In M.C. Escher’s 1956 lithograph The Print Gallery, represented space is made to curve so that what seems to be an exhibit hanging on the wall turns out, as the eye travels over the picture, to contain the entire gallery. In visual art, an effect of this sort is easily categorized as an optical illusion — but then the representation of three dimensions in two is an illusion by definition — or impossible object. It gives pleasure or irritation, but it doesn’t call the whole artistic enterprise into question.
Things are different when similar effects are carried over into fiction, as they are in Amos Oz’s Rhyming Life and Death. An Israeli writer known only as the Author attends a cultural evening at which his work is analyzed, read aloud and discussed. He imagines lives for some of the people in the audience, and those who share the podium with him, giving them names and histories. Scenes between the Author and these figments are played out with variations, are reworked or erased, rather as happened with the Gielgud character in Alain Resnais’ 1977 movie Providence.
The destabilization is more drastic than Escher’s and suddenly there is need for a technical term: postmodernism. The reason for the difference must be the element of time and the fact that readers don’t just contemplate that illusory third dimension but inhabit it continuously. The book is on the beguiling end of the scale for such experiments (whose single most enjoyable example must be David Hughes’ The Little Book), but readers are likely to experience something more like an eviction than a piece of playfulness.
Rhyming Life and Death is partly a sketch of a particular psychology, though that is something that could have been managed in any number of other ways. The Author is almost oppressed by his inventions, but can’t help appropriating details from everyone he meets, a sort of metaphysical kleptomania. He has developed a dread of physical contact with strangers and imagination is his only remaining access to intimacy: “He continues to watch them and write about them so as to touch them without touching, and so that they touch him without really touching him.” Does creativity supersede the world or merely
drain it?
Any book with an unnamed writer at its center must expect to be seen as autobiographical. At first, this seems not to be the case with Rhyming Life and Death, since the Author is a few decades younger than the author, except that the book has a period (1980s) setting. The Author’s career is distinctly unspecific, except for one odd detail. He has a day job, as an accountant (though there’s no detail given about that life either). Perhaps playing the game of postmodernism is a relief from the role of compulsory conscience, which attaches to any writer in a controversial state, just as the period setting, though recent, seems a time of innocence.
When Escher produced his 1948 image of two hands drawing each other, he didn’t risk testing the viewer’s patience, but the equivalent is-it-me-or-isn’t-it? strain in postmodernism rendered even so vital a writer as Philip Roth a bit of a bore in novels of the 1980s and 1990s. Amos Oz has a light touch, but there’s no disguising the way postmodernism rewrites the contract of fiction to the apparent benefit of the writer.
Postmodernism is in some ways a theory-driven trend; in others, it represents a costly triumph over the critic. Every possible response is pre-empted, every shot fired in advance. The critic within the book analyzes “the devices the Author has used, such as the strategy of the double negative, the snares and delusions he has concealed in the lower levels of his plot,” then goes on to “the problem of credibility and reliability, which raises the fundamental question of narrative authority and, in turn, the dimension of social irony and the elusive boundary between this and self-irony …” And so on.
Intellectual engagement seems pointless when the book has already had the last word. Emotional engagement is ruled out by the shifting status of the “characters” — why step over the threshold and enter the interior spaces of the fiction, when the carpet is only there to be pulled out from under you?
Postmodernism in fiction seems to lead largely to dead ends, though Isak Dinesen with her Chinese-box structures of story within story and Borges with his labyrinths and mirrors go on testifying to the possibility of a metaphysical fiction less thoroughly armored against its audience, still attuned to the rewards of surrender.
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
The following three paragraphs are just some of what the local Chinese-language press is reporting on breathlessly and following every twist and turn with the eagerness of a soap opera fan. For many English-language readers, it probably comes across as incomprehensibly opaque, so bear with me briefly dear reader: To the surprise of many, former pop singer and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) ex-lawmaker Yu Tien (余天) of the Taiwan Normal Country Promotion Association (TNCPA) at the last minute dropped out of the running for committee chair of the DPP’s New Taipei City chapter, paving the way for DPP legislator Su
It’s hard to know where to begin with Mark Tovell’s Taiwan: Roads Above the Clouds. Having published a travelogue myself, as well as having contributed to several guidebooks, at first glance Tovell’s book appears to inhabit a middle ground — the kind of hard-to-sell nowheresville publishers detest. Leaf through the pages and you’ll find them suffuse with the purple prose best associated with travel literature: “When the sun is low on a warm, clear morning, and with the heat already rising, we stand at the riverside bike path leading south from Sanxia’s old cobble streets.” Hardly the stuff of your
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist