What you don't know can't hurt you. In the administration's latest move to manipulate the economy, top number crunchers surprised the nation yesterday by refusing to make public "abnormal" consumer confidence figures.
State statisticians permanently canceled the release of a quarterly consumer confidence survey yesterday, saying the poor results reflected a lack of rationality on the part of consumers. The agency said the decision was designed to lessen the burden on Taiwan's already-shaky economy.
"We don't want to mislead the public ... as the survey results are not normal. If we publish this weird number, it would have a bad influence on both the markets and the economy," said Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS,
In an official written statement, the DGBAS said the survey -- under the influence of non-economic factors -- had lost its objectivity and accuracy, thereby the decision was made to withhold the information from the public. Government intervention in the economy -- a common practice in the stock, banking and industrial markets -- has taken on new meaning with the DGBAS' failure to make public the survey's findings.
The quarterly index of consumer confidence -- which the government began tabulating in 1998 -- covers six categories including the outlook on household finances, job opportunities, the domestic economy and inflation. The survey also polls public investment sentiment on the bourse and fixed assets.
Reacting to the surprise cancellation, pundits say while political and economic uncertainty has jolted consumer confidence, that's no reason to cancel the free flow of information.
"[While] based on the political situation the cancelation makes sense, consumers have a right to know, and the government has a responsibility to tell the public" [the outcome of the survey ] said Taipei University economics professor Wang To-far (
Asked whether consumers were able to complete the survey rationally -- and whether politics played a role in the decision-making process -- Wang said: "While people may be overreacting [to financial issues] they are not irrational."
Instead of blaming consumers, Wang said the political community bore the responsibility for improving the economic climate. "Until the political situation can be improved, how can consumers be asked to change their behavior?"
And the public is quite clear on the depth of Taiwan's political infighting.
"Consumers are worried about the political uncertainty, [so] the government didn't want to dampen consumer confidence further" by releasing the poll results, Primasia Securities economist Irmak Surenkok said.
But contrary to DGBAS statements that non-economic factors are at play, Surenkok says tightening pocketbooks -- both internationally and domestically -- are also key factors in the consumer confidence slide.
"A lot of people are losing a lot of money in the stock market, and that has triggered the cut in consumer consumption. [Also due to] moderation in global growth, Taiwan consumer confidence will not go up any time soon," Surenkok said.
Hit hard by political uncertainty, the nation's benchmark index has shed 40 percent of its value since the new administration took over in May.
Meanwhile, Wang hinted that while the government move may delay the revelation of more bad economic news, it remains to be seen how long the information can be kept from Taiwan's media.
MORE VISITORS: The Tourism Administration said that it is seeing positive prospects in its efforts to expand the tourism market in North America and Europe Taiwan has been ranked as the cheapest place in the world to travel to this year, based on a list recommended by NerdWallet. The San Francisco-based personal finance company said that Taiwan topped the list of 16 nations it chose for budget travelers because US tourists do not need visas and travelers can easily have a good meal for less than US$10. A bus ride in Taipei costs just under US$0.50, while subway rides start at US$0.60, the firm said, adding that public transportation in Taiwan is easy to navigate. The firm also called Taiwan a “food lover’s paradise,” citing inexpensive breakfast stalls
US PUBLICATION: The results indicated a change in attitude after a 2023 survey showed 55 percent supported full-scale war to achieve unification, the report said More than half of Chinese were against the use of force to unify with Taiwan under any circumstances, a survey conducted by the Atlanta, Georgia-based Carter Center and Emory University found. The survey results, which were released on Wednesday in a report titled “Sovereignty, Security, & US-China Relations: Chinese Public Opinion,” showed that 55.1 percent of respondents agreed or somewhat agreed that “the Taiwan problem should not be resolved using force under any circumstances,” while 24.5 percent “strongly” or “somewhat” disagreed with the statement. The results indicated a change in attitude after a survey published in “Assessing Public Support for (Non)Peaceful Unification
The CIA has a message for Chinese government officials worried about their place in Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) government: Come work with us. The agency released two Mandarin-language videos on social media on Thursday inviting disgruntled officials to contact the CIA. The recruitment videos posted on YouTube and X racked up more than 5 million views combined in their first day. The outreach comes as CIA Director John Ratcliffe has vowed to boost the agency’s use of intelligence from human sources and its focus on China, which has recently targeted US officials with its own espionage operations. The videos are “aimed at
Four former Hong Kong opposition lawmakers jailed in the territory’s largest national security case were released yesterday after more than four years in prison, the first among dozens convicted last year to regain their freedom. Former legislators Claudia Mo (毛孟靜), Jeremy Tam (譚文豪), Kwok Ka-ki (郭家麒) and Gary Fan (范國威) were part of a group of 47 public figures — including some of Hong Kong’s best-known democracy advocates — who were charged with subversion in 2021 for holding an informal primary election. The case fell under a National Security Law imposed on the territory by Beijng, and drew international condemnation and warnings