Rhythm, lines and Turkish tradition are among the words used to describe the art of Devrim Erbil, a key figure in the development of modern Turkish painting whose artistic career has spanned more than half a century. The National Museum of History (國立歷史博物館) is currently holding an exhibition, Poetical Abstraction From Istanbul (詩意的抽象—來自伊斯坦堡), of work by the internationally-renowned artist, including recent abstract paintings and textile-art, that eloquently illustrate his preoccupations with motifs such as birds, trees, rhythmic composition and the cityscapes of Istanbul.
Born in 1937 in the carpet-weaving province of Usak, Central Anatolia, Erbil studied painting at the respected State Academy of Fine Arts in Istanbul during the 1950s, and soon garnered recognition as an abstract painter at home and abroad. A prolific artist who, at the age of 76, still reportedly works seven to 12 hours a day, Erbil has also served as an academic at several art institutions in Turkey and helped to influence a younger generation of Turkish artists.
Although trained in the abstract tradition of European masters such as Paul Klee and Piet Mondrian, Erbil nevertheless seeks inspiration in the culture, tradition and landscapes of Turkey, particularly Anatolia, the Asian part of the nation. He renders Istanbul in intricate lines and shapes and always from an aerial perspective. From a distance, the city’s maze of streets, mosques and the Bosphorus, a strait that is part of the border separating Europe and Asia, appear sketched or engraved on the canvas and often painted in vibrant colors of red, green and Turkish blue. A closer look, however, reveals an immense complexity composed of straight and broken lines, curves and their variations in various hues.
Photo courtesy of the Turkish Trade Office in Taipei
Erbil’s abstract paintings are also suffused with images of nature. Subjects like the flapping of a bird’s wings or the branches and leaves of a tree, which seem to expand and grow to infinity, are often unrecognizable, while a sense of rhythmic motion and dynamism is deeply felt in the artist’s intricately detailed rendering.
Believing that art is made for sharing, Erbil has worked with a variety of media that ranges from mosaics, ceramics and stained glass to tapestry. Among them, Anatolian carpet occupies a special position in the creative world of Erbil, who once said that carpets are the Turks gift to humanity. Several of Erbil’s textile-art works that adopt ancient weaving techniques are on display at the museum, aiming to change the viewer’s ideas of carpets not only as a piece of decoration on the floor but as an artwork that can be hung on the wall.
■ National Museum of History (國立歷史博物館), 49 Nanhai Rd, Taipei City (台北市南海路49號), tel: (02) 2361-0270. Open Tuesdays to Sundays from 10am to 6pm. General admission: NT$30. On the Net: www.nmh.gov.tw
Photo courtesy of the Turkish Trade Office in Taipei
■ Until Oct. 2
Photo courtesy of the Turkish Trade Office in Taipei
Photo courtesy of the Turkish Trade Office in Taipei
Oct. 27 to Nov. 2 Over a breakfast of soymilk and fried dough costing less than NT$400, seven officials and engineers agreed on a NT$400 million plan — unaware that it would mark the beginning of Taiwan’s semiconductor empire. It was a cold February morning in 1974. Gathered at the unassuming shop were Economics minister Sun Yun-hsuan (孫運璿), director-general of Transportation and Communications Kao Yu-shu (高玉樹), Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) president Wang Chao-chen (王兆振), Telecommunications Laboratories director Kang Pao-huang (康寶煌), Executive Yuan secretary-general Fei Hua (費驊), director-general of Telecommunications Fang Hsien-chi (方賢齊) and Radio Corporation of America (RCA) Laboratories director Pan
The consensus on the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chair race is that Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) ran a populist, ideological back-to-basics campaign and soundly defeated former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), the candidate backed by the big institutional players. Cheng tapped into a wave of popular enthusiasm within the KMT, while the institutional players’ get-out-the-vote abilities fell flat, suggesting their power has weakened significantly. Yet, a closer look at the race paints a more complicated picture, raising questions about some analysts’ conclusions, including my own. TURNOUT Here is a surprising statistic: Turnout was 130,678, or 39.46 percent of the 331,145 eligible party
President William Lai (賴清德) has championed Taiwan as an “AI Island” — an artificial intelligence (AI) hub powering the global tech economy. But without major shifts in talent, funding and strategic direction, this vision risks becoming a static fortress: indispensable, yet immobile and vulnerable. It’s time to reframe Taiwan’s ambition. Time to move from a resource-rich AI island to an AI Armada. Why change metaphors? Because choosing the right metaphor shapes both understanding and strategy. The “AI Island” frames our national ambition as a static fortress that, while valuable, is still vulnerable and reactive. Shifting our metaphor to an “AI Armada”
The classic warmth of a good old-fashioned izakaya beckons you in, all cozy nooks and dark wood finishes, as tables order a third round and waiters sling tapas-sized bites and assorted — sometimes unidentifiable — skewered meats. But there’s a romantic hush about this Ximending (西門町) hotspot, with cocktails savored, plating elegant and never rushed and daters and diners lit by candlelight and chandelier. Each chair is mismatched and the assorted tables appear to be the fanciest picks from a nearby flea market. A naked sewing mannequin stands in a dimly lit corner, adorned with antique mirrors and draped foliage
RSS