In the summer of 2013, Tama Talum ventured into the mountains to hunt game for his mother. The ancestral spirits seemed to smile on the Bunun hunter, for he shot two deer: a Formosan serow and a Formosan Reeve’s muntjac. The animal meat, he thought, would satisfy his mother’s craving — and provide food for other families in his community.
But on his way home, Tama Talum was arrested and charged with violating the Controlling Guns, Knives and Ammunition Act (槍砲彈藥刀械管制條例) and the Wildlife Conservation Act (野生動物保育法), for which he was sentenced to three years and six months in prison. In October last year, the Supreme Court ruled against Tama Talum’s appeal to overturn his convictions for weapons possession and poaching protected species.
“I did it, but I am not guilty of any crime,” says the 56-year-old hunter from the Bunun hamlet of Takimi, administratively known as Lungchuan Village (龍泉), in Taitung County’s Haiduan Township (海端).
Photo: Chien Jung-fong, Taipei Times
Tama Talum’s jail sentence reflects how the traditions and interests of Aborigines frequently collide with the authorities in Taiwan’s predominantly Han Chinese society. Those supporting Aboriginal rights have long raised concerns over the disregard toward the traditional and customary practices of the indigenous peoples, which often criminalizes the Aboriginal way of life.
CRIMINALIZING HUNTERS
Like his ancestors before him, Tama Talum hunts because it is a way of life. For highland Aborigines, a man’s life traditionally revolves around hunting. In Tsao culture, for example, a one-year-old boy is given a hunting knife to symbolize his future as a hunter. When he reaches adulthood, he is given a hat made from animal hide that elders expect him to adorn with the animals that he has killed.
“A hunter’s duty is to look after his family, village, traditional territory and the land… The hunting tradition is an important base for our culture and personal identity,” Tsao educator Tibusungu Poiconu says.
A hunter is, therefore, a highly esteemed, honorable member of his community, responsible for passing down the knowledge about the land and the life of his people. However, in Taiwan’s legal system, the indigenous hero often becomes a lawbreaker.
“In his village, Talum is a respected elder and leader. He teaches youngsters everything they need to know about the mountains, and passes down the hunting tradition. But now, their teacher is suddenly made a criminal. It is an insult to our culture,” says Login Yuduw, a Sediq hunter.
TRADITION AND LAW
Aboriginal rights to land and natural resources are protected by the Indigenous Peoples Basic Act (原住民族基本法), which came into effect in 2005. However, there are many other laws, regulations and administrative measures that contravene the act and have yet to be amended or repealed.
Take hunting rifles for example. Before last year, Aboriginal hunters were only allowed to use home-made, muzzle-loading rifles, according to the regulations on gun control issued by National Police Agency (NPA). Users of these antiquated rifles manually insert gunpowder into the barrel before each shot. If a hunter misses his prey, he needs to reload the gun, which places his life in danger when hunting animals like wild boar. The gun is also prone to accidental discharge, sometimes causing serious injury to the hunter.
Last year, the NPA approved the use of the safer Hilti Corp nail guns, a type of modified shotgun using Hilti nails for ammunition and commonly used by Aborigines.
Legal activists, however, say the limitation on firearms is groundless because there is currently no provision in the law that restricts the types of home-made firearms that Aborigines may own or use, and the possession of unregistered guns are only liable for a fine of up to NT$20,000, not imprisonment.
Today, judges tend to rule in favor of Aboriginal hunters, says attorney Chen Tsai-yi (陳采邑), who has worked at the Legal Aid Foundation’s (法律扶助基金會) Taitung branch for the past five years.
“But the police on the front line keep making arrests.... If a hunter is unfortunate and meets a conservative prosecutor or judge, then he will be the next Tama Talum,” says Chen, who represents the Bunun hunter.
According to Legal Aid Foundation data from 2013, it provided legal assistance to Aboriginal defendants on 73 criminal cases of violating the Controlling Guns, Knives and Ammunition Act, 42 violations of the Wildlife Protection Act and 125 violations of the Forestry Act (森林法).
Among the more notorious cases, four Truku Aborigines of Knkreyan village, also known as Tongmen Village (銅門), in Hualien County, were arrested last year when returning from a hunt as part of the celebrations of mgay bari, the Truku Thanksgiving Day festival. Their hunting activity had been legally pre-registered with authorities.
“The young men [in Tongmen] were handcuffed, and are now afraid to go hunting,” says Chen, who also represented the hunters in Tongmen.
Legal activists say the Supreme Court ruling against Tama Talum’s appeal is particularly troubling because it may affect decisions by lower courts.
Last month, a number of individuals and groups supporting Aboriginal rights staged a series of protests for the Bunun hunter. Shortly after, Prosecutor-General Yen Ta-ho (顏大和) filed an extraordinary appeal against the hunter’s jail sentence, stating that the ruling is based on a narrow interpretation of the laws, which limits Aborigines to the use of primitive firearms and prohibits them from hunting protected animals for personal consumption.
Back in the village, Tama Talum resumes life as normal, spends most of his time looking after his 94-year-old mother and two-year-old grandson. Life goes on as usual, as least for now.
“I will continue to hunt. It is our culture,” he says.
When Taiwan was battered by storms this summer, the only crumb of comfort I could take was knowing that some advice I’d drafted several weeks earlier had been correct. Regarding the Southern Cross-Island Highway (南橫公路), a spectacular high-elevation route connecting Taiwan’s southwest with the country’s southeast, I’d written: “The precarious existence of this road cannot be overstated; those hoping to drive or ride all the way across should have a backup plan.” As this article was going to press, the middle section of the highway, between Meishankou (梅山口) in Kaohsiung and Siangyang (向陽) in Taitung County, was still closed to outsiders
US President Donald Trump may have hoped for an impromptu talk with his old friend Kim Jong-un during a recent trip to Asia, but analysts say the increasingly emboldened North Korean despot had few good reasons to join the photo-op. Trump sent repeated overtures to Kim during his barnstorming tour of Asia, saying he was “100 percent” open to a meeting and even bucking decades of US policy by conceding that North Korea was “sort of a nuclear power.” But Pyongyang kept mum on the invitation, instead firing off missiles and sending its foreign minister to Russia and Belarus, with whom it
President William Lai (賴清德) has championed Taiwan as an “AI Island” — an artificial intelligence (AI) hub powering the global tech economy. But without major shifts in talent, funding and strategic direction, this vision risks becoming a static fortress: indispensable, yet immobile and vulnerable. It’s time to reframe Taiwan’s ambition. Time to move from a resource-rich AI island to an AI Armada. Why change metaphors? Because choosing the right metaphor shapes both understanding and strategy. The “AI Island” frames our national ambition as a static fortress that, while valuable, is still vulnerable and reactive. Shifting our metaphor to an “AI Armada”
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has a dystopian, radical and dangerous conception of itself. Few are aware of this very fundamental difference between how they view power and how the rest of the world does. Even those of us who have lived in China sometimes fall back into the trap of viewing it through the lens of the power relationships common throughout the rest of the world, instead of understanding the CCP as it conceives of itself. Broadly speaking, the concepts of the people, race, culture, civilization, nation, government and religion are separate, though often overlapping and intertwined. A government
RSS