Sept. 5 to Sept. 11
During an interview with the Los Angeles Times in 1972, Chang Chin-lan (張金蘭) called out then-US president Richard Nixon for not appointing a woman to the Supreme Court.
“I was very happy when I heard President Nixon was thinking of appointing a woman to the Supreme Court,” she said. “Then I read in the paper that he did not appoint a woman and I was disappointed. Maybe next time.”
Photo: Han Cheung, Taipei Times
“Women judges are generally more conscientious and hard-working than [male] judges,” Chang added.
Chang, who had been breaking gender barriers since she became Taiwan’s first female presiding judge of an appellate court at the Taiwan High Court’s Tainan Branch Court in 1948, had already made it to the Supreme Court in 1956. It would take the US nine more years after the interview and a new president before Ronald Reagan appointed Sandra Day O’Connor.
Chang’s career did not stop there. In August 1967, she reached another milestone when then-president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) nominated her as one of the 15 grand justices of the Constitutional Court. Her main task was to interpret the constitution and national laws, but she also had the power to provide rulings over impeachment of the president and vice president as well as dissolve a political party violating the constitution.
Finally, Chang’s career was recognized internationally on Sept. 5, 1973, when the US-based World Peace Through Law Center (today’s World Jurist Association) presented her with the Pax Orbis Ex Jure Award during its biennial conference in the Ivory Coast.
In addition to her judicial duties, Chang was also a tireless educator and served on a team to research and amend the Criminal Code. She died of cancer in 1975.
LITTLE KNOWN MILESTONE
Unfortunately, despite her achievements, very little can be found about Chang’s life and career. Only three official sources are available — the Los Angeles Times article, a short Wiki entry and an entry in the book, Women Who Challenge the Times (向時代挑戰的女性) by Lu Shen-fang (盧申芳).
A native of China’s Shandong Province, Chang received her law degree in 1940 from Northwest University in Xian in Shaanxi Province. She was not only the only female in her graduating class, but also finished with top honors.
Chang was working as a judge in Nanjing when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lost the Chinese Civil War, and she retreated to Taiwan with them, continuing her judicial career upon arrival.
Lu writes that Chang “would release the innocent and reduce the sentence for those with extenuating circumstances — but for the unrepentant with solid evidence of their crimes, she would have them executed without hesitation.”
Lu provides the example of a kidnapping case when Chang was still in China that involved a notorious criminal so powerful that no judge dared touch the case. Chang took it on, and despite repeated threats from the criminal’s associates, she personally presided over the execution.
“They had no idea that even though she was a young woman, she was a true tiger who was not afraid of jackals,” Lu writes.
During her time in Tainan, Lu writes that Chang employed women and provided them with opportunities for advancement. She also presided over several high-profile cases, including a mass bribery scandal at the Kaohsiung pier that bolstered her reputation.
Lu also details Chang’s family life, stating that she believed that women had the ability to not only be “successful both at home and at work but also govern a nation.”
Despite her confidence, there presumably were still challenges as one of the few women working in the government at Chang’s level. Former Examination Yuan member Chia Fu-ming (賈馥茗) tells Academica Sinica in an oral history interview, “There were only three female appointed officials in those days — us two Examination Yuan members and grand justice Chang Chin-lan. Even though we held high positions and had great reputations, we still encountered many frustrations that would not be understood by outsiders.”
However, Chang told the Los Angeles Times that she encountered no discrimination.
“I’ve had complete respect from men, even when I started at the age of 23,” she said. “If I had any problems, I wouldn’t have kept at it for 30 years.”
“It’s easier for women to become judges since others have done it,” she continued. “There is no longer the excuse that women can’t do it.”
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
April 21 to April 27 Hsieh Er’s (謝娥) political fortunes were rising fast after she got out of jail and joined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in December 1945. Not only did she hold key positions in various committees, she was elected the only woman on the Taipei City Council and headed to Nanjing in 1946 as the sole Taiwanese female representative to the National Constituent Assembly. With the support of first lady Soong May-ling (宋美齡), she started the Taipei Women’s Association and Taiwan Provincial Women’s Association, where she
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,
RSS