Researchers should revisit “basic science” in the ongoing search for an HIV vaccine, says Francoise Barre-Sinoussi, who
shared the Nobel Prize in Medicine or Physiology in 2008 for codiscovering HIV and its role in causing AIDS.
The French virologist and public health activist was in Taipei last week to deliver a lecture at Academia Sinica, after which she spoke at a press meeting attended by the Taipei Times about the scientific and social challenges caused by HIV and AIDS.
Photo: Bloomberg
Since Barre-Sinoussi, along with her colleague and Nobel corecipient Luc Montagnier, first identified HIV in 1983, a working vaccine for the retrovirus has proven elusive.
One of the more promising vaccines in recent years was declared a failure in 2007.
For Barre-Sinoussi, one example of going back to “basic science” in HIV research would be to take a step back from clinical trials and examine vaccines that are successfully prevent other diseases.
Photo: David Chen, Taipei Times
This is an area worthy of exploration, said Barre-Sinoussi, as few scientists have “been interested in trying to find the real mechanism of induction of protecting the immune response.”
“It’s a very simple question: how [do] vaccines that are working work? And some [researchers in the US], for example, are interested in studying the yellow fever vaccine, a vaccine that works perfectly well. They’re trying to understand from the beginning how the vaccine works,” she said.
Asked whether she felt frustrated about the lack of an HIV vaccine, Barre-Sinoussi replied: “I was particularly frustrated when we did not have any treatment. But today ... we have highly active the anti-retroviral therapy [also known as HAART, the current multi-drug treatment method for HIV patients]. We don’t have a cure, but we have a treatment. And people on the treatment are living with HIV.”
“We don’t speak anymore about AIDS,” she said. “We are speaking about chronic HIV infection and HAART. I feel much better.”
A cure, if it’s defined as “ total eradication of the virus from the body,” for HIV may never be found, said Barre-Sinoussi.
However, she says there is hope for a “functional cure,” one that would control the immune defenses of someone infected with HIV, and prevent the virus being transmitted.
Barre-Sinoussi says she believes such a cure is possible because there are cases of HIV-positive people who show no symptoms and have very low levels of the virus in their blood.
“It exists in a few people we call controllers, natural controllers,” said Barre-Sinoussi. “They are not treated. They are infected for more than 10 years, some of them 15 years. They have never received any anti-retroviral treatment, they do not have any detectable viruses in their blood ... but they are [HIV] positive, and of course by very sensitive techniques we can detect the virus.”
If such a defense exists naturally, “we should be able to induce it,” she said.
Barre-Sinoussi, 63, is also known for her work outside of the lab. She has worked all over the world, particularly in developing nations, and helped establish HIV monitoring and treatment networks in the Central African Republic, Cameroon, Vietnam and Cambodia.
She is a vocal advocate of education and prevention programs that combine risk-reduction measures, such as anti-retroviral treatments, widespread HIV testing, circumcision — which according to Barre-Sinoussi reduces the risk of infection by 50 percent — and the use of condoms.
Barre-Sinoussi said that condoms are one of the “best vaccines” available, a position that has placed her at odds with religious leaders.
Last year, she wrote a public letter of protest to Pope Benedict XVI over controversial remarks he made on a visit to several African nations.
“[The Pope] said that condoms were not efficient, on his way to Cameroon, a country with around 12 percent [of the population suffering from] HIV infection. This is not acceptable. This is even criminal,” she said. “So all the work done [over] many years — only a few minutes
of such a ridiculous statement — is changing totally the situation in one country.”
Barre-Sinoussi, one of the relatively few women to have received a Nobel (40 women have won a Nobel as of last year, compared to 762 men), also spoke about women in science.
She describes the current situation where she works at the Pasteur Institute in Paris as a “positive evolution.”
“Twenty-five years ago ... there were only very few female researchers, as professors of the Pasteur Institute,” she said. “Today, I don’t have the exact number in my head, but I don’t think we are far from 50-50, now it’s maybe 40-60, something like that. Even the president of the Pasteur Institute today is a woman.”
She recalled once being told by a male researcher to change her career strategy because a “woman has never done anything in research.”
“I thought of the same thing when my father said, ‘Are you sure you want to study at the university?’ You’d better think of getting married and having children.’ [With the male researcher], I had the same thought in my head: ‘I’m going to show you what a woman is capable of doing.’”
Barre-Sinoussi says another urgent problem with HIV lies in providing “immediate access to treatment” in poorer countries, and the solution is partly political.
She said that the G20 countries in particular need to live up to their commitments as donors to the UN’s Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, and rich countries in general need to give even more money, with dire consequences looming if they do not.
“They have to realize if they don’t do it, it will be a catastrophe. At the global level,” she said. “If we cannot continue to treat the patients that are already on treatment, they will develop resistance to anti-retroviral treatment. And the strains of viruses that are resistant to anti-retroviral treatment will circulate, everywhere in the world. What are we going to do? So we will have a reemerging HIV epidemic. They will be responsible for that situation. They will be responsible for the deaths of people, everywhere in the world.”
In the mainstream view, the Philippines should be worried that a conflict over Taiwan between the superpowers will drag in Manila. President Ferdinand Marcos Jr observed in an interview in The Wall Street Journal last year, “I learned an African saying: When elephants fight, the only one that loses is the grass. We are the grass in this situation. We don’t want to get trampled.” Such sentiments are widespread. Few seem to have imagined the opposite: that a gray zone incursion of People’s Republic of China (PRC) ships into the Philippines’ waters could trigger a conflict that drags in Taiwan. Fewer
March 18 to March 24 Yasushi Noro knew that it was not the right time to scale Hehuan Mountain (合歡). It was March 1913 and the weather was still bitingly cold at high altitudes. But he knew he couldn’t afford to wait, either. Launched in 1910, the Japanese colonial government’s “five year plan to govern the savages” was going well. After numerous bloody battles, they had subdued almost all of the indigenous peoples in northeastern Taiwan, save for the Truku who held strong to their territory around the Liwu River (立霧溪) and Mugua River (木瓜溪) basins in today’s Hualien County (花蓮). The Japanese
Pei-Ru Ko (柯沛如) says her Taipei upbringing was a little different from her peers. “We lived near the National Palace Museum [north of Taipei] and our neighbors had rice paddies. They were growing food right next to us. There was a mountain and a river so people would say, ‘you live in the mountains,’ and my friends wouldn’t want to come and visit.” While her school friends remained a bus ride away, Ko’s semi-rural upbringing schooled her in other things, including where food comes from. “Most people living in Taipei wouldn’t have a neighbor that was growing food,” she says. “So
Whether you’re interested in the history of ceramics, the production process itself, creating your own pottery, shopping for ceramic vessels, or simply admiring beautiful handmade items, the Zhunan Snake Kiln (竹南蛇窯) in Jhunan Township (竹南), Miaoli County, is definitely worth a visit. For centuries, kiln products were an integral part of daily life in Taiwan: bricks for walls, tiles for roofs, pottery for the kitchen, jugs for fermenting alcoholic drinks, as well as decorative elements on temples, all came from kilns, and Miaoli was a major hub for the production of these items. The Zhunan Snake Kiln has a large area dedicated