As tens of thousands cheered in May last year when the same-sex marriage ban was ruled unconstitutional, Jennifer Lu (呂欣潔) knew that the battle was far from over.
“I didn’t feel happy or excited because we still needed to go back to the legislature and make them pass the bill we want,” says Lu, who is coordinator of the Marriage Equality Coalition (MEC). “The ruling was an amazing moment for the LGBT movement in Taiwan, but as a leader of the campaign, I was quite worried about people losing their motivation to continue.”
Lu’s concerns have proved prescient. The Council of Grand Justices gave the legislature two years to legalize same-sex marriage — either to amend the Civil Code’s gendered language, as LGBTQ activists prefer, or to create a separate same-sex civil partnership law.
Photo courtesy of the Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights
However, in April, the Central Election Commission approved three referendum proposals from anti-LGBTQ organizations that, if passed, could create a separate law for same-sex couples, restrict the definition of marriage in the Civil Code to unions between men and women and eliminate education about homosexuality for younger students.
Creating a law specifically for same-sex couples rather than removing gendered language from the Civil Code would deny gay people the title of “marriage,” implying that it is distinct from heterosexual partnerships. If the separate law is not identical to the Civil Code, activists fear they will need years of additional litigation to achieve the same rights.
As anti-LGBTQ organizations rush to gather the 281,745 signatures needed by the end of this month for the proposals to coincide with the November municipal elections, marriage equality activists face difficulties mobilizing opposition.
Photo courtesy of the Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights
LOW ‘CRISIS AWARENESS’
Paowuchien (拋物線), a pseudonym for founder of LGBTQ organization Rainbow Boulevard, says “people lack crisis awareness.”
Paowuchien cites as an example a gay cafe owner with whom she wanted to collaborate to petition the government to revise the Civil Code.
Photo courtesy of the Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights
“Why do we have to do this? Hasn’t it already passed?” he asked her.
Huang Hsin-yi (黃馨儀), a MEC volunteer, says momentum remains low.
“People are waiting to get married, and people think, ‘Yes, we can get married already,’” Huang says.
LGBTQ activists contrast the lack of awareness with a strong anti-gay movement that lobbies politicians effectively.
“Gay people are not visible. You don’t know where they are,” Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights secretary-general Chien Chih-chieh (簡至潔) says. “Churches are well-organized, gay people are not. Churches give campaign donations, gay people don’t.”
Chien sees this vocal opposition as one source of legislators’ reluctance to openly support amending the Civil Code, with most maintaining neutrality in the lead-up to the referendum — and the municipal elections. It’s also why same-sex marriage activists are annoyed that Premier William Lai (賴清德) continues to drag his feet in drafting a same-sex marriage proposal, even though he promised one by the end of last year.
Indeed, there was a campaign last year to recall New Power Party (NPP) Executive Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) after he voiced support for same-sex marriage. Though it failed, 48,693 constituents voted in favor of recalling Huang, while less than half that number — 21,748 — voted against it. Huang’s detractors needed to cast at least 63,888 “yes” votes.
For marriage equality activists, the potential political ramifications of the referendum proposals are more significant than the success or failure, as legislators use them to gauge public support.
“If they get a lot of votes, then the government will choose not to revise the Civil Code, and maybe they will give us a separate bill,” Chien says.
LEGAL CONFUSIONS
Cora Lee (李欣宜) occasionally accompanies friends to LGBTQ events, but is unsure what the referendum proposals mean. When the anti-LGBTQ proposals were approved, she didn’t think they would affect her because she was not considering marriage.
“Even if society accepts gay people, if my parents won’t accept me, then it doesn’t change my life,” Lee says.
Chang Xin-yu (張欣渝) says the proposals are somewhat confusing.
“The wording of the proposals are deliberately complicated, to make people unable to understand it,” she says, citing confusion over legal technicalities to explain widespread indifference to the referendum proposals. “I have a lot of friends who think if marriage equality happens, it’s fine, regardless of whether it’s a separate law or a modification of the Civil Code.”
When Flora Yang (楊彤玉) describes her indignant reaction to the proposals, she says that the lack of understanding between creating a separate law and revising the Civil Code disadvantages marriage equality activists.
“If supporters of marriage equality don’t disseminate easily understandable information, those who agree with same-sex marriage may end up supporting a separate law,” she says.
NORMALIZING MARRIAGE EQUALITY
The MEC believes that to turn the anti-LGBTQ referendum proposals in favor of the “no” campaign, activists need a new tactic, beyond rallies, protests and anger: conversation.
This strategy puts ordinary citizens on the front lines, relying on people like Chang, who recalls countering misinformation about homosexuality within her LINE group chat in 2016, when the Council of Grand Justices was studying the marriage equality case.
“Some people just need to see that you are normal, and not so different from them,” she says.
Yet, if many members of the gay community do not get the word out, same-sex marriage activists face an uphill climb.
“We need to educate our supporters to calm down, don’t get angry,” Lu says. “Don’t fight the opposition, your parents or your relatives. Try to deliver the right information.”
A post titled “I want to get COVID-19 to pay off my debts” caused a stir on popular Internet forum Dcard last month, as the anonymous user asked for the blood or saliva of the infected so she could claim her pandemic insurance payout of NT$75,000. She had paid just NT$809 for the policy. Although the user later clarified that the post was made in jest to criticize the government’s handling of the ongoing insurance crisis, it’s entirely plausible that some would get infected on purpose to receive their payout — especially given that over 99 percent of the reported Omicron
In one of the most remote parts of Chiayi County, a hamlet shares the exact same name as a well-known center of tea production in New Taipei City. Pinglin (坪林) in Dapu Township (大埔) is around 550m above sea level. The road to it is good enough for any car or motorcycle, and so few people live there that it’s an ideal place for the virus-afraid to go sightseeing. I rode in from Yujing District (玉井) in Tainan, taking Provincial Highway 3 through Nansi (楠西) and above Zengwen Reservoir (曾文水庫). At the entrance to Chiayi Farm (嘉義農場), I halted briefly, curious if
May 23 to May 29 After holding out for seven years, more than 250 Yunlin-based resistance fighters were finally persuaded to surrender in six separate ceremonies on May 25, 1902. The Japanese had subdued most of the Han Taiwanese within six months of their arrival in 1895, but intermittent unrest continued — in Yunlin, the Tieguoshan (鐵國山) guerillas caused the new regime much headache through at least 1901. These surrender ceremonies were common and usually conducted peacefully, but the Japanese had different plans for these troublemakers. Once the event concluded, they gunned down every single attendee with machine guns. Only Chien Shui-shou
You’ll need good eyesight to fully browse the Her stories on the postage stamps (真善美:方寸之間的女性形象特展) exhibition. Although some are shown with zoomed in replicas or feature blown up elements, most of the stamps are presented in their original 3cm-by-4cm size. What makes this fully-bilingual exhibition fascinating, however, are the original artifacts and artwork that many of the stamps are based on, as it’s a collaboration between the Postal Museum, National History Museum and women’s rights groups. For history buffs, it’s a unique way to browse through Chunghwa Post’s ideas of female representation since it took over the nation’s mail service
RSS