Interest in history is on the rise in books, films and television. Is that necessarily a good thing?
The Balkans, Winston Churchill wrote, had more history than they could consume. Too much history can even become “the gravedigger of the present,” sapping our vital energies with memories of past wounds and losses, as Friedrich Nietzsche said in On the Use and Abuse of History for Life.
Margaret MacMillan borrows Nietzsche’s title, but not his message in her new book, The Uses and Abuses of History. For her, understanding the past is vital, even if history is an explosive substance that needs to be handled with care.
A prize-winning historian and the warden of St Antony’s College at the University of Oxford, MacMillan is good on the perpetuation of historical myth. A case in point is the oft-repeated contention, boosted by economist John Maynard Keynes, that the victors’ vindictive treatment of Germany after World War I inevitably led to World War II.
Yet the Germans did, after all, lose the war, and their punishment in practice was never as harsh as critics persist in suggesting, MacMillan reminds us: Germany paid only a fraction of the reparations bill; Adolf Hitler canceled what was left; and in any case it was the Great Depression that really put the screws on the country, sharpening its aggressive mood.
Facing up to uncomfortable historical truths can be painful, as MacMillan notes. Britain’s mismanagement of the Irish question and Rhodesia are good examples, as is Germany’s embrace of the Nazis.
Yet it’s immature to see our past as little more than an accumulation of guilt, she argues. Everything comes down to a balanced view of history, something Russia’s leaders are now upsetting as they seek, little by little, to refurbish Josef Stalin’s reputation, she says.
A similar perversion of history can be seen in Japan, where many a textbook continues to shy away from presenting a true account of the atrocities Japanese troops committed in China in the 1930s and during World War II.
Nationalism is one of history’s greatest enemies, MacMillan argues. The Chinese, she says, would be surprised to learn that Hindu extremists claim to have rediscovered an advanced Indian civilization that preceded China’s. By this account, the Chinese are little more than descendants of Hindu warriors. Equally surprised by this theory would be the followers of Marcus Garvey, who claimed in the 1920s that a black civilization once ruled the world.
The danger of knowing too much history is of course outweighed by the risk of knowing too little. Americans, according to MacMillan, failed to understand the historically formed mentality of their Cold War opponents, Russia and China (not that it stopped them winning, except in Vietnam). Ignorance of Iraq’s culture was a major factor in some of the catastrophic consequences of the US-led invasion of that country, and MacMillan devotes many pages to a familiar critique of former US president George W. Bush and all his works.
Given this emphasis on the past’s lessons for the present, it’s surprising that MacMillan doesn’t discuss the history behind the rise of terrorism. She rightly accuses some countries of developing grievance cultures, and she chides the Chinese, the Latin Americans and the French Canadians (MacMillan is Canadian) for blaming colonialism for all their woes.
“It is all too easy to rummage through the past and find nothing but a list of grievances,” she writes.
Strangely, MacMillan spares Muslim cultures from this criticism and even comes close to justifying their long- festering resentments.
“The Crusades, the defeat of the Moors in Spain, Western imperialism in the 19th century and the evils of the 20th all add up to a dark tale of Muslim humiliation and suffering,” she writes. “Such history keeps followers angry and motivates and attracts new recruits.”
No suggestion here that these cultures carry any responsibility for their own destinies. But what of their oppression of women and attacks on modernity?
Almost every major country and civilization gets whacked in these pages for its misdemeanors. Yet Iran, an ancient, grievance-ridden culture par excellence now led by a semi-crazed president, escapes censure. As for Pakistan — a clear and present danger to the world if ever there was one — it isn’t even mentioned. Surely its tragic history was worth a word.
No one will dissent from MacMillan’s view that history must be prudently handled, but prudence must not mean inconsistency or evasion.
The book is published in the US under the title ‘Dangerous Games.’
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
The following three paragraphs are just some of what the local Chinese-language press is reporting on breathlessly and following every twist and turn with the eagerness of a soap opera fan. For many English-language readers, it probably comes across as incomprehensibly opaque, so bear with me briefly dear reader: To the surprise of many, former pop singer and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) ex-lawmaker Yu Tien (余天) of the Taiwan Normal Country Promotion Association (TNCPA) at the last minute dropped out of the running for committee chair of the DPP’s New Taipei City chapter, paving the way for DPP legislator Su
It’s hard to know where to begin with Mark Tovell’s Taiwan: Roads Above the Clouds. Having published a travelogue myself, as well as having contributed to several guidebooks, at first glance Tovell’s book appears to inhabit a middle ground — the kind of hard-to-sell nowheresville publishers detest. Leaf through the pages and you’ll find them suffuse with the purple prose best associated with travel literature: “When the sun is low on a warm, clear morning, and with the heat already rising, we stand at the riverside bike path leading south from Sanxia’s old cobble streets.” Hardly the stuff of your
Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception. Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen. “In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby