Of all the American leaders who were assassinated in the 1960s, that decade of turmoil and revolt, Malcolm X has enjoyed the greatest upturn in posthumous fortune. In the pantheon of black American protest figures only Martin Luther King occupies a more exalted position, but it is Malcolm X whose legend has the greater street credibility and aura of cool. It’s he who was the subject of Spike Lee’s biopic starring Denzel Washington, and it is Malcolm, not Martin, who today is cited by radicals and rap stars.
Yet Malcolm Little, as he was born, was a petty thief and a pimp who found salvation in the Nation of Islam, a bizarre cult led by a mountebank and sexual predator named Elijah Muhammad. Muhammad preached that white people were a race of devils created 6,000 years ago by an evil scientist named Yakub. As Muhammad’s leading minister, Malcolm X rejected the civil rights movement, labeled King a “house Negro,” and formed liaisons with the Ku Klux Klan and the American Nazi party — organizations that he found preferable to mainstream political parties.
Although the Nation of Islam continually boasted of its willingness to defend itself and by extension the black community, it reserved its fire power for its own members, severely beating anyone who stepped out of line, and killing those (like Malcolm himself) who were deemed a threat to Muhammad. Malcolm X knew this, but he stayed loyal to the cause for the better part of his adulthood — only breaking from the Nation of Islam in his last year of life, when he was kicked out in an internal power play.
How and why has death treated him so well? One reason is the Autobiography of Malcolm X, a memoir ghosted by Alex Haley, who later wrote the Afro-American blockbuster Roots. The autobiography sold more than 6 million copies in the 10 years following Malcolm’s murder by Nation of Islam hitmen in 1965, and continues to be a key revolutionary text. A gripping mixture of urban confessional and political manifesto, it not only inspired a generation of black activists, but drove home the bitter realities of racism to a mainstream white liberal audience.
But if the book’s success established Malcolm’s legacy, it also created a myth that deterred a more stringent analysis of his life and work. Now, almost a half century on, Malcolm has finally received the biography that his unique role in black and global resistance culture demands.
Manning Marable, who died on April 1 after a long illness, was professor of history and political science at Columbia University and was steeped in African-American studies. He has left a meticulous, comprehensive and fair-minded portrait of both Malcolm and the turbulent period of American history in which he lived. We learn that the “Detroit Red” image of Malcolm as a street hoodlum was exaggerated in the autobiography, the better to dramatize his conversion to the law-abiding but society-rejecting doctrine of Muhammad’s Nation of Islam.
Long before multiculturalism entered the language of political discourse, Malcolm explored its logical endpoint of ethnic and cultural separation — which helps explain his collusion with far-right white racists, including meetings with the Ku Klux Klan and verbal support for Nazis. But as Marable shows, he was adept at tailoring his message to different audiences, often blatantly contradicting on a Wednesday what he had clearly and emotively stated on a Monday.
Not the least of Malcolm’s flaws was his attitude to women, and his wife in particular. Betty Shabazz was abandoned in her home for the greater part of her marriage, including the period during which Malcolm and his family were targets of a campaign of Nation of Islam intimidation. Malcolm’s habit, after the birth of each of his four children, was to embark on distant speaking tours.
Yet despite this, the man who emerges from this book is in many respects admirable: brave, loyal, self-disciplined, quick-witted, charismatic, acutely intelligent and a public speaker of quite awesome power. A fallacy that has grown over the years is that there were three distinct Malcolms: the street thug, the white-hating demagogue and, after his split with the Nation of Islam, a liberal integrationist who was in essence a slightly more outspoken King.
Regardless of his book’s subtitle, Marable argues that there was a much stronger continuum. Malcolm (whose father was probably murdered by white racists) was the child of supporters of the black nationalist Marcus Garvey. And while he softened his position vis-a-vis white America in his post-Nation of Islam phase, he remained capable of vehement anti-white rhetoric and overwhelmingly concerned with black power.
Given his difficult childhood (he was taken into care and fostered), and the fierce racism that dominated American civil and political life at the time, his attitudes were not surprising. What was out of the ordinary was the unrelenting determination he brought to the business of galvanizing black America. Lacking a formal education, he became a voracious reader and an inspired debater. Marable suggests that Malcolm’s youthful appreciation of jazz helped create a vocal rhythm that propelled his speeches.
While Malcolm correctly predicted that black culture would assume a central role in American life, he would never have foreseen the election of a black president. And as is true of many militants, there was no tyrant, however murderous, that he wouldn’t praise in the name of anti-imperialism. Yet in truth, he outgrew the Nation of Islam strategically and intellectually some years before the final breach, and stayed within the organization, parroting lines for which he felt increasing contempt, out of blind allegiance. Perhaps he knew that to leave was to sign his death warrant.
In the Nation of Islam’s newspaper, a few weeks before Malcolm’s murder, one of the group’s leading ministers declared: “Such a man as Malcolm is worthy of death.” They were the words of Louis X, who had been Malcolm’s most promising disciple. He is now better-known as Louis Farrakhan.
Malcolm’s killing on Feb. 21, 1965 in front of a Harlem audience that included his wife and children has been the subject of much speculation. He was shot by three men, one of whom, a Nation of Islam member, was caught and disarmed by the crowd. The two others — whose identities have long been known — escaped, and two entirely innocent men were found guilty and imprisoned in an appalling miscarriage of justice that, ironically, confirmed Malcolm’s opinion of America’s prejudiced legal system.
Marable presents a strong case that there was some form of FBI collusion in the murder, if only to the degree that the bureau, which had spies all over the Nation of Islam, failed to prevent the plot. He also floats the probability that at least one of the killers was an FBI informant.
Whatever the truth, there is no disputing that Malcolm was shot dead by men who largely shared his beliefs. Nor that 30 years after his murder more than half a million black men would converge on Washington DC to protest, in the language he made popular, the demonization and criminalization of African American males. The keynote speaker at that “million man march” was Louis Farrakhan. Malcolm, no doubt, would have appreciated history’s gift for farce.
Last week, Viola Zhou published a marvelous deep dive into the culture clash between Taiwanese boss mentality and American labor practices at the Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC) plant in Arizona in Rest of World. “The American engineers complained of rigid, counterproductive hierarchies at the company,” while the Taiwanese said American workers aren’t dedicated. The article is a delight, but what it is depicting is the clash between a work culture that offers employee autonomy and at least nods at work-life balance, and one that runs on hierarchical discipline enforced by chickenshit. And it runs on chickenshit because chickenshit is a cultural
My previous column Donovan’s Deep Dives: The powerful political force that vanished from the English press on April 23 began with three paragraphs of what would be to most English-language readers today incomprehensible gibberish, but are very typical descriptions of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) internal politics in the local Chinese-language press. After a quiet period in the early 2010s, the English press stopped writing about the DPP factions, the factions changed and eventually local English-language journalists could not reintroduce the subject without a long explanation on the context that would not fit easily in a typical news article. That previous
April 29 to May 5 One month before the Taipei-Keelung New Road (北基新路) was set to open, the news that US general Douglas MacArthur had died, reached Taiwan. The military leader saw Taiwan as an “unsinkable aircraft carrier” that was of huge strategic value to the US. He’d been a proponent of keeping it out of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) hands. Coupled with the fact that the US had funded more than 50 percent of the road’s construction costs, the authorities at the last minute renamed it the MacArthur Thruway (麥帥公路) for his “great contributions to the free world and deep
Years ago, I was thrilled when I came across a map online showing a fun weekend excursion: a long motorcycle ride into the mountains of Pingtung County (屏東) going almost up to the border with Taitung County (台東), followed by a short hike up to a mountain lake with the mysterious name of “Small Ghost Lake” (小鬼湖). I shared it with a more experienced hiking friend who then proceeded to laugh. Apparently, this road had been taken out by landslides long before and was never going to be fixed. Reaching the lake this way — or any way that would