The month of October is “pride month” for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community in Taiwan, as tens of thousands are expected to turn up at the Taiwan LGBT Pride parade (台灣同志遊行) scheduled for Saturday in Taipei.
The LGBT community can also take pride in the Taipei City Government’s increased recognition of their rights. For the first time, same-sex couples participated in a public mass wedding, usually held twice-yearly, following a push by the LGBT community and some Taipei City councilors such as the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Councilor Wang Hong-wei (王鴻薇).
“Every love deserves to be cherished,” said Taipei City Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who served as the ceremony’s presiding witness.
Photo courtesy of Chang Chia-ming
According to the Chinese-language media, 123 couples — including 10 same-sex partners — were married at the event, which was held at the University of Taipei.
When introducing the measure last month, Taipei City Deputy Mayor Chou Li-fang (周麗芳) said that LGBT rights are a human rights issue.
“We hope that all Taipei citizens can enjoy the same blessings from the Taipei City Government,” Chou said.
Photo courtesy of Chang Chia-ming
Although the ceremony is not legally binding, Chou called it a big step forward.
IT’S NOT LEGAL
Gay activist Nelson Chen (陳敬學), who held a public wedding with his boyfriend Kao Chih-wei (高治瑋) in 2006, was one of yesterday’s participants. Chen said that although he was grateful that same-sex couples were given recognition, there is still a long way to go.
“My partner and I have been married for almost 10 years, but the government still refuses to legally recognize our marriage,” Chen said. “The public mass wedding is more like a ceremonial blessing than equal treatment.”
Chen added that the government should pass an anti-discrimination act and a human rights protection basic law so as to safeguard everyone’s basic rights.
“Even the US, which is a predominately Christian, ruled in favor of marriage equality. Taiwan’s LGBT community should bravely fight for their own rights,” Chen said.
THE ‘NOT MY TAXES’ CHESTNUT
Not everyone was elated, though. The Happiness of the Next Generation Alliance (下一代幸福聯盟) was among a handful of Christian groups that condemned the admittance of same-sex couples to the ceremony.
Predictably, the alliance called on “taxpayers” to phone the 1999 Citizen Hotline and protest the government’s measure.
“We are strongly opposed to the city’s promotion of gay culture with ‘our money’ without any discussion,” the alliance wrote in an open letter.
Don’t LGBTs also pay taxes and fulfill the same obligations and responsibilities in society? Isn’t the LGBT community entitled to equal treatment?
Of the nation’s six municipalities, Taipei, Taoyuan, Taichung and Kaohsiung have promised to include same-sex couples in their public mass weddings, while New Taipei Mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫) and Tainan Mayor William Lai (賴清德) refused to adopt the measure, claiming that it is inappropriate to do so before amendments to the Civil Code (民法) are completed.
Their reasoning sounds lame.
Chu serves concurrently as the KMT’s chairman and presidential candidate, and Lai is an upcoming political star in the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) who may run for president in the future. As potential leaders of the nation, it is encumbant upon them to take a stand on marriage equality.
As we congratulate the 10 same-sex couples who made history yesterday — as well as the other 113 who deserve equal recognition — it is hoped that these symbolic ceremonies will soon transform into meaningful rights for the LGBT community throughout the nation.
US President Donald Trump may have hoped for an impromptu talk with his old friend Kim Jong-un during a recent trip to Asia, but analysts say the increasingly emboldened North Korean despot had few good reasons to join the photo-op. Trump sent repeated overtures to Kim during his barnstorming tour of Asia, saying he was “100 percent” open to a meeting and even bucking decades of US policy by conceding that North Korea was “sort of a nuclear power.” But Pyongyang kept mum on the invitation, instead firing off missiles and sending its foreign minister to Russia and Belarus, with whom it
When Taiwan was battered by storms this summer, the only crumb of comfort I could take was knowing that some advice I’d drafted several weeks earlier had been correct. Regarding the Southern Cross-Island Highway (南橫公路), a spectacular high-elevation route connecting Taiwan’s southwest with the country’s southeast, I’d written: “The precarious existence of this road cannot be overstated; those hoping to drive or ride all the way across should have a backup plan.” As this article was going to press, the middle section of the highway, between Meishankou (梅山口) in Kaohsiung and Siangyang (向陽) in Taitung County, was still closed to outsiders
President William Lai (賴清德) has championed Taiwan as an “AI Island” — an artificial intelligence (AI) hub powering the global tech economy. But without major shifts in talent, funding and strategic direction, this vision risks becoming a static fortress: indispensable, yet immobile and vulnerable. It’s time to reframe Taiwan’s ambition. Time to move from a resource-rich AI island to an AI Armada. Why change metaphors? Because choosing the right metaphor shapes both understanding and strategy. The “AI Island” frames our national ambition as a static fortress that, while valuable, is still vulnerable and reactive. Shifting our metaphor to an “AI Armada”
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has a dystopian, radical and dangerous conception of itself. Few are aware of this very fundamental difference between how they view power and how the rest of the world does. Even those of us who have lived in China sometimes fall back into the trap of viewing it through the lens of the power relationships common throughout the rest of the world, instead of understanding the CCP as it conceives of itself. Broadly speaking, the concepts of the people, race, culture, civilization, nation, government and religion are separate, though often overlapping and intertwined. A government
RSS