Wed, Jan 05, 2000 page1

• Farmland legislation passed

  CONTROVERSY Amendments allowing non-farmers to buy agricultural land were pushed through amid protests by both legislators and farmers

  • By Ko Shu-ling / STAFF REPORTER
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Lawmakers yesterday passed a set of controversial amendments to the Agricultural Development Law, despite attempts at a boycott by New Party lawmakers on the floor of the legislature and a protest by farmers outside the building.

  And in what is seen as a blatant attempt to win votes in the upcoming presidential election, Vice President Lien Chan (連戰) yesterday promised to establish a NT$150 billion agricultural development fund as well as another NT$100 billion agricultural relief fund to pave the way for Taiwan's entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO).

  Hsu Wen-fu (許文富), former chief of the now defunct Taiwan Provincial Government's department of agriculture and forestry (農林廳), said the timing of the passage of the amendments was not coincidental.

  

  Legislators celebrate the passage of the Agricultural Development Law at the Legislative Yuan yesterday.

  PHOTO: YEH JEN-HAO, LIBERTY TIMES

  "It isn't really what farmers want. It's what politicians want. The KMT is trying to buy votes from farmers," said Hsu.

  Amendments to the Agricultural Development Law, dubbed "Taiwan's second land reform bill in 50 years," has sparked fierce debate among officials, scholars, and lawmakers, particularly after two different versions of the proposed amendments appeared.

  The first version was the brainchild of former Council of Agriculture chairman Peng Tso-kwei (彭作奎), who last month resigned in protest against a second version prepared by KMT legislators.

  Peng's proposed amendments called for restrictions on building on farmland, saying such construction should be carried out in "communities," while the KMT legislative caucus' version favored allowing the individual construction of buildings.

  The amendments passed yesterday also allow non-farmers to buy farmland, allow construction of farmhouses on newly-purchased farmland and set the minimum size for farmland division at 0.25 hectares.

  The amendments also give power to local governments to decide whether to allow farmers without buildings on their land to apply to build either in collective villages or on individual plots, as well as to determine the qualifications for applicants and approve plans for construction.

  The law stipulates that the government should establish a NT$150 billion agricultural development fund, with the money coming from a tax levied on the value added to land by its rezoning for an alternative use. Should the collected revenue be insufficient, the government has to make up the shortfall.

  National Taiwan University agricultural economics professor Jerry Geaun (官俊榮) said the law will have an adverse effect in the long run.

  "Once non-farmers are allowed to buy farmland, prices are expected to rise. This will drive up the cost of agricultural production and reduce Taiwan's competitiveness and that's not a good sign," he said.

  Geaun also called for more rather than fewer regulations on farmland use.

  "Since the law allows the rezoning of farmland based on use, we need other agricultural-related laws to help manage the farmland; the eight other agricultural-related bills waiting for passage by the legislature are not yet comprehensive enough."

  Geaun said that the law itself is actually a political by-product.

  "It's not what the majority of farmers want; it's actually a compromise produced by minority interest groups," he said.

  Despite Hsu's claims that the amendments were politically motivated, he still approved of their passage.

  "Previously only farmers could buy and sell farmland, but now non-farmers can also step in, and the government will control the release of farmland based on the total amount of land available."

  Hsu sees the new measures as allowing the development of larger scale agricultural businesses, which will result in a lowering of production costs.

  Hsu added that he is not worried about the change of use of farmland.

  "Once the use of the farmland changes from agricultural to industrial, the price of the land will go up, and when that happens, the land owner has to pay taxes on the value added, and that's where the NT$150 billion agricultural development fund will come from," he said.

  Meanwhile, Lien also proposed establishing a national agricultural bank; creating a NT$150 billion agricultural development fund after Taiwan gains entry to the WTO; and setting up another NT$100 billion relief fund to offset possible damage to farmers' livelihoods as a result of increased agricultural imports after WTO accession.

  In his speech, Lien outlined 11 other measures concerning the promotion of agricultural, fisheries and forestry development.

  These included improving technology in the agricultural sector, better coordination of agricultural research, improving the agricultural banking system and greater liberalization of the buying and selling of agricultural land.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Stuttgart and Nottingham Forest advance

  • 2

    Iran’s supreme leader Khamenei killed

  • 3

    Iran prepare for Women’s Asian Cup in Australia as bombs drop on homeland

  • 4

    Marco Bezzecchi wins MotoGP opener

  • 5

    For Bangladesh, just playing is a win