With two young daughters, Mery Montenegro is preparing to add Disney+ to her list of streaming subscriptions, which already includes Netflix, Hulu and Amazon — and, when combined with her cable TV bill, costs her almost US$1,500 per year.
Her eldest Victoria, 6, asks every day when the new platform will launch, with its impressive catalogue of films and series from all of Disney’s studios.
The answer is Nov. 12: Mery, who works at an advertising agency in Washington, knows the date well. It’s the day she’ll start paying US$6.99 more per month.
Photo: Netflix via AP
Disney+, HBO Max (AT&T), Peacock (Comcast), Apple TV+ and the new short video platform Quibi are all players in a streaming war that will only grow worse at a time when more Americans prefer streaming to cable.
“It’s going to have a huge impact on people’s budgets,” said Tom Nunan, an Oscar-winning film producer and professor at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) School of Theater, Film and Television. “I don’t think that there is enough room for subscription relationships with all of these streamers for a typical American.”
In a Deloitte survey published in March, 69 percent of respondents said they had at least one streaming subscription, while 65 percent said they had cable. And while many households have cut the cord to go cable-free with the advent of streaming, 43 percent of those surveyed were paying for both.
Mery, 36, is in the third group, and not by choice.
In her neighborhood of Alexandria, west of the US capital, she says she found no Internet-only option cheaper than her current plan, so she pays US$90 per month for a cable subscription she “hardly” uses, other than for news or the occasional baseball game.
To that, she adds US$5.99 each month for Hulu — the service’s cheapest plan, with commercials — and US$16 for Netflix, which she considers essential.
“I use it on the subway when I go to work, to cook, to watch something at home,” she explained.
Mery also pays US$12.99 per month for e-commerce giant Amazon’s Prime membership, which includes its streaming service. Prime is also useful for renting movies, which Mery prefers over the cinema, curling up with a glass of wine after the girls have gone to bed.
That’s US$124.98 per month, soon plus US$6.99 for Disney+. Total: US$131.97 per month, or US$1,583.64 per year.
THE IRONY OF CABLE
That’s where Mery draws the line, since she doesn’t want to spend her whole paycheck on subscriptions. But the streaming options are limitless.
From YouTube, which has a Premium version for US$11.99 per month, to platforms for Broadway lovers or wrestling fans, to all professional sports leagues, which offer different packages for fans.
The Los Angeles Times previously listed 40 streaming options, which would cost a total of US$353.43 per month, but the Deloitte survey mentioned up to 300 different streaming services.
Almost half of people surveyed (47 percent) said they were “frustrated by the growing number of subscriptions and services,” which make it “harder to find the content they want,” the study said.
“Back at the beginning, it wasn’t a hard decision... to sign up for Netflix or Amazon. It was just two streamers,” said Nunan.
“But am I really going to sign up for six streamers or seven? As the normal consumer, I doubt it,” he said.
Gene Del Vecchio, a marketing professor at the University of Southern California (USC) who specializes in entertainment, estimated that users will end up with the same complaint that currently causes them to drop cable: they spend a lot of money for a lot of programs they don’t watch.
“I think what may happen is that they will look for one a la carte menu,” he said.
“They will start to say, I just want these individual shows, and I don’t want to pay for all of this other programming that I never watch.”
Amazon already allows people to buy episodes or seasons, without subscribing to Prime Video.
Del Vecchio also thinks subscription rates will increase over the next decade to finance original shows, and that streamers will seek to end the current strategy where several friends or family members share one account, in an effort to gain new paying users.
Another strategy, similar to cable plans, will be to offer discounted annual contracts. Disney+ is already doing this, as is Amazon.
“Here’ the ironic thing: five, 10 years from now, it’s going to look like the cable industry all over again,” predicted Del Vecchio.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50