dealt with the matter.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) yesterday welcomed the committee’s decision, but said there was a long road ahead before a referendum would be held.
DPP Legislator Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) said the referendum must be held in conjunction with major elections or risk falling short of the voter threshold needed in order for the results to be valid.
Executive Yuan Spokesman Su Jun-pin (蘇俊賓) yesterday said the Cabinet respected the committee’s decision.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY JENNY W. HSU AND CNA
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s
RSS