The committee convened by the pan-blue-camp-dominated legislature to investigate the shooting of President Chen Shui-bian (
Two articles of the March 19 Shooting Truth Investigation Special Committee Statute (
"The committee formerly enjoyed prosecutorial powers of investigation and the same authority as the Legislative Yuan. This was against the Constitution and has been invalidated," Judicial Yuan Secretary-General Fan Kuang-chun (范光群) quoted the verdict as saying at a press conference yesterday.
The court's constitutional interpretation was the result of an application by 93 Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) lawmakers on Sept. 15.
The lawmakers hoped that the grand justices would rule the statute to be unconstitutional and fully suspend the committee's operations.
But this did not happen.
Referring to the request for suspension, the grand justices ruled, "It is not necessary to discuss whether or not to suspend [the committee] now that the interpretation is available."
In response to the verdict, committee member Yeh Yao-peng (
"The grand justices only care about which government office the committee should belong to," Yeh said. "Their decision will take us further and further away from the truth."
Article Eight and Article Thirteen were the two articles of the statute declared unconstitutional.
Article Eight gave committee members the same powers as prosecutors. The committee was able to summon anyone at any time for questioning and prevent any person from traveling outside the country, including the president and the vice president. Those who refused to comply could have been fined from NT$100,000 to NT$1 million and the fine imposed again if the refusal to cooperate persisted.
Article Thirteen required pros-ecutors to indict any person alleged by the committee to be involved in the case. These cases then had to be heard by the Taiwan High Court rather than lower courts.
But if the high court ruled in favor of the defendant, then the committee was authorized to ask the court to hear the case all over again with the same arguments and evidence and without amending the indictment.
Before yesterday's decision, the committee acted as an independent organization with unlimited administrative and judicial authority.
Such authority is claimed by no other government body.
The grand justices decided to classify the committee as an administrative office under the Legislative Yuan and ordered lawmakers to amend a number of articles to that effect. In the meantime, committee members are now required to be assigned by the legislative speaker. The original statute said the 17 committee members were to be nominated by lawmakers and approved by the president.
Article Four was also ordered to be changed by the grand justices.
That article states that the committee does not fall under government organs and cannot be supervised by them.
The grand justices instead said that the committee must be subject to the authority of the Legislative Yuan.
The grand justices said that Article 9-1 had to be amended as well, because it was inappropriate for committee members to have the power to ask any prosecutor to help with their investigations without the supervision of those prosecutors' superiors.
The grand justices also ruled that committee members must obtain approval from any prosecutor's superior officer before receiving their assistance. In addition, such prosecutors will not be able to utilize their authority as judicial officers while they are helping the committee.
Another offending part of the statute, Article 12-1, states, "The committee is responsible for reporting to and briefing lawmakers and Control Yuan members every three months."
The grand justices said the frequency with which the committee reports to the Control Yuan should be adjusted but did not suggest any particular timeframe.
As for another offending element, Article 15-1, the grand justices said that any changes to the composition of the committee had to be submitted to the legislative speaker for final approval before it takes effect.
In addition, the grand justices said that before the required changes are made to the statute, the committee shall not proceed with its investigations.
Also see story:
The nation’s fastest supercomputer, Nano 4 (晶創26), is scheduled to be launched in the third quarter, and would be used to train large language models in finance and national defense sectors, the National Center for High-Performance Computing (NCHC) said. The supercomputer, which would operate at about 86.05 petaflops, is being tested at a new cloud computing center in the Southern Taiwan Science Park in Tainan. The exterior of the server cabinet features chip circuitry patterns overlaid with a map of Taiwan, highlighting the nation’s central position in the semiconductor industry. The center also houses Taiwania 2, Taiwania 3, Forerunner 1 and
FIRST TRIAL: Ko’s lawyers sought reduced bail and other concessions, as did other defendants, but the bail judge denied their requests, citing the severity of the sentences Former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was yesterday sentenced to 17 years in prison and had his civil rights suspended for six years over corruption, embezzlement and other charges. Taipei prosecutors in December last year asked the Taipei District Court for a combined 28-year, six-month sentence for the four cases against Ko, who founded the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). The cases were linked to the Core Pacific City (京華城購物中心) redevelopment project and the mismanagement of political donations. Other defendants convicted on separate charges included Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei City Councilor Angela Ying (應曉薇), who was handed a 15-year, six-month sentence; Core Pacific
J-6 REMODEL: The converted drones are part of Beijing’s expanding mix of airpower weapons, including bombers with stand-off missiles and UAV swarms, the report said China has stationed obsolete supersonic fighters converted to attack drones at six air bases close to the Taiwan Strait, a report published this month by the Arlington, Virginia-based Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies said. Satellite imagery of the airfields from the institute’s “China Airpower Tracker” shows what appear to be lines of stubby, swept-winged aircraft matching the shape of J-6 fighters that first flew with the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Air Force in the 1960s. Since their conversion to drones, the aircraft have been identified at five bases in China’s Fujian Province and one in Guangdong Province, the report said. J.
China used fake LinkedIn profiles to harvest sensitive data from NATO and EU institutions by soliciting information from staff, a European security source said on Friday. The operation, allegedly orchestrated by the Chinese Ministry of State Security, targeted dozens of employees at the military alliance or EU organizations through fictitious accounts, the source said, confirming reports in French and Belgian media. Posing as recruiters on the online professional networking platform, Chinese spies would initially request paid reports before later soliciting non-public or even classified information. One particularly active fake profile used the name “Kevin Zhang,” claiming to be the head
RSS