In the fall of 2000 I spoke at a seminar in a big US research hospital on the Internet and its impact on health care. Another participant was a senior scientist from the National Institute of Health, the US federal medical research agency. He was asked what he saw as the biggest challenge for health professionals over the next 10 years. “The biggest problem,” he replied quietly, “will be how to cope with Internet-informed patients.” The audience (mainly health professionals) laughed appreciatively and went about their daily business.
They might have been less amused if they’d realized what was going on even as the seminar was taking place. In November that year, the Pew Internet and American Life survey found that 55 percent of Americans with Internet access were using the network to get health information. At the time, that corresponded to 52 million people. Two years later the number was up to 73 million. I’m pretty sure that trend has continued. A detailed academic study some years ago estimated that 4.5 percent of all Internet searches were health-related, which at the time translated into 16.7 million health-related queries a day. Again, I’m sure that number has gone up.
All of which suggests that people worry a lot about their health and see the Web as a great way of becoming better informed. The medical profession is, to put it mildly, not over the moon. The more literate practitioners shake their heads and quote Mark Twain’s adage: “Be careful about reading health books. You may die of a misprint.” But others are more righteous and wax indignant about what they see as the errors and misinformation peddled by many sites that purport to deal with health issues.
It’s tempting to regard this as the blustering of an elite threatened with the kind of “disintermediation” that has wiped out travel agents. But quite a few studies suggest that the quality of Web health information is pretty variable. For instance, several estimate that about 5 percent of sites dealing with cancer are inaccurate, while those dealing with nutrition are especially suspect.
But there is a lot of really good stuff on the Web and many doctors see it as a force for good. It can transform patients from being passive recipients of health services and encourage them to become more active participants. And it can sometimes aid the diagnostic process, because the patient has thought more about symptoms beforehand. For those and other reasons (including excellent US resources such as www.pubmed.gov), I’ve always thought that Dr Internet was, on the whole, a good thing.
I still think that, but a report by Microsoft Research in Redmond suggests the picture is more complicated. In Cyberchondria: Studies of the Escalation of Medical Concerns in Web Search (available as a PDF download from bit.ly/15Q9h) it claims that “the Web has the potential to increase the anxieties of people with little or no medical training, especially when web search is employed as a diagnostic procedure.” The finding is based on a large-scale study of search-engine logs showing how people seek medical information online, checked against a conventional survey of 515 individuals’ health-related search experiences.
The Microsoft researchers focused on the extent to which common, probably innocuous symptoms can escalate into the perusal of Web pages on serious, rare conditions that are linked to the common symptoms. By “escalation” they mean the process by which a query about “headache” brings up a (reputable) Web page that mentions they can sometimes be symptomatic of a brain tumor (which is true). This leads to a frenzied search on topics such as “brain tumor treatment” and results in a terrified user starting to think about drawing up a will.
The research suggests search engines have the potential to escalate medical concerns. This is partly because they were never designed to be diagnostic tools and partly because reputable Web pages always provide comprehensive listings of possible diseases linked to specific symptoms. But cyberchondria is probably mainly a product of users’ predisposition to escalate rather than settle for more reasonable explanations.
The moral? If you’re a hypochondriac, stay off the Web. And remember that, as the man said, the best cure for your condition is to forget about your body and become interested in somebody else’s.
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
The following three paragraphs are just some of what the local Chinese-language press is reporting on breathlessly and following every twist and turn with the eagerness of a soap opera fan. For many English-language readers, it probably comes across as incomprehensibly opaque, so bear with me briefly dear reader: To the surprise of many, former pop singer and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) ex-lawmaker Yu Tien (余天) of the Taiwan Normal Country Promotion Association (TNCPA) at the last minute dropped out of the running for committee chair of the DPP’s New Taipei City chapter, paving the way for DPP legislator Su
It’s hard to know where to begin with Mark Tovell’s Taiwan: Roads Above the Clouds. Having published a travelogue myself, as well as having contributed to several guidebooks, at first glance Tovell’s book appears to inhabit a middle ground — the kind of hard-to-sell nowheresville publishers detest. Leaf through the pages and you’ll find them suffuse with the purple prose best associated with travel literature: “When the sun is low on a warm, clear morning, and with the heat already rising, we stand at the riverside bike path leading south from Sanxia’s old cobble streets.” Hardly the stuff of your
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist