Entering the Huashan 1914 Creative Park hall on Saturday night that is home to Horse’s (驫舞劇場) Successor (繼承者) for the next two weeks, the first thing I noticed was a path made up of bits and pieces of computer motherboards that ended in a large teardrop shape. There were also huge walls of stacked newspapers, a constellation of Styrofoam balls suspended on varying lengths of black wire, a sculpture of chairs balanced on end almost to the ceiling, two huge metal platform structures, a curtain made up of recycled advertising banners, pairs of wooden panels, collections of wooden boxes, and in one corner, an arrangement of eight small benches.
One thing there wasn’t was someplace for audience members to sit. The benches were obviously not for the audience, for in addition to their small number, dancer and Horse co-founder Chou Shu-yi (周書毅) was sitting on one of them. The other eight dancers — Chou Chun-peng (周浚鵬), Huang Yong-huai (黃詠淮), Huang Hai-te (黃懷德), Wang Jin-dun (王敬惇), Derrick Wei (魏雋展), Liu Guan-xiang (劉冠詳), Shai Tamir and Mauro Sacchi — were dotted about the space.
Many in the audience milled about, confused by the lack of seating. Gradually the dancers all assembled in Chou’s corner and the program began, as usual in Horse productions, with a bit of dancing and a bit of slapstick. Then they split up again, leaving Chou to his corner and benches, where he would remain for the rest of the 70-minute show. The rest spread out, singlely and in pairs, and the audience had to choose whom to follow and watch.
Photo courtesy of horse
The eight dancers roamed the hall, moving in and about the audience, sometimes very close, completely breaking the boundaries that usually separate the audience from the performer. The one exception was Chou — people stayed a respectful distance from him and the benches. I wondered what would have changed with his performance if one or more audience members had decided to sit on one of the benches.
One other interesting thing about Chou was that, although compared to the others he often wasn’t doing much at all, he still managed to attract large segments of the audience, even when the shouts and noise from the other ends of the hall would, one thought, have drawn people away. But that is Chou’s charisma as a performer — even when he’s moving slowly, he draws you in.
For the others, often their performances — including some dialogue — sometimes seemed like a performance of “Men on the verge of a nervous breakdown,” but in a fun way. Tamir, especially, was fascinating to watch.
A masters dissertation or doctoral thesis could be written about Successor and the audience movement patterns. It was as much fun to watch the audience as it was the performers — people would get so wrapped up by what was in front of them that they were oblivious to what was going on right behind them. However, such a free-form experiment was not for everyone, and there were several who were obviously less than enthralled: people checked their phone or sat talking on the floor. And then there was the one woman entertaining herself by making shadow puppets on one wall of newspapers until a friend pulled her away.
Overall, the first weekend of Successor was a success. I can’t wait to see what the men of Horse do next weekend and the following one. The shows for each of the three weekends are supposed to be completely different, and you don’t have to have seen one to see the others. The second set of shows start on Thursday night.
The two dance productions that I saw on Saturday both had Westerners among the dancers, and in the case of the matinee, 8213 Physical Dance Theater’s (8213 肢體舞蹈劇場) Unsigned Season (極境之旅), a Malaysian-Chinese dancer as well. 8213 were at their “home theater” — the black box that is the Guling St. Avant-Garde Theatre (牯嶺街小劇場).The show, choreographed by Casey Avaunt, explored how humans react to climate change, disasters and uncertainty.
It was a terrific collection of vignettes that gave each of the dancers — Avaunt, company founder Sun Chuo-tai (孫梲泰), Yogi (Chan Tien-chen, 詹天甄), Liu Yen-meng (劉彥萌), Yang Hsiu-ju (楊琇如), Lim Kok Ta (林志駿) and Jordan Brooks — a chance to shine on their own in a solo or duet. Brooks’ solo was ethereal, his arms appeared lighter than air.
While the show featured the troupe’s trademark comedic moments, it was well thought out and obviously thought-provoking for many in the audience, judging by the question and answer session that followed the show.
Special kudos go to musician and composer Jimi Chen (陳世興), who from his corner platform was a complete one-man band, if not orchestra. He has worked on several of the company’s productions and it was great to actually be able to see him performing.
Summer isn’t the best time of year for high-altitude treks. At lower altitudes, however, there’s no shortage of short leg-stretchers that’ll get you immersed in nature without leaving you prostrate with heat exhaustion. Here are three in the south. THE SIRAYA HEARTLAND If this set of trails has an official name, I’ve not been able to discover it. But it seems that this patch of woodland, 14 km inland from central Tainan, is supervised by Sinhua Forest Area (新化林場), which itself belongs to National Chung Hsing University (國立中興大學). I associate the area with the Siraya people, an indigenous ethnic group still fighting
It can take ice cream maker Miky Wu (吳書瑀) months to create a new flavor. In addition to using only eco-friendly and organic ingredients, her brand 1982 de glacee also eschews artificial additives, replacing emulsifiers and stabilizers with Taiwanese rice and wood ear derivatives. Wu’s non-traditional methods and dedication to capturing the essence of the main ingredient can lead to hours and hours tinkering in her “research office” in Tainan, even referencing academic papers to get the science correct. Her efforts were recently recognized for the third year in a row by the prestigious A. A. Taste Awards run by the
June 29 to July 5 With women gathering rocks and men hurling them at thousands of rivaling neighbors, ritualistic stone battles were regular affairs for people living in Pingtung during the 1800s. Direct combat and use of weapons were prohibited to avoid serious injury, with the losers hosting the winners for dinner. These “guests” often acted rudely, and faced no repercussions for smashing windows or snatching their hosts’ possessions. These battles usually took place yearly, with a significant number happening every Dragon Boat Festival. The winners had rights to the losers’ banquet prepared for the festivities. Sometimes things would get out of
Certain historical statues have been disappearing in Thailand, but they are not effigies of colonialists or slave owners torn down by protesters. Instead, Thailand’s vanishing monuments celebrated leaders of the 1932 revolution that ended absolute monarchy in Thailand, who were once officially honored as national heroes and symbols of democracy. Reuters has identified at least six sites memorializing the People’s Party that led the revolution which have been removed or renamed in the past year. In most cases it is not known who took the statues down, although a military official said one was removed for new landscaping. Two army camps named after 1932