During a traditional puppet contest in Yilan, the host accidentally refers to judge Chen Hsi-huang (陳錫煌) as his father, the legendary puppet master Lee Tien-lu (李天祿). She then corrects herself and reintroduces Chen — but not as himself, but as Lee’s son. This scene underscores Chen’s life, which is the focus of the film Father (紅盒子): even at 80 years old, he still can’t step out of his father’s shadow.
Lee was a larger-than-life personality whose early years were depicted in the 1993 biopic The Puppetmaster (戲夢人生) by Hou Hsiao-hsien (侯孝賢), who served as executive producer for Father. Lee died in 1998, and 20 years later, it’s Chen’s turn to have his story told — although like Chen’s life, the film is still very much about Lee.
The two pretty much led parallel lives — their family background is even spliced and overlapped in one scene.
Photo courtesy of atmovies.com
Lee’s father, surnamed Hsu, had married into his mother’s family, resulting in the first-born son carrying the mother’s surname. Chen tells an identical story, and due to the differences in surnames and traditional belief, the two were never close, with his younger brother (surnamed Lee) taking over the father’s puppet troupe and Chen branching out on his own at the age of 79.
The film’s Chinese title translates as “red box,” which houses Marshal Tian Du (田都元帥), the god of performing arts who Chen prays to before performing. The box and the deity it contains was the only thing Chen took when he left the family troupe, and in a sense it has become a replacement for his father, hence the Chinese and English film titles refer to the same idea despite being literally distinct.
Lee witnessed the decline of the traditional puppet industry in the 1970s until foreign interest sparked a late-career renaissance, which allowed him to travel the globe and even moonlight as a movie star.
Chen’s fate is much bleaker. The entire film carries a melancholy tone of helplessness as the viewer gets the feeling that society has moved on, with most puppet masters and musicians in their twilight years. Although Chen has trained two disciples and doesn’t hesitate to showcase and teach his art, stating many times that he is willing to pass on everything he knows, the troupe struggles to find performance opportunities. Even when it does, attendance is sparse and the troupe is plagued by permit issues and noise complaints.
Director Yang Li-chou (楊力州), who spent 10 years making the film, asks aloud twice: Am I shooting the story of a man’s legacy, or am I documenting the demise of a tradition? Is this just a performance of despair?
The film opens with a stunningly emotional sequence that begins with an old photo of father and son, transitioning to a fixed-camera frame of a pensive Chen talking about his father. He doesn’t have much to say, quickly falling silent and staring straight at the camera. The next scene is a poignant close up of Chen’s wrinkled hand dancing without a puppet against a black background, and finally the camera zooms out to reveal an empty theater.
These closeups of Chen, totally immersed in his art, appear several more times in the film and are always a joy to watch. When the camera zooms out, Chen’s passion towards his craft is apparent as he closes his eyes while moving fluidly and looks at his puppet lovingly before finishing. The soundtrack is masterfully employed to elicit emotion, striking a delicate balance between live sounds, melancholy cello and erhu-based background music and complete silence.
Perhaps the most heartbreaking part of the film is Chen’s persistence in preserving his dying art; despite his rocky relationship with his father and lack of interest in his art, puppetry is all that he has ever known, and ever had.
In addition to including parts of the filming process into the movie (such as when Yang asks Chen for permission to film his hand without the puppet), an interesting device the director employs is having Chen’s disciples watch footage from the film during the interviews before asking them questions. It’s not a straight-up traditional documentary, with other experimental devices used — the best saved for last in a tear-jerking final sequence that shall not be revealed.
Despite Yang’s profile as a prolific and award-winning documentary filmmaker, he says it was hard to get sponsorship for the film. He quips in a Business Weekly (商業週刊) interview that the film contains three elements that are considered “box office poison:” old people, puppetry and documentary filmmaking. Some people urged him to remove some close up shots of the puppetry, but Yang refused.
And the film has enjoyed success so far, winning best feature at the 11th Chinese Documentary Festival in Hong Kong this past weekend as well as leading all Taiwanese films in box office sales since it hit the theaters last Friday.
Yang once said that he experiences a person’s lifetime in each story he shoots, which can be hard on his soul as most people’s lives are not easy. Luckily, his approach results in deeply moving pieces like Father for the audience to enjoy and cry over.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50