Three years after a Vienna museum had to restore five Klimt paintings stolen by the Nazis to their Jewish owners, the city’s art museum fears the same fate for a piece by Vermeer.
Austria’s culture ministry revealed at the weekend that it had received a request for the restitution of The Art of Painting by 17th-century Flemish artist Johannes Vermeer, which has been on display at the Kunsthistorisches Museum since 1946.
The painting was bought in 1940 by Adolf Hitler for his planned museum in the northern Austrian city of Linz.
It would be a “painful loss,” Kunst-historisches Museum director Sabine Haag said of a potential restitution.
“It’s an absolute jewel,” she added about the painting, noting that it was still too early to even consider giving it back.
Under a 1998 restitution law, Austria has already returned to their rightful owners some 10,000 artworks stolen by the Nazis after they annexed Austria in 1938.
In the latest case in April, the city of Linz returned a painting by Viennese master Gustav Klimt to the Jewish family that was robbed of it under the Third Reich.
In 2006, Vienna’s Belvedere Museum had to restore five major paintings by the artist to the descendants of the previous owner.
The Vermeer piece however is more debatable, according to experts.
The painting, which had belonged to the Czernin family since the 19th century, was officially sold to Hitler in 1940 by Jaromir Czernin for 1.65 million Reichsmark.
Requests to have it returned to the family in the 1960s were rejected on the grounds that the sale had been voluntary and the price had been adequate.
But a new report commissioned by the family has concluded that the sale was made under duress.
“[Jaromir] Czernin had no choice: he had to sell in order to guarantee
his family’s safety,” the family’s
lawyer Andreas Theiss told Der
Standard newspaper.
The brother-in-law of chancellor Kurt von Schuschnigg, who ruled Austria with an iron fist from 1934 to 1938 and attempted to oppose Hitler’s annexation of his country, Czernin was also married to a woman of Jewish descent.
However, Eva Blimlinger, scientific head of the Austrian commission studying the origins of artworks, concluded after examining the new expert’s report that it contained “no new documents” from 40 years ago, according to Der Standard.
Opposition Green deputy Wolfgang Zinggl, who has pushed for the restitution of artworks in Austria, meanwhile said: “This case threatens to overshadow others that are more obvious and have already been delayed too long.”
The Israeli community, for instance, has long considered stolen over a dozen works at Vienna’s Leopold Museum, including seven by Austrian artist Egon Schiele.
But unlike most of the country’s art museums, the Leopold is a private institution and as such not subject to the 1998 law.
“As far as public collections are concerned however, museums follow the commission’s recommendations quickly and without challenging them,” said Zinggl.
The commission, whose recommendations are always followed by the ministry, systematically examines the origin of each piece that has entered public collections since the Third Reich.
Given that less than 40 paintings
by Vermeer exist in the world, The
Art of Painting could easily fetch a similar price.
In 2004, a small Vermeer was
sold by auction house Sotheby’s for US$180 million.
Behind a car repair business on a nondescript Thai street are the cherished pets of a rising TikTok animal influencer: two lions and a 200-kilogram lion-tiger hybrid called “Big George.” Lion ownership is legal in Thailand, and Tharnuwarht Plengkemratch is an enthusiastic advocate, posting updates on his feline companions to nearly three million followers. “They’re playful and affectionate, just like dogs or cats,” he said from inside their cage complex at his home in the northern city of Chiang Mai. Thailand’s captive lion population has exploded in recent years, with nearly 500 registered in zoos, breeding farms, petting cafes and homes. Experts warn the
The unexpected collapse of the recall campaigns is being viewed through many lenses, most of them skewed and self-absorbed. The international media unsurprisingly focuses on what they perceive as the message that Taiwanese voters were sending in the failure of the mass recall, especially to China, the US and to friendly Western nations. This made some sense prior to early last month. One of the main arguments used by recall campaigners for recalling Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers was that they were too pro-China, and by extension not to be trusted with defending the nation. Also by extension, that argument could be
Aug. 4 to Aug. 10 When Coca-Cola finally pushed its way into Taiwan’s market in 1968, it allegedly vowed to wipe out its major domestic rival Hey Song within five years. But Hey Song, which began as a manual operation in a family cow shed in 1925, had proven its resilience, surviving numerous setbacks — including the loss of autonomy and nearly all its assets due to the Japanese colonial government’s wartime economic policy. By the 1960s, Hey Song had risen to the top of Taiwan’s beverage industry. This success was driven not only by president Chang Wen-chi’s
Last week, on the heels of the recall election that turned out so badly for Taiwan, came the news that US President Donald Trump had blocked the transit of President William Lai (賴清德) through the US on his way to Latin America. A few days later the international media reported that in June a scheduled visit by Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) for high level meetings was canceled by the US after China’s President Xi Jinping (習近平) asked Trump to curb US engagement with Taiwan during a June phone call. The cancellation of Lai’s transit was a gaudy