Researchers should revisit “basic science” in the ongoing search for an HIV vaccine, says Francoise Barre-Sinoussi, who
shared the Nobel Prize in Medicine or Physiology in 2008 for codiscovering HIV and its role in causing AIDS.
The French virologist and public health activist was in Taipei last week to deliver a lecture at Academia Sinica, after which she spoke at a press meeting attended by the Taipei Times about the scientific and social challenges caused by HIV and AIDS.
Photo: Bloomberg
Since Barre-Sinoussi, along with her colleague and Nobel corecipient Luc Montagnier, first identified HIV in 1983, a working vaccine for the retrovirus has proven elusive.
One of the more promising vaccines in recent years was declared a failure in 2007.
For Barre-Sinoussi, one example of going back to “basic science” in HIV research would be to take a step back from clinical trials and examine vaccines that are successfully prevent other diseases.
Photo: David Chen, Taipei Times
This is an area worthy of exploration, said Barre-Sinoussi, as few scientists have “been interested in trying to find the real mechanism of induction of protecting the immune response.”
“It’s a very simple question: how [do] vaccines that are working work? And some [researchers in the US], for example, are interested in studying the yellow fever vaccine, a vaccine that works perfectly well. They’re trying to understand from the beginning how the vaccine works,” she said.
Asked whether she felt frustrated about the lack of an HIV vaccine, Barre-Sinoussi replied: “I was particularly frustrated when we did not have any treatment. But today ... we have highly active the anti-retroviral therapy [also known as HAART, the current multi-drug treatment method for HIV patients]. We don’t have a cure, but we have a treatment. And people on the treatment are living with HIV.”
“We don’t speak anymore about AIDS,” she said. “We are speaking about chronic HIV infection and HAART. I feel much better.”
A cure, if it’s defined as “ total eradication of the virus from the body,” for HIV may never be found, said Barre-Sinoussi.
However, she says there is hope for a “functional cure,” one that would control the immune defenses of someone infected with HIV, and prevent the virus being transmitted.
Barre-Sinoussi says she believes such a cure is possible because there are cases of HIV-positive people who show no symptoms and have very low levels of the virus in their blood.
“It exists in a few people we call controllers, natural controllers,” said Barre-Sinoussi. “They are not treated. They are infected for more than 10 years, some of them 15 years. They have never received any anti-retroviral treatment, they do not have any detectable viruses in their blood ... but they are [HIV] positive, and of course by very sensitive techniques we can detect the virus.”
If such a defense exists naturally, “we should be able to induce it,” she said.
Barre-Sinoussi, 63, is also known for her work outside of the lab. She has worked all over the world, particularly in developing nations, and helped establish HIV monitoring and treatment networks in the Central African Republic, Cameroon, Vietnam and Cambodia.
She is a vocal advocate of education and prevention programs that combine risk-reduction measures, such as anti-retroviral treatments, widespread HIV testing, circumcision — which according to Barre-Sinoussi reduces the risk of infection by 50 percent — and the use of condoms.
Barre-Sinoussi said that condoms are one of the “best vaccines” available, a position that has placed her at odds with religious leaders.
Last year, she wrote a public letter of protest to Pope Benedict XVI over controversial remarks he made on a visit to several African nations.
“[The Pope] said that condoms were not efficient, on his way to Cameroon, a country with around 12 percent [of the population suffering from] HIV infection. This is not acceptable. This is even criminal,” she said. “So all the work done [over] many years — only a few minutes
of such a ridiculous statement — is changing totally the situation in one country.”
Barre-Sinoussi, one of the relatively few women to have received a Nobel (40 women have won a Nobel as of last year, compared to 762 men), also spoke about women in science.
She describes the current situation where she works at the Pasteur Institute in Paris as a “positive evolution.”
“Twenty-five years ago ... there were only very few female researchers, as professors of the Pasteur Institute,” she said. “Today, I don’t have the exact number in my head, but I don’t think we are far from 50-50, now it’s maybe 40-60, something like that. Even the president of the Pasteur Institute today is a woman.”
She recalled once being told by a male researcher to change her career strategy because a “woman has never done anything in research.”
“I thought of the same thing when my father said, ‘Are you sure you want to study at the university?’ You’d better think of getting married and having children.’ [With the male researcher], I had the same thought in my head: ‘I’m going to show you what a woman is capable of doing.’”
Barre-Sinoussi says another urgent problem with HIV lies in providing “immediate access to treatment” in poorer countries, and the solution is partly political.
She said that the G20 countries in particular need to live up to their commitments as donors to the UN’s Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, and rich countries in general need to give even more money, with dire consequences looming if they do not.
“They have to realize if they don’t do it, it will be a catastrophe. At the global level,” she said. “If we cannot continue to treat the patients that are already on treatment, they will develop resistance to anti-retroviral treatment. And the strains of viruses that are resistant to anti-retroviral treatment will circulate, everywhere in the world. What are we going to do? So we will have a reemerging HIV epidemic. They will be responsible for that situation. They will be responsible for the deaths of people, everywhere in the world.”
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
The following three paragraphs are just some of what the local Chinese-language press is reporting on breathlessly and following every twist and turn with the eagerness of a soap opera fan. For many English-language readers, it probably comes across as incomprehensibly opaque, so bear with me briefly dear reader: To the surprise of many, former pop singer and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) ex-lawmaker Yu Tien (余天) of the Taiwan Normal Country Promotion Association (TNCPA) at the last minute dropped out of the running for committee chair of the DPP’s New Taipei City chapter, paving the way for DPP legislator Su
It’s hard to know where to begin with Mark Tovell’s Taiwan: Roads Above the Clouds. Having published a travelogue myself, as well as having contributed to several guidebooks, at first glance Tovell’s book appears to inhabit a middle ground — the kind of hard-to-sell nowheresville publishers detest. Leaf through the pages and you’ll find them suffuse with the purple prose best associated with travel literature: “When the sun is low on a warm, clear morning, and with the heat already rising, we stand at the riverside bike path leading south from Sanxia’s old cobble streets.” Hardly the stuff of your
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist