To celebrate “pride month,” downtown Taipei once again transformed into a huge rainbow burst of music, dancing and cheering yesterday, as tens of thousands of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people and their supporters proudly marched at the 14th Taiwan LGBT Pride parade (台灣同志遊行), one of Asia’s largest LGBT events.
With this year’s theme, “Fun together — honor diversity, like you mean it” (一起Fun出來—打破「假友善」,你我撐自在), organizers called on the public to break through “fake friendliness” when it comes to LGBT people.
“From gender stereotypes and HIV stigmas to sexual exploitation, this fake friendly attitude is only a cover that conceals discrimination,” wrote the organizers.
Photo: Paul Cooper, Taipei Times
Statements such as “I respect homosexuals, but they shouldn’t violate traditional family values” may not seem harmful, but do in fact express a discriminatory attitude.
“Such statements make discrimination subtler and more difficult to detect,” the organizers wrote.
LEE’S HATE SPEECH
Photo: Chien Jung-fong, Taipei Times
A typical example of such “fake friendliness” are the words recently uttered by Taiwanese actor Mark Lee (李天柱) at the 51st Golden Bell Awards (金鐘獎) in Taipei early this month.
“I don’t hate gay people. I love them, and I also have compassion for them. But I have to say that [being gay] is wrong,” Lee said.
The Christian actor flaunted his true colors backstage when he launched a homophobic rant after winning a Golden Bell Award for best actor in a miniseries or television film.
“I’ll be open about it. I don’t support homosexuality because it’s going to lead to the destruction of humanity and that of the nation,” Lee said.
Lee has rejected several gay-themed TV productions that have approached him. “I won’t betray my faith just for a little money. This is wrong. Homosexuality is a huge curse to our future generations,” the actor said, adding, as though we didn’t get it the first time: “What a curse.”
Lee says he is compassionate about difference, but his words are nothing but hate speech wrapped up in “fake friendliness.” Naturally, his remarks have caused outrage both at home and abroad — a reverse kind of “pride of Taiwan” (台灣之光).
It is worth noting that Lee made the remarks during an interview with Good TV (好消息電視台), a Christian-focused TV station funded by Gabriel Broadcasting Foundation (加百列福音傳播基金會), which targets a Christian audience.
“Lee’s offensive remarks are just the tip of the iceberg,” said social activist Jennifer Lu (呂欣潔) on Thinking-Taiwan (想想台灣), an online forum. “The massive amounts of money and power behind certain religious figures and TV stations, and their lack of understanding of LGBT people is what we face every day.”
A TEACHER’S DEATH
Following Lee’s outburst, the LGBT community was shocked to learn of the alleged suicide of French teacher Jacques Picoux, a tragedy that once again highlighted the woefully inadequate legal protection of same-sex couples.
Picoux moved to Taiwan in 1979 and taught at National Taiwan University until he retired in 2004. His same-sex partner Tseng Ching-chao (曾敬超), with whom he lived for 35 years, was the global agent for Chinese actress Gong Li (鞏俐).
Following Tseng’s death in October last year due to cancer, Picoux feel into a deep depression. Two weeks ago he allegedly jumped from the 10th floor of his apartment building.
The media reported that the couple had bought the apartment together under Tseng’s name. Against Tseng’s wishes, his brother inherited the property because, according to the Civil Code (民法), Picoux was “unrelated” to Tseng.
“They were ‘legal strangers’ (法律上的陌生人) after living together for 35 years,” wrote Lee Yen-jong (李晏榕), a lawyer and Picoux’s former student, on her Facebook page. “Despite their 35 years together, they were trampled by others just because they were not in a formal marital relationship,” the lawyer added, revealing that Picoux was not allowed to make any medical decisions for Tseng when he fell ill.
The case of Picoux and Tseng, and remarks by Mark Lee, are not the first of their kind, and certainly won’t be the last. The good news is that, on the eve of the gay parade, some legislators have announced a draft amendment to the Civil Code to legalize same-sex marriage. A total of 38 lawmakers from all parties except the People First Party have already signed it to support the draft bill. Could Taiwan be the first in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage? Taipei Watcher will discuss this more next month.
June 23 to June 29 After capturing the walled city of Hsinchu on June 22, 1895, the Japanese hoped to quickly push south and seize control of Taiwan’s entire west coast — but their advance was stalled for more than a month. Not only did local Hakka fighters continue to cause them headaches, resistance forces even attempted to retake the city three times. “We had planned to occupy Anping (Tainan) and Takao (Kaohsiung) as soon as possible, but ever since we took Hsinchu, nearby bandits proclaiming to be ‘righteous people’ (義民) have been destroying train tracks and electrical cables, and gathering in villages
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
Swooping low over the banks of a Nile River tributary, an aid flight run by retired American military officers released a stream of food-stuffed sacks over a town emptied by fighting in South Sudan, a country wracked by conflict. Last week’s air drop was the latest in a controversial development — private contracting firms led by former US intelligence officers and military veterans delivering aid to some of the world’s deadliest conflict zones, in operations organized with governments that are combatants in the conflicts. The moves are roiling the global aid community, which warns of a more militarized, politicized and profit-seeking trend