For the vast majority of people in Europe, knowledge of the Taiwanese film scene extends no further than the work of director Ang Lee (李安) but a greater appreciation is being sparked by events such as the annual Taiwan Film Week at the Center of Taiwan Studies, part of the University of London’s School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS).
Director of the Center of Taiwan Studies, Dafydd Fell, has found the medium of film a useful tool to address themes such as politics, modern history, society and economics.
“I teach in a political science department but being in the Taiwan studies community, I get exposed to a range of disciplines, including film. So I often use Taiwanese films in my teaching of Taiwanese politics.”
Photo: Jewel Lo
Fell, who presented the paper Portrayals of Democratic Politics in Taiwanese Film at last month’s European Association of Taiwan Studies Conference in Prague, responded to student interest in Taiwan’s social movements by screening the documentaries Civil Disobedience (公民不服從) and Sunflower Occupation at this year’s Taiwan Film Week in February. After the screenings, which respectively focus on the unrest generated by the visit to Taiwan of Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) in 2008 and the events surrounding the occupation of the Legislative Yuan in 2014, the audience had the chance to take part in a question and answer session with director Chen Yu-ching (陳育青).
“The audiences tend to be quite diverse for the film screening events,” Fell says. “One group will be SOAS students taking our Taiwan courses but others will be non-students who are interested in Asian film, postgraduate students who have a film or Taiwan interest, [students at] other universities, members of the overseas Taiwanese community.”
“When we show social movement-related films then it is quite common for students who were activists in the past, but happen to be studying or working in the UK, to join screenings and they can bring something different to the discussion,” Fell says. “Social movement topics also tend to attract audience members from Hong Kong but also from China.”
Photo: Tony Phillips
Sunflower Occupation is an omnibus featuring different films outlining the progress and aftermath of the Sunflower movement, arguably the most important protest movement in a generation. Some of these look at the movement in its historical and social context, for example, by featuring former leaders of the Wild Lily Movement of 1990 talking about more recent events.
“It is definitely easier to record footage of social movements today,” Fell says. “In fact, in Sunflower Occupation some parts were filmed using phone cameras, such as the Executive Yuan occupation. However, recently a number of documentaries are being released about earlier social movements from the 1980s and 90s. I sense there is a lot of interest in the continuity between these earlier and more recent protest movements.”
“Recently there had been a stereotype that young people in Taiwan were just not interested in politics, thus the ‘Strawberry Generation’ label,” Fell says. “Election rallies tended to be dominated by older audiences. Recent protest movements and election campaigns have undermined that stereotype.”
Photo: Tony Phillips
Also featured in this year’s Taiwan Film Week was the The Losers (廢物), a film about three interconnected characters in Meinong (美濃), a Hakka district in Kaohsiung City, where land is being bought up by developers and estate agents.
The film highlights social issues such as land development, migrant spouse families, challenges to agriculture and drug problems, as well as Hakka culture.
Director Lou Yi-an (樓一安) also traveled to London for the screening and Q&A session.
“The audience response and feedback has been very good over the last few years,” Fell says. “The visiting film directors also enjoy coming to SOAS as the post-screening Q&A and discussion tend to be very informed and lively.”
Londoners will not have to wait until the next Taiwan Film Week for their Taiwanese film fix as the documentaries Gongliao How are you? (貢寮，你好？) and Small Oyster Rock in Kezailiao are scheduled for screenings at SOAS this summer.
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
April 21 to April 27 Hsieh Er’s (謝娥) political fortunes were rising fast after she got out of jail and joined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in December 1945. Not only did she hold key positions in various committees, she was elected the only woman on the Taipei City Council and headed to Nanjing in 1946 as the sole Taiwanese female representative to the National Constituent Assembly. With the support of first lady Soong May-ling (宋美齡), she started the Taipei Women’s Association and Taiwan Provincial Women’s Association, where she
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,
RSS