Sept. 5 to Sept. 11
During an interview with the Los Angeles Times in 1972, Chang Chin-lan (張金蘭) called out then-US president Richard Nixon for not appointing a woman to the Supreme Court.
“I was very happy when I heard President Nixon was thinking of appointing a woman to the Supreme Court,” she said. “Then I read in the paper that he did not appoint a woman and I was disappointed. Maybe next time.”
Photo: Han Cheung, Taipei Times
“Women judges are generally more conscientious and hard-working than [male] judges,” Chang added.
Chang, who had been breaking gender barriers since she became Taiwan’s first female presiding judge of an appellate court at the Taiwan High Court’s Tainan Branch Court in 1948, had already made it to the Supreme Court in 1956. It would take the US nine more years after the interview and a new president before Ronald Reagan appointed Sandra Day O’Connor.
Chang’s career did not stop there. In August 1967, she reached another milestone when then-president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) nominated her as one of the 15 grand justices of the Constitutional Court. Her main task was to interpret the constitution and national laws, but she also had the power to provide rulings over impeachment of the president and vice president as well as dissolve a political party violating the constitution.
Finally, Chang’s career was recognized internationally on Sept. 5, 1973, when the US-based World Peace Through Law Center (today’s World Jurist Association) presented her with the Pax Orbis Ex Jure Award during its biennial conference in the Ivory Coast.
In addition to her judicial duties, Chang was also a tireless educator and served on a team to research and amend the Criminal Code. She died of cancer in 1975.
LITTLE KNOWN MILESTONE
Unfortunately, despite her achievements, very little can be found about Chang’s life and career. Only three official sources are available — the Los Angeles Times article, a short Wiki entry and an entry in the book, Women Who Challenge the Times (向時代挑戰的女性) by Lu Shen-fang (盧申芳).
A native of China’s Shandong Province, Chang received her law degree in 1940 from Northwest University in Xian in Shaanxi Province. She was not only the only female in her graduating class, but also finished with top honors.
Chang was working as a judge in Nanjing when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lost the Chinese Civil War, and she retreated to Taiwan with them, continuing her judicial career upon arrival.
Lu writes that Chang “would release the innocent and reduce the sentence for those with extenuating circumstances — but for the unrepentant with solid evidence of their crimes, she would have them executed without hesitation.”
Lu provides the example of a kidnapping case when Chang was still in China that involved a notorious criminal so powerful that no judge dared touch the case. Chang took it on, and despite repeated threats from the criminal’s associates, she personally presided over the execution.
“They had no idea that even though she was a young woman, she was a true tiger who was not afraid of jackals,” Lu writes.
During her time in Tainan, Lu writes that Chang employed women and provided them with opportunities for advancement. She also presided over several high-profile cases, including a mass bribery scandal at the Kaohsiung pier that bolstered her reputation.
Lu also details Chang’s family life, stating that she believed that women had the ability to not only be “successful both at home and at work but also govern a nation.”
Despite her confidence, there presumably were still challenges as one of the few women working in the government at Chang’s level. Former Examination Yuan member Chia Fu-ming (賈馥茗) tells Academica Sinica in an oral history interview, “There were only three female appointed officials in those days — us two Examination Yuan members and grand justice Chang Chin-lan. Even though we held high positions and had great reputations, we still encountered many frustrations that would not be understood by outsiders.”
However, Chang told the Los Angeles Times that she encountered no discrimination.
“I’ve had complete respect from men, even when I started at the age of 23,” she said. “If I had any problems, I wouldn’t have kept at it for 30 years.”
“It’s easier for women to become judges since others have done it,” she continued. “There is no longer the excuse that women can’t do it.”
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
June 23 to June 29 After capturing the walled city of Hsinchu on June 22, 1895, the Japanese hoped to quickly push south and seize control of Taiwan’s entire west coast — but their advance was stalled for more than a month. Not only did local Hakka fighters continue to cause them headaches, resistance forces even attempted to retake the city three times. “We had planned to occupy Anping (Tainan) and Takao (Kaohsiung) as soon as possible, but ever since we took Hsinchu, nearby bandits proclaiming to be ‘righteous people’ (義民) have been destroying train tracks and electrical cables, and gathering in villages
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
Swooping low over the banks of a Nile River tributary, an aid flight run by retired American military officers released a stream of food-stuffed sacks over a town emptied by fighting in South Sudan, a country wracked by conflict. Last week’s air drop was the latest in a controversial development — private contracting firms led by former US intelligence officers and military veterans delivering aid to some of the world’s deadliest conflict zones, in operations organized with governments that are combatants in the conflicts. The moves are roiling the global aid community, which warns of a more militarized, politicized and profit-seeking trend