Every hour or so, Mia Farrow gets four Google alerts relating to the search terms, "Darfur," "Central African Republic," "Eastern Chad" and "Genocide Olympics," her shorthand for China's suitability as host nation of this year's games. She is on her fourth reading of Julie Flint and Alex de Waal's primer, Darfur: A Short History of a Long War. She has been to Sudan and its neighboring countries eight times in the past five years and is planning another trip in May.
"I have no life," says Farrow, in that silvery voice that seems to self-mock and at the same time parody the expectations of those who would mock her. "This is my life. So while it may be that I'm only an actress and it may be that I'm an idiot in many aspects - but no more so than half the population - I have earned some stripes, if hours of study count. Yes, I am a celebrity, so take it with a grain. But I'm also a messenger. I'm also a witness."
Three weeks ago, her message was amplified by Steven Spielberg's decision to resign as artistic adviser to the opening ceremony in Beijing; almost a year after Farrow compared the Hollywood director to Leni Riefenstahl in an op-ed piece for the Wall Street Journal. "China," she wrote, "is bankrolling Darfur's genocide," and Spielberg was a "key collaborator" for agreeing to work with it. Since then she has written six more articles, lobbied the Olympic sponsors to tear up their contracts, offered to exchange places with an incarcerated Sudanese rebel, and urged those heads of government planning to attend the games, Gordon Brown included, to think better of it. Of Spielberg she says, "I gather he's quite annoyed with me."
Indifference is the enemy of any cause, but Farrow suffers from its opposite: the fame that gives her a platform, also prejudices how what she says is received. Even Farrow has to admit that her reputation is a little funky.
In a cafe in New York, she hauls out her laptop to show me photos taken on her last trip to Darfur and, with a smile, tells me of a dream she had in which she relocated to an underwater kingdom, was elected leader of the dolphins and had to give a presentation for which the only device that could withstand the conditions was the latest Macbook.
The UN estimates that at least 200,000 people have been killed in Darfur in the past five years in the conflict - between the government-backed Janjaweed militias and rebel groups - that has also displaced 2.5 million people. Of course, says Farrow, the blame lies squarely with Khartoum, but in line with a growing consensus in the west, she adds, Beijing has "under-written" the atrocities. China is Sudan's biggest buyer of oil. It has sold Khartoum millions of US dollars worth of weapons and has used its veto in the security council to frustrate UN action within the region.
It was a piece by Samantha Power in the New York Times that first brought Darfur to her attention. "It was just one of those jaw-dropping moments and I realized that there was a genocide ongoing in a region that I had never heard of - I started looking for information."
Before writing about him in the Wall Street Journal, Farrow sent Spielberg three letters explaining the situation and urging him to use his "unique point of leverage" to put pressure on Beijing. If he's annoyed one imagines it is owing to the parallels she drew with one of Hitler's favorite filmmakers. Some might call this intemperate.
"You think?" Farrow says, her far-away look sharpening in an instant. "Genocide is genocide. I don't equate one with the other; the Holocaust is the Holocaust and this is the Darfur genocide." The UN hasn't designated Darfur a genocide yet. "They haven't. They've called it 'atrocities of the worst kind,'" she says. "They've sidestepped the word 'genocide' because it would mandate that they go in. There is no precedent for the UN to enter a sovereign country without the permission of that government. This is a flaw with the UN."
Quincy Jones is another creative consultant to the Beijing Olympics and an old friend of hers; she has known him since she was 17 and named her youngest daughter after him. She calls him "a man of impeccable conscience" and says he has assured her that he is "trying to use his position with officials in Beijing" to get Khartoum to allow a peace keeping force of 26,000 - at the moment it is 9,000 - to enter Sudan. "I believe that he will do his best," she says. "My belief is that China will come round."
So she has at least some sympathy for what the British sport and culture secretary Tessa Jowell calls "constructive engagement" with the Chinese? No, Farrow says, too often western governments use it as a smokescreen to protect lucrative trade agreements. "You impose it over a timeline of how many are dying in Darfur. How fruitful is the engagement? One asked oneself this about Spielberg until he withdrew."
So would she have Jones boycott the event entirely? "My last e-mail from him said that he is really working hard with [the Chinese] and I said to him, just be wary of their assurances. Until we see verifiable security on the ground, don't let it slide. I would hope that at some point Quincy would withdraw if he's not satisfied with the progress."
When they were young, she took her children to meet Miep Gies, the woman who hid Anne Frank and her family from the Nazis. Farrow told them that they must ask themselves whether, in similar circumstances, they would be "prepared to do the thing that isn't safe." Farrow is a self-dramatist, but she is also a realist and when she offered to exchange places with the then-imprisoned Suleiman Jamous, a humanitarian coordinator in Darfur for the rebels, it was in the knowledge that, "realistically, I didn't think the government of Sudan would particularly want me in Kadugli. If I went, I'd be an American citizen, there'd be a lot of hoo-ha, compared to a rebel left rotting somewhere for the rest of his life. On the other hand, I had to be prepared to go."
Equally clear-sightedly, Farrow isn't advocating a boycott of the Olympics by athletes; it wouldn't be fair she says.
Corporate sponsors are another matter and she is making elaborate plans to thwart their interests. During the games she will urge US TV viewers to switch over during the commercial breaks to a channel airing her interviews from Darfur - this channel doesn't exist yet; but Farrow says it will in time for the games as well as being available online. On her Web site she directs consumers to the sponsors' main rivals.
She smiles impishly and says: "If you like Coca-Cola, try Pepsi. If you like McDonald's, you'll love Burger King.
"It's merciless but you know what? I don't care. I don't care if they lose a few million out of their gazillion. The great thing about Steven Spielberg's withdrawing his participation is that he did it through the front door, saying that it was a matter of conscience. And therefore he placed it squarely in the moral arena, leaving the sponsors very little place to hide."
As for Western leaders intending to go to the opening ceremony: "Shame on Gordon Brown I say. Because he represents the people of Great Britain. Our president has also accepted an invitation to go. I feel that - we don't care what he does next year - but this year he represents us and many of us don't want to see him take his place next to [Chinese] President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) at the genocide Olympics. He could have made it provisional, and then used the leverage."
But the game is surely bigger than this, as it was last year when Brown was accused of jeopardizing the EU-Africa summit in Lisbon by threatening a boycott if Robert Mugabe turned up.
"Clearly there's a bigger game," Farrow says, "in which the people of Darfur are simply expendable chips. One would like to have our leadership reflect that with knowledge comes responsibility. I know that sounds naive and soft, but I do believe we've gone too far in emphasizing the need for trade and economics against the cost of the value of a human life, and our own moral compass."
Farrow's great strength, and weakness, as a campaigner is that she can use the kind of emotive language a politician can't. She is a movie star with the time and financial security to pursue her charitable instincts to their fullest expression, but there is little of the self-gratification that we saw, for example, in Madonna's recent fundraiser on the lawn of the UN. It comes down, says Farrow, to a simple question of standing up to bullies. "I think you call people on things at certain points. Otherwise you create monsters. I see that even in my own business, where performers get a lot of undeserved adulation and start believing it and people stop telling them no, or telling them what is true, their reality becomes distorted."
Around her neck she wears a good luck charm given to her by a Sudanese woman named Halima, who was wearing it when her village was attacked by Janjaweed. Halima saw her husband and three of her five children bayoneted to death, says Farrow. "I believe it contains a piece of the Koran. You see everyone in Darfur wearing one, and in eastern Chad. Halima insisted that I have this, for my protection. She said tell people what is happening here: that we will all be slaughtered."
Sept.16 to Sept. 22 The “anti-communist train” with then-president Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) face plastered on the engine puffed along the “sugar railway” (糖業鐵路) in May 1955, drawing enthusiastic crowds at 103 stops covering nearly 1,200km. An estimated 1.58 million spectators were treated to propaganda films, plays and received free sugar products. By this time, the state-run Taiwan Sugar Corporation (台糖, Taisugar) had managed to connect the previously separate east-west lines established by Japanese-era sugar factories, allowing the anti-communist train to travel easily from Taichung to Pingtung’s Donggang Township (東港). Last Sunday’s feature (Taiwan in Time: The sugar express) covered the inauguration of the
The corruption cases surrounding former Taipei Mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) head Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) are just one item in the endless cycle of noise and fuss obscuring Taiwan’s deep and urgent structural and social problems. Even the case itself, as James Baron observed in an excellent piece at the Diplomat last week, is only one manifestation of the greater problem of deep-rooted corruption in land development. Last week the government announced a program to permit 25,000 foreign university students, primarily from the Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia, to work in Taiwan after graduation for 2-4 years. That number is a
In a stark demonstration of how award-winning breakthroughs can come from the most unlikely directions, researchers have won an Ig Nobel prize for discovering that mammals can breathe through their anuses. After a series of tests on mice, rats and pigs, Japanese scientists found the animals absorb oxygen delivered through the rectum, work that underpins a clinical trial to see whether the procedure can treat respiratory failure. The team is among 10 recognized in this year’s Ig Nobel awards (see below for more), the irreverent accolades given for achievements that “first make people laugh, and then make them think.” They are not
This Qing Dynasty trail takes hikers from renowned hot springs in the East Rift Valley, up to the top of the Coastal Mountain Range, and down to the Pacific Short vacations to eastern Taiwan often require choosing between the Rift Valley with its pineapple fields, rice paddies and broader range of amenities, or the less populated coastal route for its ocean scenery. For those who can’t decide, why not try both? The Antong Traversing Trail (安通越嶺道) provides just such an opportunity. Built 149 years ago, the trail linked up these two formerly isolated parts of the island by crossing over the Coastal Mountain Range. After decades of serving as a convenient path for local Amis, Han settlers, missionaries and smugglers, the trail fell into disuse once modern roadways were built