Former Taipei mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Ma was indicted on Feb. 13 for allegedly embezzling NT$11 million (US$333,000) from his special mayoral allowance during his eight years in office.
Prosecutors said that between December 1998 and July last year, Ma wired half of his monthly special allowance -- NT$170,000 -- directly into a personal account. In this way, they said Ma had accumulated NT$11,176,227 in accounts belonging to himself and his wife.
Taipei District Prosecutors' Office spokesman Lin Jinn-tsun (
During the trial Ma admitted he had taken half of his monthly special allowance for personal use, but said he believed that government officials' special allowances should be treated as income, not as public funds.
"The court decided government officials' special allowances should be treated as a substantial subsidy -- as income -- and so Ma did not embezzle any public funds," Taipei District Court spokesman Liu Shou-sung (
Liu said the court upheld the view that government officials have, since 1973, not been required to account for half of their special allowance.
The court accepted that it was a matter of convention that officials enjoyed considerable flexibility in dealing with their special allowance funds, Liu said.
"The court is of the opinion that Ma had no intention to embezzle any public funds, nor did he attempt to mislead his [Taipei City Government] accountants and auditing staff," Liu said.
Presiding Judge Tsai Shou-hsun (蔡守訓) announced the verdict at 10am: "Ma Ying-jeou is not guilty," leading to cheers from Ma's supporters waiting outside the courtroom.
Prosecutor Hou Kuan-jen (侯寬仁) had said in his indictment that the former mayor had admitted in his first interview that the special allowance fund should be used for public expenses. However, yesterday's ruling made no mention of such a confession.
Liu said the court believed Ma had answered a "leading" question from the prosecutor, and that Hou turned his answer into a confession.
The verdict stated that the transcript of Hou's questioning of Taipei City treasurer Wu Li-ju (吳麗洳) was "not credible." The court ruled there were serious discrepancies between an audio recording of the testimony and the transcript.
Furthermore, the court said Hou had asked hypothetical questions and the testimony did not have the authority of evidence. Although Hou recorded answers of "yes" and "uh" to his questions as affirmative responses, this was not necessarily the case, the court said.
The judges said Hou had taken statements out of context, and that they had never before seen such discrepancies in evidence.
Another defendant, Ma's former secretary Yu Wen (
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators Justin Chou (
Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
"It's good that the court made the ruling on the grounds that the special allowance fund controversy is a result of everyone's mistakes, so that it would be unfair and unreasonable for the burden to be shouldered by a single person," Wang said.
KMT legislative whip Hsu Shao-ping (徐少萍) called on prosecutors to abandon thoughts of an appeal to conserve judicial resources.
KMT Legislator Wu Yu-sheng (
"I believe the ruling will come as a great relief to government officials nationwide," he said.
Given that the court had decided special allowances should be treated as a "substantial subsidy," there was no need for prosecutors to appeal, People First Party Legislator Lee Fu-tien (
Lee said that the ruling should be used as a precedent for other special allowance cases involving officials.
However, he said it should not apply to President Chen Shui-bian's (
"Despite similarities between special allowances and the presidential `state affairs fund,' Chen was also charged with using fake receipts to seek reimbursement from the fund," Lee said.
Meanwhile, the president declined to comment on Ma's acquittal, saying the case was not over yet.
"What matters now is to present the [Democratic Progressive Party, DPP] pairing with the best chance of winning the presidential election," he said. "What we should be worried about is the party's internal problems, not outside factors."
The DPP must unite, Chen said, rather than focus on how to benefit from others' mistakes.
Vice President Annette Lu (
Lu declined to comment on whether the ruling of the district court would affect next March's presidential election, saying that reporters should ask Ma's rival, Frank Hsieh (謝長廷), for his opinion.
Wellington Koo (顧立雄), a member of first lady Wu Shu-jen's (吳淑珍) legal team, said that he would have to read the verdict before commenting on whether it would apply to Wu's case.
Wu and three former Presidential Office aides were indicted on charges of corruption for allegedly embezzling NT$14.8 million from Chen's "state affairs fund."
Upset by the verdict in Ma's case, the DPP yesterday urged prosecutors to appeal and go ahead with a second trial as soon as possible.
"We can't understand how the Taipei District Court could pronounce Ma not guilty even though the proof of his crime was beyond doubt," DPP Chairman Yu Shyi-kun told a press conference.
Yu said Ma had a clear motive and also clearly violated the law by wiring half of his mayoral special allowance into his personal accounts and spending the money on personal expenses.
"Justice was not served. This shows that we still have a long way to go to redress the many injustices of the past," he said.
DPP Secretary-General Lin Chia-lung (
He was referring to the case of independent Legislator Yen Chin-piao (
Elsewhere, DPP caucus whip Wang Sing-nan (
"US president [Richard] Nixon stepped down because he told lies in the Watergate scandal [in 1972] ... We want to tell Mr Ma that he is not qualified to be a presidential candidate because he also told lies [in his special allowance case]," Wang said.
When approached for comment, Taiwan Solidarity Union spokeswoman Chou Mei-li (周美里) said the party respected the court, but added that the verdict would only have a temporary influence on next year's presidential poll because voters would be more concerned about candidates' policies regarding the nation's future.
DAREDEVIL: Honnold said it had always been a dream of his to climb Taipei 101, while a Netflix producer said the skyscraper was ‘a real icon of this country’ US climber Alex Honnold yesterday took on Taiwan’s tallest building, becoming the first person to scale Taipei 101 without a rope, harness or safety net. Hundreds of spectators gathered at the base of the 101-story skyscraper to watch Honnold, 40, embark on his daredevil feat, which was also broadcast live on Netflix. Dressed in a red T-shirt and yellow custom-made climbing shoes, Honnold swiftly moved up the southeast face of the glass and steel building. At one point, he stepped onto a platform midway up to wave down at fans and onlookers who were taking photos. People watching from inside
A Vietnamese migrant worker yesterday won NT$12 million (US$379,627) on a Lunar New Year scratch card in Kaohsiung as part of Taiwan Lottery Co’s (台灣彩券) “NT$12 Million Grand Fortune” (1200萬大吉利) game. The man was the first top-prize winner of the new game launched on Jan. 6 to mark the Lunar New Year. Three Vietnamese migrant workers visited a Taiwan Lottery shop on Xinyue Street in Kaohsiung’s Gangshan District (崗山), a store representative said. The player bought multiple tickets and, after winning nothing, held the final lottery ticket in one hand and rubbed the store’s statue of the Maitreya Buddha’s belly with the other,
‘NATO-PLUS’: ‘Our strategic partners in the Indo-Pacific are facing increasing aggression by the Chinese Communist Party,’ US Representative Rob Wittman said The US House of Representatives on Monday released its version of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, which includes US$1.15 billion to support security cooperation with Taiwan. The omnibus act, covering US$1.2 trillion of spending, allocates US$1 billion for the Taiwan Security Cooperation Initiative, as well as US$150 million for the replacement of defense articles and reimbursement of defense services provided to Taiwan. The fund allocations were based on the US National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal 2026 that was passed by the US Congress last month and authorized up to US$1 billion to the US Defense Security Cooperation Agency in support of the
‘COMMITTED TO DETERRENCE’: Washington would stand by its allies, but it can only help as much as countries help themselves, Raymond Greene said The US is committed to deterrence in the first island chain, but it should not bear the burden alone, as “freedom is not free,” American Institute in Taiwan Director Raymond Greene said in a speech at the Institute for National Defense and Security Research’s “Strengthening Resilience: Defense as the Engine of Development” seminar in Taipei yesterday. In the speech, titled “Investing Together and a Secure and Prosperous Future,” Greene highlighted the contributions of US President Donald Trump’s administration to Taiwan’s defense efforts, including the establishment of supply chains for drones and autonomous systems, offers of security assistance and the expansion of
RSS