The 12th Taipei Arts Festival (第十二屆台北藝術節) began yesterday with Hey Girl!, a visually stunning performance by Romeo Castellucci. The avant-garde play and its celebrated Italian director embody the direction in which the festival has been headed since the Taipei Culture Foundation (台北市文化基金會) took control of it three years ago.
“We want people to see that [the Taipei Arts Festival] is doing some serious art instead of community art,” said Victoria Wang (王文儀), executive director of the Taipei Culture Foundation. “This [means] giving audiences a new format, new techniques and new styles to show where contemporary theater is going.”
In 2008, the first year of the festival’s reorganization, the Taipei Culture Foundation spent a wad of cash on bringing Robert Wilson to Taiwan, which significantly increased the festival’s profile, said Wang. Last year’s theme, Shakespeare, relied on the Bard’s good name to present a number of avant-garde pieces. It proved a successful pairing with many shows selling out soon after tickets went on sale.
This year’s festival features unconventional theater by some of the world’s top practitioners and more mainstream theatrical performances and musicals by local troupes.
But are Taipei audiences ready to pay big bucks for what is generally considered experimental theater? As of Wednesday, only Waiting for What? (等待窩窩頭之團團圓圓越獄風雲), a play by Four Chairs Theater (四把椅子劇團) about pandas Yuan Yuan (圓圓) and Tuan Tuan (團團) plotting to escape from the Taipei Zoo, had sold out.
Wang lamented the difficulty the festival had in promoting some of the more demanding of its top-billed performances. “In Taiwan, audiences tend to want all the answers ... They want to know exactly what [an artist] is trying to [say],” she said. “So it’s more like an educational kind of experience for them — not an artistic or relaxing or even entertaining kind of experience.” This is unfortunate, because this year’s lineup features the work of directors who rarely, if ever, come to Taiwan.
But perhaps it’s understandable, as many of the performances require the viewer’s complete attention. Hey Girl!, with its sparse dialogue and emphasis on multimedia visuals, is a difficult work to penetrate. One must get inside the body and mind of the play’s protagonist, a young woman coming to terms with her own life experiences, to fully appreciate its themes of violence and the oppression of women. Yet if reviews are anything to go by, it is more than worth the effort. The Guardian called Castellucci “a towering visual genius” who created a “mesmerizing show.”
Even more unconventional, perhaps, is Stifters Dinge, a genre-bending piece that opens on Wednesday by internationally celebrated German director and composer Heiner Goebbels. Equal parts music, theater and art installation, it is described in the festival catalogue as “a composition for five pianos with no pianists, a play with no actors, a performance without performers — one might say a no-man show.” Wang said it was chosen because it illustrates the endless possibilities that contemporary theater professionals are bringing to the stage.
While some plays might stretch the limits of the viewer’s understanding, others may test their ability to concentrate. Lipsynch by Robert Lepage, the French-Canadian pioneer of mixed-media theater, is an almost nine-hour “marathon” performance (including four short intermissions and a 45-minute dinner break). It begins on Aug. 21 and tells the story of an orphaned boy who is adopted by an opera singer, and playfully touches on the heavy themes of family, language and identity.
But Taipei Arts Festival is not just about unconventional theater. It also offers a lineup of more conventional fare that revolves around this year’s theme of “mystery and affection.” Shakespeare’s Wild Sisters Group (莎士比亞的妹妹們的劇團) revives its 2005 musical Michael Jackson, a hagiography about the life of this troubled star. Thriller, Bad and Dangerous are among the numbers that will be performed.
Mint, Rosemary and the Flower With No Name (薄荷、迷迭香和不知名的花) by Slow Island Theater (慢島劇團) offers the troupe’s take on the enigma of intimacy with a love story between two women. All Music Theater (音樂時代劇場) broadens the festival’s theme with The Impossible Times (渭水春風), a story that examines issues of national identity through the life of Chiang Wei-shui (蔣渭水), a formative figure in Taiwan’s colonial resistance movement — a subject that is certain to resonate because his legacy remains the stuff of considerable debate in all sides of Taiwan’s political spectrum.
There is much more on offer for this year’s festival. In addition to pre-performance talks and after-performance discussions, which provide context and insight into the creation and staging of these productions, there is also a film screening, lectures and a public art installation. English-language subtitles will be used on the opening night of the Taiwanese performances.
“Our job is to give the audience the best theatrical experiences they’ve ever had in Taipei,” said Wang. “And this year, we intentionally emphasized avant-garde work for audiences because coming to the third year, our audience should be ready for a greater challenge,” she said.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50