The committee convened by the pan-blue-camp-dominated legislature to investigate the shooting of President Chen Shui-bian (
Two articles of the March 19 Shooting Truth Investigation Special Committee Statute (
"The committee formerly enjoyed prosecutorial powers of investigation and the same authority as the Legislative Yuan. This was against the Constitution and has been invalidated," Judicial Yuan Secretary-General Fan Kuang-chun (范光群) quoted the verdict as saying at a press conference yesterday.
The court's constitutional interpretation was the result of an application by 93 Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) lawmakers on Sept. 15.
The lawmakers hoped that the grand justices would rule the statute to be unconstitutional and fully suspend the committee's operations.
But this did not happen.
Referring to the request for suspension, the grand justices ruled, "It is not necessary to discuss whether or not to suspend [the committee] now that the interpretation is available."
In response to the verdict, committee member Yeh Yao-peng (
"The grand justices only care about which government office the committee should belong to," Yeh said. "Their decision will take us further and further away from the truth."
Article Eight and Article Thirteen were the two articles of the statute declared unconstitutional.
Article Eight gave committee members the same powers as prosecutors. The committee was able to summon anyone at any time for questioning and prevent any person from traveling outside the country, including the president and the vice president. Those who refused to comply could have been fined from NT$100,000 to NT$1 million and the fine imposed again if the refusal to cooperate persisted.
Article Thirteen required pros-ecutors to indict any person alleged by the committee to be involved in the case. These cases then had to be heard by the Taiwan High Court rather than lower courts.
But if the high court ruled in favor of the defendant, then the committee was authorized to ask the court to hear the case all over again with the same arguments and evidence and without amending the indictment.
Before yesterday's decision, the committee acted as an independent organization with unlimited administrative and judicial authority.
Such authority is claimed by no other government body.
The grand justices decided to classify the committee as an administrative office under the Legislative Yuan and ordered lawmakers to amend a number of articles to that effect. In the meantime, committee members are now required to be assigned by the legislative speaker. The original statute said the 17 committee members were to be nominated by lawmakers and approved by the president.
Article Four was also ordered to be changed by the grand justices.
That article states that the committee does not fall under government organs and cannot be supervised by them.
The grand justices instead said that the committee must be subject to the authority of the Legislative Yuan.
The grand justices said that Article 9-1 had to be amended as well, because it was inappropriate for committee members to have the power to ask any prosecutor to help with their investigations without the supervision of those prosecutors' superiors.
The grand justices also ruled that committee members must obtain approval from any prosecutor's superior officer before receiving their assistance. In addition, such prosecutors will not be able to utilize their authority as judicial officers while they are helping the committee.
Another offending part of the statute, Article 12-1, states, "The committee is responsible for reporting to and briefing lawmakers and Control Yuan members every three months."
The grand justices said the frequency with which the committee reports to the Control Yuan should be adjusted but did not suggest any particular timeframe.
As for another offending element, Article 15-1, the grand justices said that any changes to the composition of the committee had to be submitted to the legislative speaker for final approval before it takes effect.
In addition, the grand justices said that before the required changes are made to the statute, the committee shall not proceed with its investigations.
Also see story:
One of two tropical depressions that formed off Taiwan yesterday morning could turn into a moderate typhoon by the weekend, the Central Weather Administration (CWA) said yesterday. Tropical Depression No. 21 formed at 8am about 1,850km off the southeast coast, CWA forecaster Lee Meng-hsuan (李孟軒) said. The weather system is expected to move northwest as it builds momentum, possibly intensifying this weekend into a typhoon, which would be called Mitag, Lee said. The radius of the storm is expected to reach almost 200km, she said. It is forecast to approach the southeast of Taiwan on Monday next week and pass through the Bashi Channel
WARNING: People in coastal areas need to beware of heavy swells and strong winds, and those in mountainous areas should brace for heavy rain, the CWA said The Central Weather Administration (CWA) yesterday issued sea and land warnings for Typhoon Ragasa, forecasting that it would continue to intensify and affect the nation the most today and tomorrow. People in Hualien and Taitung counties, and mountainous areas in Yilan and Pingtung counties, should brace for damage caused by extremely heavy rain brought by the typhoon’s outer rim, as it was upgraded to a super typhoon yesterday morning, the CWA said. As of 5:30pm yesterday, the storm’s center was about 630km southeast of Oluanpi (鵝鑾鼻), Taiwan’s southernmost tip, moving northwest at 21kph, and its maximum wind speed had reached
The Central Weather Administration (CWA) yesterday said that it expected to issue a sea warning for Typhoon Ragasa this morning and a land warning at night as it approached Taiwan. Ragasa intensified from a tropical storm into a typhoon at 8am yesterday, the CWA said, adding that at 2pm, it was about 1,110km east-southeast of Oluanpi (鵝鑾鼻), Taiwan’s southernmost tip. The typhoon was moving northwest at 13kph, with sustained winds of up to 119kph and gusts reaching 155kph, the CWA Web site showed. Forecaster Liu Pei-teng (劉沛滕) said that Ragasa was projected to strengthen as it neared the Bashi Channel, with its 200km
MATAIAN RIVER: Rescue operations were ongoing, with officials urging residents to move to higher floors where possible as teams focus first on those at ground level Floodwaters from the overflowing Mataian River (馬太鞍溪) barrier lake swept into Hualien County’s Guangfu Township (光復) yesterday afternoon, leaving hundreds of people trapped and three missing as of press time last night, the Hualien County Fire Bureau said. The waters surged into downtown Guangfu after the riverbank burst at about 2:50pm, carrying mud and debris and submerging streets to rooftop level in some areas. Residents were seen climbing onto vehicles and rooftops to await rescue as thick, silt-laden water inundated the town. The surge destroyed the Mataian Bridge (馬太鞍溪橋) and flooded the Guangfu Railway Station. Rescue operations were launched with support from fire departments
RSS