On Aug. 1, 28 same-sex couples attempted to register their marriages at Taipei’s Zhongzheng Household Registration Office (中正區戶政事務所) on the eve of Chinese Valentine’s Day. And to no surprise, the office rejected their marriage registrations, because same-sex marriage is not yet allowed in Taiwan.
In response, the Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights (TAPCPR, 伴侶盟) emphasized that the right to marriage is a basic human right protected by the Constitution. “The nation cannot and shall not deprive same-sex couples of their right to get married,” said the alliance, which organized the group registration.
The rejection is a reminder of the Legislative Yuan’s delay in putting the draft bill for marriage equality (婚姻平權草案) on its agenda. Last year, seven opposition legislators jointly proposed the draft bill to amend the Civil Code. But Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators Liao Cheng-ching (廖正井) and Lu Hsueh-chang (呂學樟) — co-chairs of the legislature’s Judiciary and Organic Laws and Statutes Committee (司法及法制委員會) — have not scheduled meetings to review it to this day, and they seem to have no intention of doing so. Liao even signed a petition against the amendment and threatened to block it at the KMT’s Central Standing Committee meeting. This dereliction of duty is absolutely unacceptable.
Photo: Wang Yi-sung, Taipei Times
As the year-end elections are only three months away, perhaps it is a good time for us to examine some major candidates’ stances on marriage equality. Take the Taipei mayoral hopefuls for example. Thwarted primary candidate Ting Shou-chung (丁守中) of the KMT is the most hostile to the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community. As vice president of the Buddha’s Light International Association, ROC (國際佛光會中華總會), Ting actively participated in a large anti-gay demonstration in November last year and gave a speech at the rally against same-sex marriage.
“We respect homosexuals, but exceptions should not become the norm,” said Ting before the anti-gay demonstration.
“The amendment to the Civil Code will destroy family ethics, and such a threat to Taiwan’s traditional family values is intolerable,” the lawmaker added, pledging to make all efforts to block the draft bill.
Photo: Chang Chia-ming, Taipei Times
Ironically, he repeatedly stressed in his campaign advertisements that he was a candidate with an “international view” because he obtained a PhD from Tufts University in the US. Is he unaware that Massachusetts, where the school is located, was the first US state to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples over a decade ago? Did he learn nothing from the state?
The LGBT community was initially relieved when Ting was defeated by former Taipei EasyCard Corp (悠遊卡公司) chairman Sean Lien (連勝文) in the KMT’s primary. Lien has said that he is strongly opposed to any discrimination against homosexuals and that the legalization of same-sex marriage is up for discussion, but he has refused to support gay marriage to this day and his logic sounds odd to me. Isn’t the deprivation of certain people’s marriage rights based on their sexual orientation a kind of discrimination? That being so, shouldn’t he support marriage equality because he is strongly opposed to any discrimination?
Actually, Lien has repeatedly refused to receive representatives of the Taiwan International Association for Gay Rights (同權會) and other LGBT groups ever since he was nominated in April, but he has been shaking hands with religious leaders notorious for their oppression of homosexuality. During a live question-and-answer campaign event on Facebook earlier this month, he intentionally skipped all the questions about marriage equality proposed by netizens. How long will he continue to avoid the issue?
Meanwhile, independent candidate Neil Peng (馮光遠) is the friendliest to the LGBT community. Peng is a co-scriptwriter of director Ang Lee’s (李安) 1993 film, The Wedding Banquet (喜宴), the first mainstream gay movie in Taiwan. Soon after social group Watchout (沃草) called on all the candidates to express their views on marriage equality, he was the first to show support.
“I always take actions to support marriage equality and even served as a chief witness at a wedding ceremony for a gay couple on Feb. 28 this year,” Peng said, promising to keep participating in Taipei’s gay parade every year, revise school textbooks to increase students’ understanding of the issue and lobby the legislature to pass the draft bill promptly.
As for independent candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who is backed by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), he drew some criticism at first.
On Feb. 8, Ko told the Storm Media Group (風傳媒) that he planned to cast an “invalid vote” (廢票) on marriage equality, claiming that the law already covered most of the rights of gays and lesbians. The physician also used the contentious and pejorative word “mutation” (突變) to describe them, instead of the word “variation” (變異) that is commonly used. But Ko quickly learned from the LGBT community and made a U-turn on the issue. When attending a music festival held to mark the 228 Incident three weeks later, he walked to the stand of the TAPCPR at the event to show his support for marriage equality and signed a postcard at the stand to urge the legislature to put the draft bill on its agenda soon.
Interestingly, DPP Chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) also attended the event and showed her support. As she wrote on a postcard, “To legislators: Please support the draft bill for marriage equality, and put it on your agenda for discussion as soon as possible.”
Can President and KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Lien learn from Tsai and Ko in a timely manner before the Nov. 29 elections? Let’s wait and see.
June 23 to June 29 After capturing the walled city of Hsinchu on June 22, 1895, the Japanese hoped to quickly push south and seize control of Taiwan’s entire west coast — but their advance was stalled for more than a month. Not only did local Hakka fighters continue to cause them headaches, resistance forces even attempted to retake the city three times. “We had planned to occupy Anping (Tainan) and Takao (Kaohsiung) as soon as possible, but ever since we took Hsinchu, nearby bandits proclaiming to be ‘righteous people’ (義民) have been destroying train tracks and electrical cables, and gathering in villages
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
Swooping low over the banks of a Nile River tributary, an aid flight run by retired American military officers released a stream of food-stuffed sacks over a town emptied by fighting in South Sudan, a country wracked by conflict. Last week’s air drop was the latest in a controversial development — private contracting firms led by former US intelligence officers and military veterans delivering aid to some of the world’s deadliest conflict zones, in operations organized with governments that are combatants in the conflicts. The moves are roiling the global aid community, which warns of a more militarized, politicized and profit-seeking trend
RSS