Chi Chia-wei’s (祁家威) eyes light up as he recounts his life as Taiwan’s pioneering gay activist. But underlying his buoyant remembrance lays a palpable sense of fear, as though he’s expecting the police to show up and kick down the door.
During the Martial Law era, when any kind of dissent was muzzled or crushed, Chi came out publicly and started a one-man gay rights campaign. In 1986, the then 28-year-old filed a petition with the Legislative Yuan demanding equal marriage rights for same-sex couples.
He was immediately arrested.
Photo: Ho Yi, Taipei Times
“I was locked up in the same jail as [former president] Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and [democracy pioneer] Deng Nan-jung (鄭南榕) … I served five months; they served seven,” the 58-year old activist recalls.
After his release, Chi devoted himself to HIV/AIDS prevention and care. He volunteered to work with medical professionals and hit the streets to canvas for donations. He bought hundreds of thousands of condoms a year, handed them out in areas across Taipei and gave them to the city’s licensed sex workers. He set up a free HIV testing service to hundreds of people annually, while running a small hospice for patients with the virus.
Chi says the nation’s intelligence agency continues to keep close tabs on him because, whether authoritarian or democratic, the state cannot tolerate “those who organize and assemble.”
Photo: Victoria Hsu and Ho Yi, Taipei Times
“I always tell people to be careful if they want to report about me,” the gaunt Chi warned as we concluded our interview.
Twenty-seven years after the lifting of martial law, Taiwan’s turbulent past is still clearly present in Chi’s mind, even as the country has become one of the most gay-friendly in Asia. The government no longer rounds up gay activists, and recent polls indicate that more than half of respondents support legal recognition of same-sex unions. Indeed, recent proposed amendments to Article 972 of the Civil Code that would make same-sex unions possible have been forwarded to the Legislative Yuan for review.
Unlike the past, the government no longer suppresses gay rights. Today, challenges to gay rights comes from elsewhere.
Anti-gay Demonstrations
On Nov. 30 last year, tens of thousands of people rallied on Ketagalan Boulevard in front of the Presidential Office, voicing their opposition to legalizing same-sex marriage. The main force behind the demonstration was the Alliance of Religious Groups for the Love of Families Taiwan (台灣宗教團體愛護家庭大聯盟), a movement composed of Christian organizations, Buddhist sects, the Chinese Regional Bishops’ Conference (天主教會台灣地區主教團) and I-Kuan Tao (一貫道) — a religious movement that combines Confucianism, Taoism and Chinese Buddhism, and recognizes non-Chinese religious traditions such as Christianity and Islam.
It was one of the largest mobilizations of Taiwan’s religious groups in recent years. There were reportedly hundreds of security staff. Those gay advocates who showed up were subjected to abuse and driven away. In the weeks leading up to the protest, ministers preached homophobic sermons, asking their congregation to support the alliance-initiated signature drive against same-sex marriage and join the demonstration, says Chen Hsiao-en (陳小恩), secretary of the Tong-Kwang Light House Presbyterian Church (同光同志長老教會), whose members and clergy consist mainly of gay men and lesbians.
“Our church was packed to capacity during those weeks,” Chen Hsiao-en says, highlighting fears felt by the gay community leading up to the demonstrations.
“Newcomers would burst out crying, saying that they couldn’t take it anymore... One gay Christian thought his church would unconditionally love and accept him, but as soon as he came out to the pastor, he was rejected. Many [gay people] left their churches, heartbroken, after the demonstration on Nov. 30.”
For members of the religious alliance, however, the demonstration was a triumph — one that successfully pressured the legislature to halt the amendment to Article 972.
“Public opinion has to change, so we stepped forward. Now lawmakers and the media know our religious groups are against [same-sex marriage]. City councilors, mayors or the president — no matter what their elected office, they follow the voters. We are great in number, so let’s see who they will listen to,” says Paul Chang (張全鋒), vice president of the Unification Church Taiwan and one the alliance’s spokesmen.
‘Moral Taliban’
Religious opposition to same-sex unions is, in fact, shepherded by those who represent a small minority of the country’s population. Chen Chih-hung (陳志宏), a Taiwan Lutheran Church (基督教台灣信義會) bishop who also serves as the alliance’s spokesman, says that Christian churches are the driving force behind the crusade.
“To a certain extent, Christian groups take the lead on this issue since Asian religions haven’t traditionally seen homosexuality as a big deal. Churches in the US and Europe have confronted the impact of gay marriage directly… Since only a small percentage of Taiwanese are Christians, we share what we know with other religions so that they understand the seriousness of the situation,” Chen Chih-hung says.
According to statistics compiled by the Ministry of the Interior last year, Taiwan, a country composed of predominantly Buddhist and Taoist worshippers, has nearly 580,000 Protestants and Catholics. So the crusade against same-sex marriage is something of a foreign transplant.
“Christian churches in Taiwan are informed by churches abroad about what gay activists have been doing here… We lack experience. They have told us how serious the issue is and what strategies [gay rights advocates] deploy,” Chen Chih-hung says.
The clergyman says a large amount of information about how to combat gay rights issues comes from a global network of organizations, including The Society for Truth and Light (明光社), a conservative Christian pressure group based in Hong Kong and dubbed the “moral Taliban” by its detractors.
Focus on the Family, headquartered in the US city of Colorado Springs, is another institute promoting a conservative Christian agenda internationally. It has an office in South Africa, considered part of the American Christian operations whose role in the recent anti-gay legislation in Africa has been widely reported. Focus on the Family has a branch in Taipei called Loving Family (愛家基金會).
Dubious logic
For this global network of Christian organizations, society is built on the institution of marriage, which can only be between a man and a woman. All forms of sexual activity outside the heterosexual institution are considered dangerous and sinful.
“Same-sex unions cannot lead to marriage. They are a form of promiscuity like adultery, rape and prostitution… Since promiscuity is a sin, demanding human rights [for gay people] doesn’t make sense,” Chang says.
“The biggest problem is that homosexuals can’t produce offspring. But that’s what human society is built on,” Chang adds.
It is a sentiment echoed by Chen Chih-hung.
“Following the logic of gay marriage, where any two persons who are in love can get married, we quickly run into a very practical problem: incest. Brothers can marry sisters, so too can fathers marry daughters, mothers marry sons,” Chen says.
The fear-mongering is put into local context in an observation made by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Yu Mei-nu (尤美女), who helped to forward to the legislature the amendments to Article 972 of the Civil Code drafted by the Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights (台灣伴侶權益推動聯盟).
‘Dictatorship of Lechery’
The Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights has also put forth two other bills that recognize partnership rights for all couples, irrespective of gender, and allow diverse forms of family to include members not related by blood. Their advocacy, together with the continuous effort by women’s groups such as the Awakening Foundation (婦女新知基金會) to decriminalize adultery — a criminal offense punishable by a jail sentence of up to 12 months — has caused panic among religious conservatives, Yu says.
“They connect all these things together and come up with a conspiracy theory, believing that the calls for decriminalization of adultery, together with same-sex unions and diverse forms of family, are intended to ultimately destroy families and society,” says Yu, a veteran woman’s rights advocate and supporter of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) rights.
In a completely different tone, both Chang and Chen Chih-hung speak of a dark, hidden agenda of the LGBT movement in Taiwan. The most active elements of the movement, they say, are not gay rights activists but libertines, with LGBT equality only part of their mission. The ultimate goal is to replace the institution of marriage and family with a culture of sexual promiscuity.
Their views are reflected in a short video widely circulated on the internet prior to the Nov. 30 protest. Titled Sexual liberation is storming Taiwan (性解放風暴即將襲台), the video is designed to ignite anxiety and fear by stigmatizing gay people and their supporters as proponents of promiscuity, group sex and bestiality.
“Taiwan is the first place in Asia they [the libertines] want to gain control of,” the two spokesmen say in separate interviews.
By focusing on LGBT advocates as sexual deviants, rather than preaching that homosexuality as a sin, which would find little resonance in Taiwanese society, the Christian minority generates a much greater response from worried parents and other concerned citizens. And that is exactly the strategy adopted for last year’s anti-gay marriage law rally, which was disguised under the banner “Think of the Children.”
In light of what they believe a successful mobilization to show off their political strength, the anti-LGBT alliance regards political lobbying through all levels of government as one of their main tasks. Chang says that they will continue to oppose the enactment of laws allowing same-sex unions as well as the passage of anti-discrimination laws aimed at curtailing discrimination against members of LGBT communities.
“If denouncing homosexuality counts as a form of discrimination, then what will happen to school teachers, clergy, priests and monks? Are they going to lose their jobs or go to jail for criticizing gays and lesbians? This is an abuse of the law, a violation of religious freedom. This is what I call the dictatorship of lechery,” Chang says.
The second part of this feature will appear in tomorrow’s edition.
On April 26, The Lancet published a letter from two doctors at Taichung-based China Medical University Hospital (CMUH) warning that “Taiwan’s Health Care System is on the Brink of Collapse.” The authors said that “Years of policy inaction and mismanagement of resources have led to the National Health Insurance system operating under unsustainable conditions.” The pushback was immediate. Errors in the paper were quickly identified and publicized, to discredit the authors (the hospital apologized). CNA reported that CMUH said the letter described Taiwan in 2021 as having 62 nurses per 10,000 people, when the correct number was 78 nurses per 10,000
As we live longer, our risk of cognitive impairment is increasing. How can we delay the onset of symptoms? Do we have to give up every indulgence or can small changes make a difference? We asked neurologists for tips on how to keep our brains healthy for life. TAKE CARE OF YOUR HEALTH “All of the sensible things that apply to bodily health apply to brain health,” says Suzanne O’Sullivan, a consultant in neurology at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery in London, and the author of The Age of Diagnosis. “When you’re 20, you can get away with absolute
May 5 to May 11 What started out as friction between Taiwanese students at Taichung First High School and a Japanese head cook escalated dramatically over the first two weeks of May 1927. It began on April 30 when the cook’s wife knew that lotus starch used in that night’s dinner had rat feces in it, but failed to inform staff until the meal was already prepared. The students believed that her silence was intentional, and filed a complaint. The school’s Japanese administrators sided with the cook’s family, dismissing the students as troublemakers and clamping down on their freedoms — with
As Donald Trump’s executive order in March led to the shuttering of Voice of America (VOA) — the global broadcaster whose roots date back to the fight against Nazi propaganda — he quickly attracted support from figures not used to aligning themselves with any US administration. Trump had ordered the US Agency for Global Media, the federal agency that funds VOA and other groups promoting independent journalism overseas, to be “eliminated to the maximum extent consistent with applicable law.” The decision suddenly halted programming in 49 languages to more than 425 million people. In Moscow, Margarita Simonyan, the hardline editor-in-chief of the
RSS