The premise of this book could be the definition of what I generally look to avoid in a novel: a semi-autobiographical travelogue in which the protagonist, a British journalist approaching middle age, lives the high life at the Venice Biennale and then goes off to “find himself” in India. It seemed horribly certain to involve smugness and midlife crisis-related oversharing. Neither did the title, with its naff pun, bode well. Remarkably, from this material Geoff Dyer has fashioned a novel that is both funny and insightful.
Dyer, who is 50, has tackled a diverse range of subjects in his 10 previous books, ranging from the missing of the Somme to the pleasures of drug-taking, but the central preoccupation of his work is usually himself. Jeff in Venice, Death in Varanasi is no exception. The novel is divided into two sections, the first telling the story of a Dyer alter-ego, Jeff Atman, a recently divorced hack sent to Venice to cover the Biennale for Kulchur magazine. Obviously, the art shows are merely the fringe entertainment on this trip; a pleasant means of passing the time while recovering from the previous night’s bellini-induced hangover. Jeff is further distracted from his ostensible purpose by the beautiful Laura, an American gallerist.
Much to his amazement, she is undeterred by his age and skinniness, and together they embark on a three-day sex and booze and drug-fuelled bender. At a party aboard a millionaire’s yacht, blasted on coke and with this gorgeous creature on his arm, Jeff experiences a joyous epiphany: “The last six or however many hours it was were like a concentrated version of everything he had ever wanted from his life.”
That feeling is an illusion, both real and unreal, like much of the art on show and like Venice itself. As befits a novel about two watery cities, this book is filled with shimmering apparitions that never quite resolve themselves. The morning after the party, Jeff and Laura go and sit in a light installation by James Turrell: “It was an illusion, but because it was an illusion this did not mean it was less real than anything else, than things which were not illusory.”
Jeff’s story, which could have been mundane, is rescued by this mystical quality and by Dyer’s very funny — and accurate — portrait of the contemporary art world in all its ridiculousness. After several nights on the lash, a colleague of Jeff’s proposes a toast to the only artist worth remembering from the Biennale: Bellini. This is greeted by a great — and by no means entirely ironic — cheer.
While the art world is neatly skewered, however, it is not dismissed. Jeff’s responses to the work he sees are acute and deeply felt. Dyer, or, rather, Jeff (Dyer makes a point of distancing himself from Jeff’s critical opinions in an end note), manages to find meaning in contemporary art without falling into the emperor’s new clothes trap: “The work may have been puerile, but the hunger to succeed of which it was the product and symbol was ravenous. In different historical circumstances, any number of these artists could have seized control of the Reichstag or ruled Cambodia with unprecedented ruthlessness.”
Unfortunately, Dyer’s control evaporates as soon as Laura’s kit comes off. In order to enjoy a sex scene, one needs to feel at some level attracted to the characters involved, and as much as Jeff is funny and likable, he was not someone I wanted to picture at it in quite the forensic level of detail provided.
The second section, Death in Varanasi, is a rippled and distorted reflection of the first. Again, a writer gets sent off on an assignment, this time to do a travel piece on the sacred Indian city where the dead are cremated by the Ganges. This protagonist is very similar to Jeff, but now he narrates in the first person. We keep expecting the two stories to converge — Laura talks in the first section about traveling to Varanasi — but although they come within touching distance of one another, they remain discrete.
Certain details reappear, like objects floating to the surface of a river: a dog chewing its tail, a bunch of bananas. In Venice, Jeff dreams he is a corpse being chewed on by a dog; we stumble upon this corpse again in Varanasi. Laura’s reflection is Laline, a beautiful fellow traveler who bestows her love not on the narrator but on his charismatic friend, Darrell.
In Varanasi, the material pleasures that came so easily in Venice remain out of reach and lose their significance. While Jeff is driven by his desires, tormented by the itch of his ambition, Jeff/Geoff gradually sloughs off such concerns and delivers himself to the spirit of his own imaginary god, Ganoona, “all that which is not anything else. But it’s also that which is everything else.”
Both experiences are responses to the same existential problem: a life that has been built upon foundations as faulty as Venice’s, an unfulfilling job, a failed relationship. The coke, the sex, the bellinis deliver little more than a thudding hangover, while Ganoona leads towards something akin to madness. There are no glib self-help solutions here, but there is an amusing and intelligent exploration of some of life’s big questions.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50