There were crowd-pleasers at this year’s European Fine Art Fair, like a Rembrandt portrait regally displayed behind a black rope. There were also paintings by Renoir and Picasso, Miro and Warhol. But the main allure of this annual, super-size event was its breadth. Besides the smorgasbord of brand-name paintings there were arcane objects here too, like a 12th-century carved ivory chess piece about the size of a thumbnail, or a two-headed Chinese wood sculpture dating from around the third century BC. There was even a 118-carat diamond with a US$25 million price tag.
Despite recent stock market fluctuations, disasters in Japan and unrest in the Arab world, tens of thousands of art lovers flocked to the soulless convention center housing the fair to see 260 exhibitors from 16 countries show some 30,000 artworks. Fair officials estimated they would see a total of 70,000 visitors by the time the exhibition closed on March 27. That was the same amount as in past years, though the crowds seemed somewhat thinner. But if the number of private planes that landed at the tiny Maastricht airport on the day of the invitation-only preview — 60, up from 43 last year — was any indication, the event still packs in a pretty swell crowd.
Museum directors could be seen perusing the booths, including Mikhail Piotrovsky from the State Hermitage Museum in St Petersburg, Russia; Henri Loyrette from the Louvre in Paris; Wim Pijbes from the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam; and Michael Conforti from the Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute in Williamstown, Massachusetts. Museum curators also made the trip to look at art and see colleagues, including six from the Metropolitan Museum of Art alone. And as always serious collectors came to shop. Among those seen milling around the booths: Sheik Saud al-Thani of Qatar; Stefan Edlis, an industrialist from Chicago; Mark Fisch, a Manhattan real estate developer; Agnes Gund, president emerita of the Museum of Modern Art; and Baroness Marion Lambert, wife of Baron Philippe Lambert, a member of the Belgian banking family.
Photo: Bloomberg
For all the variety of wares it is the fine art that still gets the most attention here, with the pros on hand trying to take the temperature of the market. Getting an accurate reading is tricky, however, since dealers notoriously talk the market up. And unlike at Art Basel, the frenetic contemporary art fair held in Switzerland every June — where collectors typically make a mad dash for the booths, checkbooks in hand — buyers at this fair tend to take their time. Often deals are not completed until the weeks after the event’s end. Still, some significant sales have been reported, including a US$5 million Miro sculpture; a 1671 oil-on-panel view of Haarlem by the Dutch master Gerrit Berckheyde, priced at US$6.3 million; and a 1937 Picasso drawing of Dora Maar marked at US$2.5 million.
“There’s a huge amount of liquidity out there,” said Richard Feigen, the Manhattan dealer. “But with so much turbulence in the world, collectors don’t want to let things go, making it hard to find good material.”
Unlike last year, when there were no blockbuster offerings, this year there were a few. (Though some of the cognoscenti were grumbling that most were a bit too familiar from auctions past.) Otto Naumann, the Manhattan dealer, was offering the fair’s star, Rembrandt’s Portrait of a Man With Arms Akimbo from 1658, which depicts an unidentified sitter staring, confidently, straight at the viewer. The painting, priced at US$47 million, belongs to Stephen Wynn, the Las Vegas casino owner, who paid US$33.2 million for it at Christie’s in London two years ago. “I tried to buy it at the Christie’s sale,” said Naumann, who explained that he persuaded Wynn to sell it after he read about occupancy rates plunging in Las Vegas last year.
Photo: Bloomberg
On an adjacent wall was Portrait of Sigismund Baldinger, by the 16th-century German painter Georg Pencz. Naumann bought it at Christie’s in London in July for US$8.5 million; he was asking US$12 million.
While Naumann’s booth was one of many with work that has been on the market recently, the fair was not without its discoveries. Jack Kilgore, another Manhattan dealer, bought Emperor Commodus as Hercules, a painting on oak panel from 1588-1589, in December at a small European auction, where it was cataloged as only 18th-century Flemish school. Examining the meticulous brushwork, he had a hunch it was by Rubens, who had painted a series of Roman emperors, one of which was missing. Research, including consultations with various scholars, confirmed that this was it. (And the fair’s vetting committee agreed.) A collector then snapped up the painting for US$1.25 million on March 17, but Kilgore declined to identify him. “I could have sold it three times,” he said.
Several years ago the fair began beefing up its modern and contemporary art section, giving other fairs like Art Basel a bit of competition. But this year, although there were 46 modern and contemporary galleries exhibiting, the same number as last year, the selection was noticeably weaker. Gone were many of the big-name dealers like Gagosian, Hauser & Wirth, Annely Juda, L&M Arts and Michael Werner Gallery, all of whom dropped out over the last few years with no heavy hitters to replace them.
Photo: Bloomberg
Still, there were a few standouts. Anthony Meier, the San Francisco dealer, for instance, had a glass case of small sculptures by Robert Gober: a red shoe (US$90,000), a Seagram’s gin bottle (US$110,000) and a wax candle (US$65,000). “There’s a huge collecting community for Gobers in Belgium,” Meier said.
Sperone Westwater, the Manhattan gallery, was showing the work of Barry X Ball, a New York artist known for using three-dimensional computer scans as well as traditional carving techniques, who is having an exhibition at the Ca’ Rezzonico museum in Venice this summer timed to the Biennale.
There did seem to be an appetite for good examples of work by proven contemporary artists. Christophe Van de Weghe, another Manhattan dealer, had red dots beside several paintings, including a 1981 Basquiat for US$2.6 million and a canvas by Christopher Wool for US$1.5 million. Both buyers, he said, were European. “Business is strong as long as the price is right,” Van de Weghe said. “It’s still a sensitive market.”
One of the biggest sore spots in Taiwan’s historical friendship with the US came in 1979 when US president Jimmy Carter broke off formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan’s Republic of China (ROC) government so that the US could establish relations with the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Taiwan’s derecognition came purely at China’s insistence, and the US took the deal. Retired American diplomat John Tkacik, who for almost decade surrounding that schism, from 1974 to 1982, worked in embassies in Taipei and Beijing and at the Taiwan Desk in Washington DC, recently argued in the Taipei Times that “President Carter’s derecognition
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
You can tell a lot about a generation from the contents of their cool box: nowadays the barbecue ice bucket is likely to be filled with hard seltzers, non-alcoholic beers and fluorescent BuzzBallz — a particular favorite among Gen Z. Two decades ago, it was WKD, Bacardi Breezers and the odd Smirnoff Ice bobbing in a puddle of melted ice. And while nostalgia may have brought back some alcopops, the new wave of ready-to-drink (RTD) options look and taste noticeably different. It is not just the drinks that have changed, but drinking habits too, driven in part by more health-conscious consumers and
RSS