In June of last year, Heritage Auctions decided to increase the number of its prints and multiples auctions from four times a year to once a month.
It had been holding live and online auctions in the category (which describes any artwork that is produced in editions, rather than one-offs) for about a year, and when “we tried it online at a lower price point, we couldn’t believe it,” says Leon Benrimon, director of modern and contemporary art at Heritage.
“Everything sold.”
Photo: Reuters
The sales have gone so well, he says, that they plan to start holding them weekly this summer. “People are excited,” he says. “But we’re still only capturing a fragment of the marketplace.”
Prints have been around since the Renaissance, and have always occupied a slightly uneasy place in the art market. They’re designed by an artist and often signed by the artist, but they are, by definition, reproductions.
“They used to call it a gateway drug,” says Deborah Ripley, director of Bonhams auction house’s prints and multiples department. “It was where beginners in the art world started collecting, and that would encourage them: They might have been buying works at a lower price point, but they could tell their friends, ‘Yes, I have a work by Warhol.”
Photo: AP
Prints might be an entry point into the art market, specialists say, but it’s increasingly clear that for many, the category has become a destination in itself over the last two years or so.
“Off the top of my head, I’d say that 50 percent of every auction [is made up of] new bidders,” says Benrimon. That’s a lot of new people each time. “And that’s not after one or two auctions — that’s after 15 of them. And we just look at it, and we don’t get it: How is that possible?”
REPUTATION AND QUALITY
As with every market, the prints market has tiers. There are very expensive prints, a few of which have sold for more than US$1 million; there are merely expensive prints, which sell for six-figure sums; and there is the so-called “low market” of prints, effectively in the sub US$15,000 range.
The most expensive prints will have been designed by an artist expressly as a print: It’s a work of art that is intended to be reproduced. At the lowest end of the market, in contrast, prints are copies of paintings.
The value of a print — any print — is largely determined by two things: “The reputation of the artist and the quality of a print,” says Dick Solomon, president of Pace Prints, a New York gallery and publisher that deals with the very highest end of the market. “To a lesser extent, there’s also the number of prints in the edition.”
The edition size, or number of reproductions, is decided beforehand by the artist, and it is finite: If it’s an edition of 72, you can be sure only 72 exist.
(This is fudged slightly by the phenomenon of “artist’s proofs,” the initial impressions used to test the print, which can add to the total number of works in an edition.)
When Solomon entered the business in the 1970s, the primary economic driver for prints was old masters; once that supply dried up, the market pivoted to work from the 20th century and then the 21st century.
“In the old days, there were such things as painting collectors and print collectors,” Solomon says. “Now it’s a mixed bag and really depends on the price level.”
Dealers are currently trying to understand the growth in the prints market, and—just as important—figure out if that growth will continue.
“The print market is very closely tied to the originals market,” says Robert Kennan, the head of editions in Europe for Phillips auction house.
Kennan organized a day and evening sale on Thursday in London that totaled US$6.3 million. “That drives what we do, and on the whole, [the market] is led by that,” he says.
On one level, that’s intuitive: If an artist or a genre is selling for millions, a slightly less special work by that artist that sells for mere thousands will be desirable.
But the growth in the market, dealers say, can also be attributed to a different kind of trickle-down from the so-called originals market, and it’s one that’s far harder to quantify: the perception, lent by big-ticket sales that draw headlines, that art is, on some fundamental level, an asset rather than just decoration.
“Now they all have the same question, which wasn’t necessarily a question that was asked several years ago,” says Solomon. “And that’s: Do you think it’s a good investment?”
RISKY INVESTMENT?
Solomon, who deals only at the very top of the market, says that his answer can go two ways.
“You have to be very honest, and some art is not necessarily a good investment financially but could be aesthetically,” he says. “But sometimes it’s not so aesthetically pleasing, but it’s a hell of a good investment because the artist is hot and there’s international demand.”
The lower end of the market is trickier.
The growth of online sales, and third-party sites that direct traffic to those sales, has contributed to the kind of robust growth in volume that’s allowed Heritage to expand from two sales a year, to 12, and soon to its planned 52.
“There are certainly more avenues for consumers, which does create a larger pool of buyers” says Ripley, of Bonham’s. “But we’re also in a fairly strong period in the art market: It’s really that dictum that a high tide floats all boats.”
Currently, the art market is doing well, “so you’ll have prints on a lower price point that will find buyers,” she says.
If the art market were to fall, though, Ripley says that the low end would be hit hardest: “Those are the ones that won’t find buyers,” she says, “while the ones that are on the high end — that are one of a kind and really special — will always find a buyer if they’re the correct price.”
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50