Jan. 22 to Jan. 28
A nine-year-old Henry Lee (李昌鈺) was excited to be spending the Lunar New Year with his father, who would be arriving in Taiwan from China on a ship. Two days before the festivities, on Jan. 27. 1949, the future famous forensic scientist noticed that the adults were acting strangely. They did not tell him until two days later that his father had perished in the Taiping steamer (太平輪) tragedy.
More than 1,000 people died that night as the Taiping, which was headed from Shanghai to Keelung, collided with the Chienyuan (建元輪), a cargo ship from Taiwan. The Chienyuan immediately sank, while the Taiping went down 45 minutes later. About 50 people survived.
Photo: Yu Chao-fu, Taipei Times
The common version of events state that the crash occurred for several reasons, one being that the Taiping had exceeded its capacity with Chinese refugees escaping the Chinese Civil War, which had turned in favor of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). It’s also said that it did not have its lights turned on because it was sailing during a nighttime curfew due to a delayed start. Some accounts also state that the captain had tried to take a shortcut.
Ting Wen-ching (丁雯靜) writes in the book, Taiping Steamer: Legend in Troubled Times (太平輪: 亂世傳奇真相), that through the making of a documentary on the incident, she began feeling that the official explanation was a bit fishy.
EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS
Photo: CNA
Ting writes that the ship was flawed from the beginning. The Taiping was originally designed to traverse rivers and was only supposed to carry a maximum of 508 people. The boat also had too much cargo and likely more unregistered passengers who snuck on board. Lee’s father was one of them, making it onto the ship because he knew the captain. So was Chang Sheng (張生), one of the few Taiwanese on board who was returning home from a business trip.
The goods included official documents, bonds from the national treasury, rare antiques and the entire printing press of the Southeastern Daily (東南日報).
The passengers on the Taiping started rescuing the Chienyuan crew members until they realized that they too were sinking. Another ship had earlier passed the Taiping and asked them if they needed help. Not realizing the gravity of the situation, the Taiping replied, “All Okay.”
The Taiping crew attempted to steer the ship toward a nearby island — but it capsized 500 meters before landing. Survivor Lee Shu-wen (李述文) says that everyone fell into the water at once as the boat tipped over.
“I saw a sea of heads leaning on planks, tables and luggage,” he says. “Everyone was screaming... It was horrific to see and horrific to hear.”
It was around dawn when an Australian ship, the HMAS Warramunga, picked up 34 survivors from the wreckage. Almost all of them had at least one family member who didn’t make it.
John Simmons of the Warramunga still remembers the frightened expressions of the survivors, who were completely covered in oil that had leaked from the ship. “Besides their eyes and teeth, they were completely black,” he says.
DISPROVING THEORIES
Ting lists the various conspiracy theories that surround the incident: there was gold on board, a fight broke between Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and CCP spies, the ship was bombed and the captain of the ship was a Communist.
Since the wreckage has not yet been recovered, Ting writes that it’s hard to come up with a definite answer to quell the rumors. But she found many conflicting reports while interviewing eyewitnesses.
Ting questions whether the ship was overloaded, but concludes that even if it was, it did not necessarily lead to the crash. She focuses on why the ship’s departure was delayed — and traces it to a last-minute addition of 600 tonnes of steel bars. The ship would have left hours earlier if it did not have to wait for the bars to arrive.
Some reports say that the boat was speeding, but Ting argues that a river boat filled to the brim with people and cargo would not have been able to go too fast. As far as the two ships taking shortcuts, Ting maintains that both followed their regular courses, noting that there was not much reason for them to cut corners.
After extensive interviews with survivors, Ting finds that the ship indeed had its lights off at the time of the crash. But she then wondered why nobody saw the Chienyuan, which had its lights on.
One crew member first testified that nobody was on watch, as the third mate had left the cockpit to use the bathroom before the second mate arrived to take over. As the crash happened at 11:45pm, that was possible as his shift would have ended minutes later. But as a witness in court 90 days later, the crew member completely changed his statement, stating that they noticed the Chienyuan but could not get its attention.
Finally, she noticed that the steel bars were not on the inventory list of the ship, but almost all witnesses saw the bars being loaded. Historian Wang Feng (王丰) tells Ting that in those days many KMT officials were in the smuggling business as their salaries would not be enough to get their families out of the country if things went south.
“The Taiping was likely one of the vessels used by officials for smuggling. If it did not have to wait for those bars, it could have left Shanghai on time, and the ship may not have sunk,” Wang says. “These 600 tonnes of bars are an important clue.”
SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT VERSION
One of the other few recent books about the incident is Taiping Steamer 1949: Journey Toward Taiwan (太平輪一九四九:航向台灣) by Chang Tien-wan (張典婉), published in 2014.
Her version states that the ship was loaded far beyond capacity, and also mentions the 600 tonnes of steel bars that caused a delay. A frequent passenger tells her that he would normally have to climb a ladder to board, but the boat was so weighed down that he was able to walk on.
Chang’s story differs from Ting’s where she states that since the ship was running during curfew, it turned its lights off and took a shortcut to avoid running into the military. Her version also brings blame on the third mate, who she writes forgot to adjust the rudder because the first mate was drunk.
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week
June 23 to June 29 After capturing the walled city of Hsinchu on June 22, 1895, the Japanese hoped to quickly push south and seize control of Taiwan’s entire west coast — but their advance was stalled for more than a month. Not only did local Hakka fighters continue to cause them headaches, resistance forces even attempted to retake the city three times. “We had planned to occupy Anping (Tainan) and Takao (Kaohsiung) as soon as possible, but ever since we took Hsinchu, nearby bandits proclaiming to be ‘righteous people’ (義民) have been destroying train tracks and electrical cables, and gathering in villages
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
Swooping low over the banks of a Nile River tributary, an aid flight run by retired American military officers released a stream of food-stuffed sacks over a town emptied by fighting in South Sudan, a country wracked by conflict. Last week’s air drop was the latest in a controversial development — private contracting firms led by former US intelligence officers and military veterans delivering aid to some of the world’s deadliest conflict zones, in operations organized with governments that are combatants in the conflicts. The moves are roiling the global aid community, which warns of a more militarized, politicized and profit-seeking trend
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
RSS