During Beijing’s gridlocked rush hours, do the city’s car-owning multitudes ponder who is responsible for the gray skies choking their city and lungs? With 5.4 million cars on the capital’s roads today, and another 1 million expected by 2016, it would seem like a natural question to ask. Yet despite traffic that appears to worsen by the week, and pollution that certifiably worsens by the year, Chinese drivers don’t seem to be taking much interest in what their role might be in causing — and abating — air pollution.
To an extent, that’s understandable. Visuals aside, good public data on the extent of Beijing’s air pollution only became available in early 2012, and even then nobody could say for sure — or at least publicly — what role private car ownership played in creating the city’s smog. Anecdotally at least, most city residents seem to accept that it plays a major role, especially after strict traffic restrictions (including banning half of all registered private cars from the roads on any given day) during the 2008 Beijing Olympics produced epic blue skies and improved human health for several weeks.
Yet, despite the success of these measures, Chinese haven’t lost their enthusiasm for car ownership. According to Xinhua, the state-owned newswire, between 2009 and 2013 the vehicle population of Beijing rose 35 percent, from 4 million to 5.49 million (and that doesn’t count the number of vehicles registered elsewhere but plying the city’s roads). All the while, residents have increased their demands — mostly via online forums — for the government to do something, anything, about improving air quality.
Photo: REUTERS
Of course, China’s air pollution problems aren’t just related to automobiles. In advance of 2008, authorities relocated, cleaned up and shut down polluting industrial facilities and dust-generating construction sites, too. No statistics on the extent of that clean-up have ever been released, and thus the question of how much industry was and is responsible for China’s air pollution woes has remained a matter of public speculation, and low-profile scientific investigation.
The question broke into the open on Dec. 30, when the Chinese Academy of Sciences released a study claiming that automobile exhaust was responsible for only 4 percent of the most harmful type of air pollutants emitted in the city. Of the traceable point sources of air pollution, industrial pollution played the largest role, with a 26 percent contribution, followed by coal combustion, at 18 percent.
The reaction to the study was swift, outraged and data- driven. A widely circulated story issued by Xinhua, the state-owned newswire, quoted experts debunking the study. The Beijing Environmental Protection Bureau, for example, provided undated data suggesting that car exhaust actually contributes 24.5 percent of Beijing’s most dangerous air pollution. Meanwhile, Pan Tao, president of the Beijing Municipal Research Institute of Environmental Protection, told People’s Daily online that not only was the 4 percent number too low, but that “there can be no doubt that motor vehicle emissions are a major source of air pollution in Beijing.”
Not all of these vehicles pollute equally: The Beijing Municipal Environmental Monitoring Center reports that heavy diesel vehicles — 5 percent of the vehicles in the city — contribute roughly 50 percent of the city’s nitric oxide pollution (a problem that could be solved, in part, if China were willing to invest in refineries capable of producing cleaner-burning diesel).
In a modest response, Chinese officials at various levels are implementing restrictions on car purchases and limiting the days that cars can be driven on roads. These approaches — requiring sacrifice on the part of China’s car owners — have not, generally, gone over well. On Dec. 22, for example, the city of Tianjin, a large and growing metropolis east of Beijing, announced traffic restrictions to deal with heavy smog. Almost immediately, city residents began to object online and — only hours after they were announced — the restrictions were retracted. Two days later, the state-owned Global Times newspaper, taking note of the Tianjin failure and similar incidents in other cities, complained: “Public opinion stresses that it is the government’s responsibility to bring the blue sky back and such a responsibility has nothing to do with ordinary people.”
Three days later, the paper once again took up the cause of personal responsibility, writing: “At this stage in China, people care more about chasing a comfortable lifestyle featured by high consumption and high energy intensity, rather than saving the environment.”
This attitude, especially coming from a state-owned newspaper, might be viewed as self-serving. After all, if pollution is the people’s fault, then it’s not the Party’s fault. In reality, the government, industry and China’s voracious middle class all share responsibility for China’s murky skies. Until China develops a citizen-driven movement to practice conservation or — at least — some self-restraint, the best efforts of the other two parties will inevitably come to naught.
Jason Han says that the e-arrival card spat between South Korea and Taiwan shows that Seoul is signaling adherence to its “one-China” policy, while Taiwan’s response reflects a reciprocal approach. “Attempts to alter the diplomatic status quo often lead to tit-for-tat responses,” the analyst on international affairs tells the Taipei Times, adding that Taiwan may become more cautious in its dealings with South Korea going forward. Taipei has called on Seoul to correct its electronic entry system, which currently lists Taiwan as “China (Taiwan),” warning that reciprocal measures may follow if the wording is not changed before March 31. As of yesterday,
The Portuguese never established a presence on Taiwan, but they must have traded with the indigenous people because later traders reported that the locals referred to parts of deer using Portuguese words. What goods might the Portuguese have offered their indigenous trade partners? Among them must have been slaves, for the Portuguese dealt slaves across Asia. Though we often speak of “Portuguese” ships, imagining them as picturesque vessels manned by pointy-bearded Iberians, in Asia Portuguese shipping between local destinations was crewed by Asian seamen, with a handful of white or Eurasian officers. “Even the great carracks of 1,000-2,000 tons which plied
It’s only half the size of its more famous counterpart in Taipei, but the Botanical Garden of the National Museum of Nature Science (NMNS, 國立自然科學博物館植物園) is surely one of urban Taiwan’s most inviting green spaces. Covering 4.5 hectares immediately northeast of the government-run museum in Taichung’s North District (北區), the garden features more than 700 plant species, many of which are labeled in Chinese but not in English. Since its establishment in 1999, the site’s managers have done their best to replicate a number of native ecosystems, dividing the site into eight areas. The name of the Coral Atoll Zone might
Nuclear power is getting a second look in Southeast Asia as countries prepare to meet surging energy demand as they vie for artificial intelligence-focused data centers. Several Southeast Asian nations are reviving mothballed nuclear plans and setting ambitious targets and nearly half of the region could, if they pursue those goals, have nuclear energy in the 2030s. Even countries without current plans have signaled their interest. Southeast Asia has never produced a single watt of nuclear energy, despite long-held atomic ambitions. But that may soon change as pressure mounts to reduce emissions that contribute to climate change, while meeting growing power needs. The
RSS