The Cabinet yesterday suspended the National Communications Commission's (NCC) approval of the Broadcasting Corporation of China's (BCC) application to transfer its shares to companies allegedly owned by former UFO Radio chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康).
"The deal was illegal. It is obvious that some NCC members allegedly made the decision in favor of Jaw," Minister without Portfolio Hsu Chih-hsiung (許志雄) said.
"We will also refer five NCC members to the judiciary," he said.
The five NCC members Hsu referred to are Chairman Su Yeong-ching (蘇永欽), spokesman Howard Shyr (石世豪) and members Liu Zong-de (劉宗德), Lin Tung-tai (林東泰) and Hsieh Chin-nan (謝進男).
Hsu made his remarks during a press conference yesterday.
Hsu said that the deal violated the Broadcasting and Television Law (廣播電視法), because although the BCC transferred and sold its shares to four companies, Jaw was the owner of the four companies and the law stipulates that an individual is not allowed to hold a majority of a radio station's shares.
In addition, the four companies spent just NT$100 million (US$3 million) to acquire 90 percent of BCC's shares, but the shares were estimated to be worth at least NT$3.2 billion, Hsu said.
"We believe this is a breach of trust," he said. "Obviously, there is something wrong with this deal, so we have decided to suspend it and refer it to the judiciary," he said.
Cabinet Spokesman Shieh Jhy-wey (
The government also suspended the company's licenses for its "Formosa Network" and "Music Network," two radio frequencies first given to the BCC to broadcast anti-communist propaganda.
The case has aroused controversy since June 26, when the NCC approved the share transfer. The NCC also approved the BCC's application to change the chairman of its board, a change that enabled Jaw to become chairman of the station.
The BCC was sold by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Dec. 24 to China Times Group subsidiary Jungli Investment in a NT$9.3 billion deal that included China Television and Central Motion Picture Corp.
Jaw then bought the BCC shares from Hua Hsia Investment Holding, which has been alleged to manage assets for the KMT.
The NCC issued a ruling before the Lunar New Year holiday this year to ask Jaw to fulfill several requirements before the two applications could be approved, including returning the radio frequencies.
Responding to the Executive Yuan's ruling, Su said that the NCC would petition for a constitutional interpretation on the administrative authority of an independent organization.
Meanwhile, the NCC would ask the Grand Council of Justices to review the constitutionality of the Executive Yuan's operational guidelines for dealing with independent organizations, he said.
Su said that the commission would also officially notify the Executive Yuan that the NCC's ruling on the BCC case remained valid.
Su said that the commission had tried every means possible to investigate the BCC transaction, but emphasized that the commission was not authorized to look into other aspects of the deal.
"The commission only asked whether overseas investors were involved and if political parties, the government or the military had any part in the transaction," he said.
Su also said that the Government Information Office (GIO) was not qualified to criticize the NCC for failing to take back the two radio frequencies.
"Over the past seven years, it [the GIO] has had opportunities to take back those frequencies, but all eight ministers who have presided over this endeavor have done absolutely nothing," he said.
Shyr pointed to what he perceived as ludicrous allegations in the GIO's press releases.
Shyr said that while Shieh claimed he had been looking into the BCC deal for four months, in the past week Shieh's statement had changed from "it is affirmed that NCC members are suspected of misconduct" to "the NCC might be suspected of misconduct."
Shieh also changed his statement when he referred to the evidence of misconduct -- from "solid evidence" to "media reports," Shyr said.
Meanwhile, Jaw went to the Taipei District Prosecutors' Office yesterday to file a lawsuit against Shieh and Hsu.
"I accuse the pair of slander, offenses relating to the protection of secrets and the Law for the Protection of Computer-managed Personal Information (電腦處理個人資料保護法)," Jaw told reporters.
He said the pair alleged he had spent between NT$600 million and NT$700 million to buy the BCC, but he had spent several times that amount.
He said that the pair accused him of using front companies to buy the BCC, but these were real companies.
He said he did not accept the Executive Yuan's suspension order and would file a lawsuit to Taipei High Administrative Court.
In response to the Cabinet's decision, the KMT caucus threatened to sue Premier Chang Chun-hsiung (
KMT Legislator Hsu Shao-ping (
"The KMT believes the Cabinet is not the superior of the NCC," she said.
"The Cabinet ignored the Grand Justices' interpretation. We plan to sue Chang Chun-hsiung and Shieh Jhy-wey in a bid to defend the nation's democratic and constitutional mechanisms," she said.
Additional reporting by Flora Wang and Rich Chang
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s
RSS