The US Court of Appeals in Washington on Wednesday ruled in favor of the US government in a lawsuit that argues the US is Taiwan’s principal occupying power based on the San Francisco Peace Treaty (SFPT) and enjoys sovereign authority.
Reaffirming that the court does not deal with political matters, the judges said the question was inconclusive.
“Addressing [the] Appellants’ claims would require identification of Taiwan’s sovereign. The Executive Branch has deliberately remained silent on this issue and we cannot intrude on its decision,” the judges said. “Therefore, as the district court correctly concluded, consideration of Appellants’ claims is barred by the political question doctrine.”
In December 2006, Roger Lin (林志昇) and other Taiwanese expatriates took their case to US courts, arguing that Japan relinquished control over Taiwan and Penghu after World War II but did not return it to China.
The group asked the US court system to determine what rights Taiwanese have based on the treaty and the US Constitution, including whether they should be issued US passports.
Lin said the treaty did not address sovereignty over Taiwan and Penghu, meaning the US was still the principal occupying power.
The lawsuit began at Washington’s district court, where Judge Rosemary Collyer ruled in favor of the US government, arguing that courts do not deal with political matters.
Despite the latest setback, Lin and former Judicial Yuan vice president Cheng Chung-mo (城仲模), who is the representative plaintiff, called the ruling encouraging.
“This is a breakthrough for the court to retain its ruling on Taiwanese people’s status as stateless,” Cheng said.
The judgment said the people of Taiwan “have uncertain status in the world community.”
“America and China’s tumultuous relationship over the past sixty years has trapped the inhabitants of Taiwan in political purgatory,” the judges said. “During this time the people on Taiwan have lived without any uniformly recognized government. In practical terms, this means they have uncertain status in the world community which infects the population’s day-to-day lives.”
But they added: “Determining Appellants’ nationality would require us to trespass into a controversial area of U.S. foreign policy in order to resolve a question the Executive Branch intentionally left unanswered for over sixty years: who exercises sovereignty over Taiwan. This we cannot do.”
The “political question doctrine bars consideration of Appellants’ claims,” the judges said.
“Appellants may even be correct; careful analysis of the SFPT might lead us to conclude the United States has temporary sovereignty. But we will never know, because the political question doctrine forbids us from commencing that analysis. We do not dictate to the Executive what governments serve as the supreme political authorities of foreign lands,” the ruling said.
The judges said that then-US president Jimmy Carter’s switch of diplomatic recognition in 1979 from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China prompted the US’ Taiwan Relation Act, which lays out the US’ “unofficial relationship with ‘the people of Taiwan.’”
Cheng said the group would appeal to the Supreme Court, hoping the court could hold a public hearing on the case.
Cheng expressed optimism that the court would hear the case.
Lin said the status of 32 postwar occupied areas including Guam, Puerto Rico and other places had been resolved by the Supreme Court and he was confident about winning the case.
South Korea has adjusted its electronic arrival card system to no longer list Taiwan as a part of China, a move that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said would help facilitate exchanges between the two sides. South Korea previously listed “Taiwan” as “Taiwan (China)” in the drop-down menus of its online arrival card system, where people had to fill out where they came from and their next destination. The ministry had requested South Korea make a revision and said it would change South Korea’s name on Taiwan’s online immigration system from “Republic of Korea” to “Korea (South),” should the issue not be
The Legislative Yuan’s Finance Committee yesterday approved proposed amendments to the Amusement Tax Act (娛樂稅法) that would abolish taxes on films, cultural activities and competitive sporting events, retaining the fee only for dance halls and golf courses. The proposed changes would set the maximum tax rate for dance halls and golf courses at 50 and 20 percent respectively, with local governments authorized to suspend the levies. Article 2 of the act says that “amusement tax shall be levied on tickets sold or fees charged by amusement places, facilities or activities” in six categories: “Cinema; professional singing, story-telling, dancing, circus, magic show, acrobatics
Tainan, Taipei and New Taipei City recorded the highest fines nationwide for illegal accommodations in the first quarter of this year, with fines issued in the three cities each exceeding NT$7 million (US$220,639), Tourism Administration data showed. Among them, Taipei had the highest number of illegal short-term rental units, with 410. There were 3,280 legally registered hotels nationwide in the first quarter, down by 14 properties, or 0.43 percent, from a year earlier, likely indicating operators exiting the market, the agency said. However, the number of unregistered properties rose to 1,174, including 314 illegal hotels and 860 illegal short-term rental
INFLATION UP? The IMF said CPI would increase to 1.5 percent this year, while the DGBAS projected it would rise to 1.68 percent, with GDP per capita of US$44,181 The IMF projected Taiwan’s real GDP would grow 5.2 percent this year, up from its 2.1 percent outlook in January, despite fears of global economic disruptions sparked by the US-Iran conflict. Taiwan’s consumer price index (CPI) is projected to increase to 1.5 percent, while unemployment would be 3.4 percent, roughly in line with estimates for Asia as a whole, the international body wrote in its Global Economic Outlook Report published in the US on Monday. The figures are comparatively better than the IMF outlook for the rest of the world, which pegged real GDP growth at 3.1 percent, down from 3.3 percent