How quickly humanity draws down the greenhouse gases driving global warming will determine whether sea levels rise half-a-meter or six times that, even if Paris climate pact goals are fully met, researchers reported last week in a study.
“The trajectory of emissions in the next few decades will shape our coastlines in the centuries to come,” said lead author Matthias Mengel, a scientist at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany.
Every five years that elapse before carbon pollution peaks will add 20 centimeters to sea level rise in 2300, the study found.
Photo: AFP
“This is the same amount we have experienced so far since the beginning of the fossil fuel economy,” Mengel said by e-mail.
The world collectively spews about 40 billion tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere every year. After stalling for three years, emissions rose by two percent in 2017, dashing hopes they had peaked. On current trends, emissions could increase for at least another decade. The 197-nation Paris Agreement calls for capping global warming at “well below” two degrees Celsius, and pursuing efforts to hold the line at 1.5oC.
Average global temperatures have already gone up by 1oC since the industrial revolution began.
The treaty also sets a less talked about but equally crucial goal: ensuring that, by the end of this century, our species stops adding CO2 to the atmosphere, a threshold known as “net zero emissions.”
Mengel and colleagues asked a deceptively simple question: by how much will the world’s oceans rise over the next two centuries if both these targets are achieved? The most likely outcome, they found, was an increase of 70 to 120 centimeters by 2300, depending on when CO2 pollution peaks, how quickly it drops, and the date net zero emissions is achieved. That’s probably enough to doom some low-lying island states and wreak havoc in the populated mega-deltas of Bangladesh, Vietnam, India and Egypt, but would at least leave more time to adapt.
Currently, some 100 million people live within a meter of the high-tide level, leaving them vulnerable not only to sea level rise but evermore powerful storm surges.
The study also showed, however, that fulfilling the Paris mandate does not necessarily avert catastrophic change.
If carbon emissions don’t peak until 2035 and CO2 continues to leech into the atmosphere until 2090, for example, the ocean watermark could go up three meters by 2300, rendering continental coastlines unrecognizable. And if the Paris temperature goal is not met, there is a small chance oceans would rise five meters.
The biggest wild card in predicting future sea levels is the Antarctic ice sheet, which contains enough frozen water to lift oceans several dozen meters. Its western peninsula is especially sensitive to climate change.
“Large ice loss seems possible even under modest warming in line with the Paris agreement,” said Mengel. “A sea level rise of up to three meters by 2300 cannot be ruled out.”
Ocean uplift is also driven by the expansion of water as it warms, and runoff from melting glaciers. Earth’s atmosphere responds far more quickly to cuts in greenhouse gas emissions than oceans. Indeed, scientists estimate that there is at least half-a-meter of “committed” sea level rise already in the pipeline, perhaps more. “Even if we stop emitting today, the effects of our past emissions will be felt for centuries to come,” said Pete Strutton, an oceanographer at the University of Tasmania. “Every year that we delay action has consequences for the future.”
Matthias Mengel acknowledged that the best-case projections in the study are “really optimistic.” Despite voluntary, carbon-cutting pledges by virtually all the world’s nations, global temperatures are on track to rise 3oC above pre-industrial levels by 2100.
“In the end, the Paris Agreement will not be evaluated on what it promised or aspires to do, but on the change it managed to catalyze and the emissions reductions achieved in the real world,” said co-author Joeri Rogelj, a climate modeler at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis in Austria.
Last week, Viola Zhou published a marvelous deep dive into the culture clash between Taiwanese boss mentality and American labor practices at the Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC) plant in Arizona in Rest of World. “The American engineers complained of rigid, counterproductive hierarchies at the company,” while the Taiwanese said American workers aren’t dedicated. The article is a delight, but what it is depicting is the clash between a work culture that offers employee autonomy and at least nods at work-life balance, and one that runs on hierarchical discipline enforced by chickenshit. And it runs on chickenshit because chickenshit is a cultural
My previous column Donovan’s Deep Dives: The powerful political force that vanished from the English press on April 23 began with three paragraphs of what would be to most English-language readers today incomprehensible gibberish, but are very typical descriptions of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) internal politics in the local Chinese-language press. After a quiet period in the early 2010s, the English press stopped writing about the DPP factions, the factions changed and eventually local English-language journalists could not reintroduce the subject without a long explanation on the context that would not fit easily in a typical news article. That previous
April 29 to May 5 One month before the Taipei-Keelung New Road (北基新路) was set to open, the news that US general Douglas MacArthur had died, reached Taiwan. The military leader saw Taiwan as an “unsinkable aircraft carrier” that was of huge strategic value to the US. He’d been a proponent of keeping it out of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) hands. Coupled with the fact that the US had funded more than 50 percent of the road’s construction costs, the authorities at the last minute renamed it the MacArthur Thruway (麥帥公路) for his “great contributions to the free world and deep
Years ago, I was thrilled when I came across a map online showing a fun weekend excursion: a long motorcycle ride into the mountains of Pingtung County (屏東) going almost up to the border with Taitung County (台東), followed by a short hike up to a mountain lake with the mysterious name of “Small Ghost Lake” (小鬼湖). I shared it with a more experienced hiking friend who then proceeded to laugh. Apparently, this road had been taken out by landslides long before and was never going to be fixed. Reaching the lake this way — or any way that would