Former Taipei mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Ma was indicted on Feb. 13 for allegedly embezzling NT$11 million (US$333,000) from his special mayoral allowance during his eight years in office.
Prosecutors said that between December 1998 and July last year, Ma wired half of his monthly special allowance -- NT$170,000 -- directly into a personal account. In this way, they said Ma had accumulated NT$11,176,227 in accounts belonging to himself and his wife.
Taipei District Prosecutors' Office spokesman Lin Jinn-tsun (
During the trial Ma admitted he had taken half of his monthly special allowance for personal use, but said he believed that government officials' special allowances should be treated as income, not as public funds.
"The court decided government officials' special allowances should be treated as a substantial subsidy -- as income -- and so Ma did not embezzle any public funds," Taipei District Court spokesman Liu Shou-sung (
Liu said the court upheld the view that government officials have, since 1973, not been required to account for half of their special allowance.
The court accepted that it was a matter of convention that officials enjoyed considerable flexibility in dealing with their special allowance funds, Liu said.
"The court is of the opinion that Ma had no intention to embezzle any public funds, nor did he attempt to mislead his [Taipei City Government] accountants and auditing staff," Liu said.
Presiding Judge Tsai Shou-hsun (蔡守訓) announced the verdict at 10am: "Ma Ying-jeou is not guilty," leading to cheers from Ma's supporters waiting outside the courtroom.
Prosecutor Hou Kuan-jen (侯寬仁) had said in his indictment that the former mayor had admitted in his first interview that the special allowance fund should be used for public expenses. However, yesterday's ruling made no mention of such a confession.
Liu said the court believed Ma had answered a "leading" question from the prosecutor, and that Hou turned his answer into a confession.
The verdict stated that the transcript of Hou's questioning of Taipei City treasurer Wu Li-ju (吳麗洳) was "not credible." The court ruled there were serious discrepancies between an audio recording of the testimony and the transcript.
Furthermore, the court said Hou had asked hypothetical questions and the testimony did not have the authority of evidence. Although Hou recorded answers of "yes" and "uh" to his questions as affirmative responses, this was not necessarily the case, the court said.
The judges said Hou had taken statements out of context, and that they had never before seen such discrepancies in evidence.
Another defendant, Ma's former secretary Yu Wen (
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators Justin Chou (
Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
"It's good that the court made the ruling on the grounds that the special allowance fund controversy is a result of everyone's mistakes, so that it would be unfair and unreasonable for the burden to be shouldered by a single person," Wang said.
KMT legislative whip Hsu Shao-ping (徐少萍) called on prosecutors to abandon thoughts of an appeal to conserve judicial resources.
KMT Legislator Wu Yu-sheng (
"I believe the ruling will come as a great relief to government officials nationwide," he said.
Given that the court had decided special allowances should be treated as a "substantial subsidy," there was no need for prosecutors to appeal, People First Party Legislator Lee Fu-tien (
Lee said that the ruling should be used as a precedent for other special allowance cases involving officials.
However, he said it should not apply to President Chen Shui-bian's (
"Despite similarities between special allowances and the presidential `state affairs fund,' Chen was also charged with using fake receipts to seek reimbursement from the fund," Lee said.
Meanwhile, the president declined to comment on Ma's acquittal, saying the case was not over yet.
"What matters now is to present the [Democratic Progressive Party, DPP] pairing with the best chance of winning the presidential election," he said. "What we should be worried about is the party's internal problems, not outside factors."
The DPP must unite, Chen said, rather than focus on how to benefit from others' mistakes.
Vice President Annette Lu (
Lu declined to comment on whether the ruling of the district court would affect next March's presidential election, saying that reporters should ask Ma's rival, Frank Hsieh (謝長廷), for his opinion.
Wellington Koo (顧立雄), a member of first lady Wu Shu-jen's (吳淑珍) legal team, said that he would have to read the verdict before commenting on whether it would apply to Wu's case.
Wu and three former Presidential Office aides were indicted on charges of corruption for allegedly embezzling NT$14.8 million from Chen's "state affairs fund."
Upset by the verdict in Ma's case, the DPP yesterday urged prosecutors to appeal and go ahead with a second trial as soon as possible.
"We can't understand how the Taipei District Court could pronounce Ma not guilty even though the proof of his crime was beyond doubt," DPP Chairman Yu Shyi-kun told a press conference.
Yu said Ma had a clear motive and also clearly violated the law by wiring half of his mayoral special allowance into his personal accounts and spending the money on personal expenses.
"Justice was not served. This shows that we still have a long way to go to redress the many injustices of the past," he said.
DPP Secretary-General Lin Chia-lung (
He was referring to the case of independent Legislator Yen Chin-piao (
Elsewhere, DPP caucus whip Wang Sing-nan (
"US president [Richard] Nixon stepped down because he told lies in the Watergate scandal [in 1972] ... We want to tell Mr Ma that he is not qualified to be a presidential candidate because he also told lies [in his special allowance case]," Wang said.
When approached for comment, Taiwan Solidarity Union spokeswoman Chou Mei-li (周美里) said the party respected the court, but added that the verdict would only have a temporary influence on next year's presidential poll because voters would be more concerned about candidates' policies regarding the nation's future.
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s
RSS