In Tunisian high schools, the dress code is not uniform. Actually, it is: but only for girls. Boys can wear what they like, and now the girls are up in arms.
One morning, instead of turning up for class wearing the regulation navy blue smock, a defiant group of adolescent girls came to school in white T-shirts instead, demanding an “end to discrimination.”
At the elite Bizerte public school in the north, as is the case in most high schools in the North African country, pupils have to sign a school rule stipulating that wearing a uniform applies to girls only.
Photo: AFP
One day in September, supervisors reminded senior female students who did not abide by this rule that if they did not wear the smock, a loose-fitting, long gilet, they would be sent home.
Ironically, the warning was passed on during a philosophy class — about the human body.
This “injustice” inspired many of the girls to take to social networks and vent their feelings, 18-year-old Siwar Tebourbi says.
She said the girls agreed to take collective action from the following day “to demand that this discrimination must cease.”
So dozens duly turned up for class, wearing white. Several boys did the same, in solidarity with their classmates.
How did the school authorities react? By saying nothing. Thus was born the Manish Labsetha (“I won’t wear it”) campaign, referring to the offending garment.
A TERRIBLE MESSAGE
It was the culmination of a dispute that had been brewing for years.
Outraged that the navy blue was imposed on everyone in primary and secondary school but was compulsory in high school only for girls, pupils regularly appeared without it, risking expulsion or seeing their parents summoned.
Monia Ben Jemia, head of the Association of Democratic Women of Tunisia, an independent feminist group, called the smock rule “a terrible message” because it implies that young girls’ bodies can have a disruptive effect on their peers.
She called it a complete aberration, especially since the country’s new constitution of 2014 says that men and women are equal.
The high school students who launched the campaign, both male and female, are also against what they perceive as a wider “hypocrisy.”
“They drill into us at school that men and women are equal, but in practice this is not the case,” said Adam Garci, 17.
That the navy gilet is actually supposed to erase social inequalities between pupils is a source of some amusement to Tebourbi.
“If it was really meant to conceal any differences between rich and poor, then boys as well as girls would have to wear it,” she smiled.
NOT A TRIVIAL ISSUE
Imposing the blue uniform on girls at a time when their bodies are undergoing change is not a trivial issue, said her friend Farah Ben Jemaa.
“One supervisor told me I couldn’t wear leggings without a smock because I was ‘shapely’, and another told us ‘It bothers the men teachers’,” Ben Jemaa said.
The whole affair would appear to be somewhat embarrassing for the authorities. Speaking on condition of anonymity, one senior education official found it difficult to explain exactly what was happening.
He acknowledged the sensitivity of the subject, even though Tunisia is considered to be a pioneer in North Africa and the Middle East in the field of women’s rights.
If the official line is that equality between men and women is an asset, large sections of Tunisian society remain conservative and “there is resistance,” said Ben Jemia.
In the courtyard of another school in Bizerte, the Habib Thameur Lycee, equality is a topic for passionate debate among students.
Of around 15 boys asked about it, just one spoke up for the traditional view.
“Girls must cover the shape of their bodies,” he said.
“That’s how we have been raised. It’s our mentality, and it should stay that way.”
The others were firm backers of the campaign.
One final year pupil tried to argue with a supervisor seeking to enforce the rules.
“But madame,” he asked. “What if the regulation is wrong?”
She thought for a moment. “For me, it’s not unfair, it’s the rules. That’s the way it is,” she murmured.
REVOLUTION GENERATION
School director Iadh Toulgui admitted that the supervisor’s view was unlikely to sway pupils who had lived through the revolution of 2011, which toppled a 23-year police state and brought about freedom of expression.
“This is a revolutionary generation, open to the world. When you try to impose something on them it doesn’t work,” he said. It is a view shared by Ben Jemia.
“These young people are much more aware of their rights — they have grown up with freedom of expression,” she said. “This is the revolution generation, and it is incredible.”
For Bizerte’s regional education commissioner Nabil Smadhi, discussion is the way ahead.
“It is time to address this issue in a national dialogue” involving the education ministry, parents, trade unions and civil society, he said.
“This agitation is effective, not just in the public high school but in the majority of establishments in Bizerte and in several high schools” across the country, he said.
In the meantime, Siwar Tebourbi, Farah Ben Jemaa and girls like them still come to school without the regulation uniform.
“We’re not doing it just for us,” said Ben Jemaa.
“Next year we’ll be gone. But it’s important for the generations who follow.”
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50