After a wrenching debate on its cross-strait policy over recent weeks, the George W. Bush administration has decided to retain its existing policy, while leaning hard on President Chen Shui-bian (
Bush is expected to reiterate exiting American policy when he holds intense discussions with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
This will be in the face of what observers say will be a strong effort by Wen to get Washington to definitively oppose Taiwan's independence and make other changes in US-Taiwan policy favorable to Beijing.
The main concern of the Bush administration, sources say, is to prevent any instability in the Strait while Bush is preoccupied with such issues as North Korea, Iraq and terrorism, at a time when US forces are stretched thin by Iraq, and when Bush faces what could be a tough re-election campaign next year, where any foreign policy complication could hurt him politically.
Bush wants Chen "lashed down pretty tight," said one source.
Meanwhile, there was no firm confirmation in Washington of reports that the top National Security Council China aide, James Moriarty, on Monday delivered a personal letter from Bush to Chen that expressed Washington's strong dissatisfaction with Chen's recent statements, culminating with his plans to hold a "defensive referendum" in connection with the March 20 presidential election.
Many observers fear such a referendum could deal with issues related to independence, which could spark a major crisis with Beijing and cause severe discomfort in Washington at a time when Bush is totally consumed with the Korea-Iraq-terrorism triumvirate plus pre-election domestic issues.
While saying he could not speak for the president, a White House spokesman said that "the policy is unchanged," and that Bush will tell Wen that when they meet.
The US leader will also tell Wen that Washington also opposes any Chinese use of force in the Strait or any other similar action that could destabilize the region, the spokesman said.
The spokesman would neither confirm nor deny that Moriarty delivered the reported letter.
In recent weeks, during their advanced planning for Wen's visit, White House, State Department, Pentagon and other officials laid out a series of "options" to current policy, sources say.
These included, significantly, a public pronouncement that Washington "opposes" Taiwan's independence, and a return to the Clinton-era "three noes" policy. That policy would say "no" to Taiwan's independence, a "two China or one-China-one-Taiwan" policy, or Taiwan's membership in international organizations which require statehood.
The administrations' current policy is that it "does not support" independence and sticks to a "one-China" policy. The Bush administration has also supported Taiwan's participation in such global organizations as the World Health Organization.
As the debate over policy was raging, the State Department apparently got the White House to agree to retain the current policy, fearing that any restating of policy would open up a can of worms that would give the administration another foreign policy crisis.
With the White House acceptance of the State Department's position, a series of high-level meetings scheduled for this week to review the options were cancelled. They were postponed until after the Wen visit, apparently to give the administration the time for a more relaxed consideration of Taiwan-China-US relations.
The newly-reaffirmed US policy toward Taiwan, has one nuanced difference from before. Washington now proclaims that while it does not support independence, it also does not want Taiwan to take "moves toward" independence.
This phraseology was adopted in October in the wake of the Bush meeting with President Hu Juntao (
Denying that, an unnamed US official told reporters at the time that Bush had said he doesn't support moves toward independence.
That was a time when Chen was beginning his campaign to hold one or more referendums next year and write a new constitution by 2006, which would become effective in 2008.
The US obsession with tranquility in the Strait was underscored in an interview last week by a "senior White House official," believed to be Moriarty, with the Hong Kong-based Phoenix TV, which is aimed at the Chinese and China-based foreigner elite.
The officials stressed repeatedly the non-support for "any unilateral moves by people from either side of the Strait to change the status quo," and repeatedly warned Taiwan not to take "steps moving toward independence."
While asserting that the US would "have to help" if China used force, the official played down the "semantic" distinction between "do not support" and "oppose," stressing that the main objective is peace and stability in the Strait.
The official made it clear that Washington would not support a change in Taiwan's name, flag or concept of sovereignty.
"That's where we get into areas that discomfort the US administration," he said.
EYE ON 2027: The US military has placed equipment, materiel and personnel on the islands near China, a US officer said while warning about the threat from China The US Army Pacific (USARPAC) is deploying forces and equipment across the region based on the assumption that Beijing could possess the military capability and the intent to invade Taiwan by next year, a top US commander said on Tuesday. Speaking at the TechNet Indo-Pacific conference in Honolulu, US General Ronald Clark said that the threat posed by the so-called “Davidson window” is “still valid,” US military newspaper Stars and Stripes reported on Wednesday. The term stems from a 2021 warning by Admiral Philip Davidson, then-head of the US Indo-Pacific Command, that the threat of Chinese military action against Taiwan could materialize
‘ONE CHINA’ DECISION: A Cabinet spokesperson said that Pakistan had pandered to Beijing, and disregarded international rules and reality with the overflight ban The first Taiwanese commercial aircraft since restrictions were lifted flew over Pakistan yesterday morning following an abrupt U-turn by authorities to approve permits that were briefly revoked due to Islamabad’s “one China” policy. EVA Airways (長榮航空) Flight 65 from Taipei to Vienna entered Pakistani airspace at about 3:30am local time, Flightradar24 tracking data showed. All other Europe-bound EVA Air and China Airlines (華航) flights that departed late on Wednesday night into early yesterday morning opted to use Russian airspace, or go via India. The airlines had been forced to detour, including flying over Russia, since Sunday, after Pakistan shut its airspace to Taiwanese
BUILDING LINKS: Taipei and Europe should cooperate ‘so that no single supplier and no single government can hold our shared future hostage,’ an official said Beijing has no say in Taiwan’s partnerships with European countries, Formosa Club acting chair Rihards Kols, a member of the European Parliament (MEP), told a forum in Taipei yesterday. The Formosa Club, an interparliamentary group of European lawmakers, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs cohosted the Trusted Technology Forum for Democracies, focusing on artificial intelligence (AI) and drone technologies. In his opening speech, Kols said it is crucial that people meet and understand each other’s concerns, and work out how they can help. The club has brought European parliamentarians to the second annual forum to understand Taiwan better and seek
Taiwan yesterday welcomed and expressed appreciation for foreign ministers from the US, Japan and South Korea for emphasizing the importance of maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait at a trilateral meeting on the sidelines of the G20 in Atlanta, Georgia, on Friday. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Japanese Minister of Foreign Affairs Motegi Toshimitsu and South Korean Minister of Foreign Affairs Cho Hyun to review the progress of a trilateral partnership that aims to advance security and prosperity in a free and open Indo-Pacific region, the US Department of State said in a statement. They emphasized