South Africa’s president rarely misses an opportunity to entertain supporters with a rousing, hip-swinging rendition of the
anti-apartheid song Bring Me My Machine Gun.
Not to be outdone, Jacob Zuma’s rivals have come up with catchy tune of their own. They’ve taken to singing that their party “has no machine guns.” It also doesn’t have any “showers,” they chant, dangling their fingers over their heads to suggest running water.
They’re ridiculing Zuma, who in 2006 said he showered after having unprotected sex with an HIV-positive woman because he believed it would reduce the risk of being infected with the AIDS virus.
South Africa’s political scene has long been a raucous, musical affair but the tempo’s been stepped up a beat with this month’s elections.
Old freedom songs that evoke the struggle against apartheid have been revived and newer ones have been composed to reflect the political battles of the day. The anti-Zuma song sprung up among members of a party that broke away from Zuma’s African National Congress last year.
“People are so creative,” said Sipho Jantjie, who was among those voicing their support for the new breakaway Congress of the People (COPE) party at a recent rally in Soweto. “They are composing songs all the time.”
Songs long have been a powerful weapon of resistance in South Africa. During apartheid when leaders were jailed and their voices silenced, songs became a rallying cry.
They were sung at trials and on the way to the gallows. At mass funerals, thousands hummed mournful hymns as coffins were lowered into the ground. From across the borders came songs of exile and armed struggle.
But as South Africa’s past grows more distant, there was a fear that the songs were fading into the background.
Zuma put the song and dance back into local politics with Umshini Wami, or Bring Me My Machine Gun — his call for that worldwide symbol of revolution — the AK47.
The stirring Zulu song with its strong, soulful rhythm has become a national hit. It is heard in taxis, taverns and is sung by church choirs. It is even available as a cellphone ringtone.
Villagers in the Zulu heartland sang it outside the school where Zuma voted on April 22 and the song rang out at an ANC victory party in downtown Johannesburg a few days later.
Still, critics say in a country with South Africa’s violent past and where at least 50 people a day are murdered, the song is divisive and inciting.
Strains of the song could be heard during the bloody anti-immigrant riots that swept South Africa last year.
“The song recalls an earlier and more dangerous way of being,” says Liz Gunner, research associate at the Wits Institute for Social and Economic Research.
In a paper published last year, Gunner traces the “life” of the song and its role in Zuma’s rise to prominence.
The song has its roots among the ANC military training camps where frustrated guerrillas wished for weapons so they could return to fight apartheid. It was also sung by the students in the famous Soweto 1976 uprising, which drew world attention to the apartheid regime’s violence and injected new life into the struggle to topple it.
The brutality of the police response to the unarmed students sparked nationwide rioting in which more than 500 youths are estimated to have been killed. Thousands of others were maimed, disappeared into detention or fled the country to join the guerrilla fight.
Like many “freedom songs,” the authorship of Bring Me My Machine Gun is not clear and it has been adapted over the years.
Today it has become the anthem of the poor who favor Zuma over his predecessor, Thabo Mbeki — who preferred quoting Yeats to singing and dancing.
Zuma began singing the song about five years ago amid claims by him and his supporters that criminal charges against him were part of a conspiracy by Mbeki to thwart his ambitions.
The claims and a bitter power struggle between Zuma and Mbeki for leadership of the party left many South Africans nervous about the future of their new democracy. Mbeki was eventually ousted by the ANC as president last year and Zuma was inaugurated on Saturday.
Coming at a time of “national confusion and anxiety,’” Zuma’s choice of song was “superbly timed,” Gunner writes.
“The icon of the heroic guerrilla fighter was melded with that of the beleaguered senior politician,’’ she says in her paper.
But Zuma rivals are determined not to have their voices drowned out by his deep baritone.
Sung in Sotho, one of the most widely spoken languages in the country, the “shower song” first captured attention at the breakaway party’s launch in December last year. And it has caught on fast.
At COPE’s Soweto rally in February, a crowd of a few thousand sang the easy melody, repeatedly, each time with more gusto.
“Today we are reviving the spirit you used to get in 1976,” said Lloyd Phillips. “We are reviving the spirit of the songs.’’
May 26 to June 1 When the Qing Dynasty first took control over many parts of Taiwan in 1684, it roughly continued the Kingdom of Tungning’s administrative borders (see below), setting up one prefecture and three counties. The actual area of control covered today’s Chiayi, Tainan and Kaohsiung. The administrative center was in Taiwan Prefecture, in today’s Tainan. But as Han settlement expanded and due to rebellions and other international incidents, the administrative units became more complex. By the time Taiwan became a province of the Qing in 1887, there were three prefectures, eleven counties, three subprefectures and one directly-administered prefecture, with
Taiwan Power Co (Taipower, 台電) and the New Taipei City Government in May last year agreed to allow the activation of a spent fuel storage facility for the Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant in Shihmen District (石門). The deal ended eleven years of legal wrangling. According to the Taipower announcement, the city government engaged in repeated delays, failing to approve water and soil conservation plans. Taipower said at the time that plans for another dry storage facility for the Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Wanli District (萬里) remained stuck in legal limbo. Later that year an agreement was reached
What does the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) in the Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) era stand for? What sets it apart from their allies, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)? With some shifts in tone and emphasis, the KMT’s stances have not changed significantly since the late 2000s and the era of former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). The Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) current platform formed in the mid-2010s under the guidance of Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), and current President William Lai (賴清德) campaigned on continuity. Though their ideological stances may be a bit stale, they have the advantage of being broadly understood by the voters.
In a high-rise office building in Taipei’s government district, the primary agency for maintaining links to Thailand’s 108 Yunnan villages — which are home to a population of around 200,000 descendants of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) armies stranded in Thailand following the Chinese Civil War — is the Overseas Community Affairs Council (OCAC). Established in China in 1926, the OCAC was born of a mandate to support Chinese education, culture and economic development in far flung Chinese diaspora communities, which, especially in southeast Asia, had underwritten the military insurgencies against the Qing Dynasty that led to the founding of
RSS