Taiwan in Time: Oct.19 to Oct. 25
Taiwan is one of a handful countries in the world not a member of the UN, stemming back to Oct. 25, 1971 when UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 was ratified in a two-thirds vote.
The resolution, sponsored by Albania, recognized the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as “the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations” and expelled “the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek [蔣介石] from the place which they unlawfully occupy at the United Nations and in all the organizations related to it.”
Photo: Wang Pei
The issue was that after the Chinese Civil War, the PRC under the Chinese Communist Party gained control of China, with Chiang’s Republic of China (ROC) government under the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) relegated to Taiwan and other minor islands. Yet both governments continued to claim to be the legitimate ruler of both China and Taiwan.
In fact, the ROC was a charter member of the UN, formed also this week, on Oct. 24, 1945, along with the Soviet Union, the UK and the US.
The UN General Assembly debated transferring China’s seat from the ROC to the PRC throughout the 1950s and 1960s, but the US was able to use its influence to block the move.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
As early as 1950, the UK recognized the PRC as the legitimate government of China, severing relations with the ROC. But things really started changing in the 1960s, as the PRC gained the support of a large number of newly independent nations (mostly in Asia, South America and Africa) that changed the composition of the international body. And in 1964, even France, decided to recognize the PRC.
Starting in 1961, the US and other countries would introduce a resolution every year deeming any proposal to change China’s representation an “important question” that required a two-thirds majority to pass. That resolution would pass every time, but the vote for the subsequent resolution regarding accepting the PRC became increasingly tighter, reaching a tie in 1965.
Canada established ties with the PRC in October 1970. A month later, for the first time a majority supported the PRC’s admission with a 51 to 49 vote — although still not meeting the two-thirds requirement.
Photo taken from the book ‘The KMT and The ROC’
The US had tried to propose the idea of dual representation by allowing both governments into the UN (with the PRC taking over the Security Council seat) but neither Chiang nor the PRC would likely have agreed to such an idea due to their insistence on being the sole ruler of China and Taiwan.
The US submitted a dual representation resolution in 1971 nonetheless. Albania, however, had already submitted its bid to admit the PRC and it was to be voted on first. If passed, then dual representation would be a moot point. The Americans made one last effort by proposing to remove the “expulsion of Chiang” part from Albania’s resolution, but the motion was rejected.
Before the vote, the ROC delegation announced that they would not take part in further proceedings and walked out of the General Assembly.
Photo: Wang Yi-sung, Taipei Times
On Oct. 27, Chiang officially declared the ROC’s withdrawal from the UN and its refusal to recognize the resolution.
“The United Nations has set justice aside, shamefully prostrating to evil forces and cowardly yielding to violence,” he wrote. “The United Nations that my country helped form is now a hotbed of evil, and history will prove that the Republic of China’s declaration of withdrawal will also be the declaration of the destruction of the United Nations.”
“My compatriots, the fate of our country is not in the hands of the United Nations, but in our own,” he added.
The resolution never directly mentioned the ROC or Taiwan, but the country’s bid for membership starting in the 1990s under variations of “Republic of China, Taiwan” and in 2007 as “Taiwan.”
It has continuously been rejected largely because of China’s opposition and claim that Taiwan is part of its territory and not a sovereign country.
In 2008, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) stopped applying as part of his “diplomatic truce” policy toward China, but Taiwanese-Americans continue to protest outside the UN Headquarters in New York each year.
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
The second expedition of Commodore Matthew Perry of the US to Japan in 1854 sent ships to Formosa on the way back to the US to assess Keelung’s potential as a coaling station. Far-sighted, Perry recommended that the US establish a presence on Formosa, as Taiwan was then known. His suggestion went unheeded, but others were watching, few more closely than Prussia. The Prussians had wanted to follow up the Americans with an expedition of their own. In 1858, when William I became regent, the idea of entering the colonial race in the Far East began to take shape in the
To the consternation of its biological father — China — the young nation of Taiwan seems to prefer its step-dad, Japan. When the latter was forced out, a semi-modernized iteration of the former returned. And just as some people thrive as adults, despite an unstable childhood, Taiwan has become a democratic success. Unfortunately, the island’s biological father behaves like a parent who is no use, yet who continues to meddle. A combination of rose-tinted retrospection and growing mutual respect has given many Taiwanese a highly positive attitude toward Japan. Physical reminders of the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule are treasured,
Born in Aldershot in 1959, Russell Foster is a professor of circadian neuroscience at Oxford and the director of the Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology. For his discovery of non-rod, non-cone ocular photoreceptors he received numerous awards including the Zoological Society scientific medal. His latest book — the first he has written without a co-author — is Life Time: The New Science of the Body Clock, and How It Can Revolutionize Your Sleep and Health. The Guardian: What is circadian neuroscience? Russell Foster: It’s the fundamental understanding of how our biology ticks on a 24-hour basis. But also it’s bigger than that —
How does Hong Kong look to people born in the year of the handover — for whom the city has always been under Chinese sovereignty? Some feel their fate is tied to Hong Kong’s, while others feel like bystanders as Beijing tightens its grip. Many plan to leave sooner or later. We spoke to six 24 and 25-year-olds about the Hong Kong they grew up in, and the one they expect to exist in another 25 years. THE RETURNING PROFESSIONAL “I feel helpless witnessing the changes that Hong Kong has been through,” said Keanne Lee. “At the same time, I want to keep