Jan. 13 to Jan. 19
The battle began when People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes blasted Yijiangshan Island (一江山) in the morning of Jan. 18, 1955. They then heavily shelled the uninhabited rock, just 1.24km square in area, for about three hours before commencing the ground invasion.
The defending Republic of China (ROC) troops knew they had no chance of winning, but they had signed a blood pledge to fight the enemy to the bitter end. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) leader Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) had given the following instructions: “Guarding [Yijiangshan] for a day will raise the spirits of people in Taiwan; guarding it for two days will strike terror into the Chinese communists; and guarding it for three days will reverse the attitude of the White House.”
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
The Ministry of National Defense states that the troops held out for over 61 hours, and in the afternoon of Jan. 20, commander Wang Sheng-ming (王生明) radioed the ROC army base in nearby Dachen Island: “The enemy is just 50 meters away. In my hand is a grenade I have saved for myself,” before pulling the pin.
The government in Taiwan declared that all 720 ROC troops on Yijiangshan sacrificed their lives while killing over 3,000 enemies; the Chinese side claims that they killed 519 and captured 567 ROC troops while losing 393 of their own. The fact that the ROC troops didn’t all die was confirmed in 2011 when one of the prisoners, Chen Hsiao-pin (陳小斌), was allowed to visit Taiwan.
Nevertheless, the troops fought a valiant battle, although Chiang has been criticized for sending them into an unwinnable fight for political means and to keep the nation’s war spirit up. The government, however, maintained that the battle did change the White House’s position as the Americans were moved by the troops’ bravery, contributing to the security of Taiwan for the next 60 years.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
TESTING THE TREATY
During the 1950 to 1953 Korean War, relative calm settled over the two sides, as the US Navy’s Taiwan Patrol Force “neutralized” the Taiwan Strait.
This blockade was lifted in February 1953 and hostilities resumed. Chiang pressed the US to sign a formal agreement to defend Taiwan, but to no avail.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
In August 1954, then-Chinese premier Zhou Enlai declared “Taiwan must be liberated,” and the Chinese military started shelling Kinmen, Matsu and Dachen islands off the Chinese coast.
M. Taylor Fravel writes in Strong Borders, Secure Nation that the Chinese intensified its attacks that year to deter the US and Taiwan from signing a defense treaty. Instead, it expedited treaty negotiations.
That December, Taiwan and the US signed the Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty. The US naturally had its own objectives: while protecting Taiwan from attack, the treaty also essentially curbed Taiwanese aggression toward China. As a result, the US avoided direct conflict with China or the Soviet Union.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Beijing was afraid that the offshore islands would be included in the treaty since that would “embolden Chiang to conduct more raids against the mainland and also greatly weaken China’s ability to seize Kinmen and Matsu as steps toward an attack on Taiwan,” Fravel writes.
Fravel adds that in addition to removing the KMT presence from the coast of Zhejiang Province, the Chinese attacked Yijiangshan to “probe the treaty’s scope,” as it only explicitly mentions Taiwan and Penghu. During the invasion, the PLA troops were given instructions to actively avoid any conflict with US forces.
Jonathan M. House writes in A Military History of the Cold War, 1944-1962 that “once the PLA seized Yijiangshan, [then-US president Dwight] Eisenhower felt compelled to respond diplomatically. Just nine days after the battle commenced, Congress almost unanimously passed the Formosa Resolution, which authorized Eisenhower to defend not only Taiwan, but “such related positions and territories that are now in friendly hands … as he judges to be required or appropriate.”
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
CALLING FOR PATRIOTISM
It’s evident Communist aggression toward Yijiangshan did spur the US to immediate action, but did Chiang need to purposely send so many men into a doomed fight just to make a statement?
Wang’s son, Wang Ying-wen (王應文), thinks so, even though he acknowledges that the battle was for political, not military, purposes. His father’s sacrifice was worth it, he writes, as it rallied the patriotic spirit of people in Taiwan. It was also the fierceness and the determination of the troops that alerted the Americans to the urgency of the situation, and Wang believes that their mission was accomplished despite losing the battle.
For the next few decades, the government used the sacrifices in the Battle of Yijiangshan as a rallying cry for patriotism. Two months after the events, Chiang spoke at a Youth Day event commemorating the 72 Martyrs of Huanghuagang who died during the Second Guangzhou Uprising against the Qing Empire.
The number of dead at Yijiangshan was conveniently tallied at 720, exactly 10 times that of the Huanghuagang uprising, and Chiang urged the youth of Taiwan to follow their lead and give their lives for his cause to retake China.
“On this Youth Day, the youth of our nation are especially proud of … the 720 martyrs who died 70 days earlier at Yijiangshan. This is a new historic epic of our revolutionary youth that will pierce the sun and moon and will be sung and mourned … As you can see, thousands and thousands of patriotic youth in [Taiwan] have been inspired by the heroic sacrifices at Yijiangshan, and have joined the ranks of our revolutionary army, determined to fight the communists and save our nation!”
On the one year anniversary of the event, Chiang’s son, Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), also urged people to follow the lead of the dead soldiers: “The Battle of Yijiangshan has rallied the spirits of our nation’s soldiers and civilians. In such a fierce battle on such a tiny island, our troops refused to surrender and all of them perished. This has inspired bravery in our people, and strengthened our resolve to emulate the martyrs of Yijiangshan and continue the fight to destroy the communists.”
Chiang Ching-kuo added that he is “very ashamed today, because I am still alive. I cannot face the martyrs of Yijiangshan. They have submitted their exam to the test of time, and have received full marks. Our exams are still blank. So how can we not be ashamed to still be alive? But we should be optimistic and excited, as the spirit of Yijiangshan tells us that if we continue to sacrifice ourselves, we will be the victors in the end.”
The next “opportunity” would come soon with the Second Taiwan Strait Crisis of 1958.
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
Taiwan’s overtaking of South Korea in GDP per capita is not a temporary anomaly, but the result of deeper structural problems in the South Korean economy says Chang Young-chul, the former CEO of Korea Asset Management Corp. Chang says that while it reflects Taiwan’s own gains, it also highlights weakening growth momentum in South Korea. As design and foundry capabilities become more important in the AI era, Seoul risks losing competitiveness if it relies too heavily on memory chips. IMF forecasts showing Taiwan widening its lead over South Korea have fueled debate in Seoul over memory chip dependence, industrial policy and
And so, in the wake of US President Donald Trump’s trip to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), all the experts on the Strait of Hormuz suddenly became experts on US-China-Taiwan relations. The Internet has certainly expanded human knowledge. Lots of these sudden experts made noise this week about Trump’s words after the meeting with PRC dictator Xi Jin-ping (習近平). Trump is going to sell out Taiwan! Longtime Taiwan commentator J. Michael Cole summed the situation up neatly in the Guardian: “We need to keep in mind that he has a tendency to say many things — sometimes contradicting himself within
There is considerable frustration and confusion among many, both in Taiwan and abroad — including in Washington — as to why the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) seems so dead set on using their legislative leverage to slash defense spending and disrupt the ability of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration to function. Are they pawns of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)? Are they traitors? In reality, there are multiple reasons. In the first column in this series on this subject, “Donovan’s Deep Dives: How and why the TPP and KMT help Beijing” (Sat May 16, page 12), we examined three
It took 12 years and months of standing in the same mountain location for director Liang Chieh-te (梁皆得) to capture a few seconds of footage: Taiwan’s largest resident raptor locking talons with its mate and spinning through the air in a courtship ritual. With only about 1,000 left in the wild and very short flight windows, the mountain hawk-eagle remains among Taiwan’s most elusive birds. The species generally produces only one offspring per year. Using forest cameras, the film crew and research teams document the arduous process the monogamous pairs go through for the chick to hatch and grow up, weathering
RSS