Precisely 80 years on, the Sacco-Vanzetti case still resonates like a mournful chord. Almost instantly elevated to the status of myth, the trial and execution of the anarchists Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti remains one of the blackest pages in the American national story, a cautionary tale of lethal passions fueled by political fear and ethnic prejudice.
Yet few Americans recall exactly why the two men were arrested, what went on at their trial or why emotions were stirred so powerfully around the world by the plight of two humble Italian immigrants, characterized forever by Vanzetti as "a good shoemaker and a poor fish peddler" in an interview with The New York World.
Sacco and Vanzetti, Bruce Watson's spirited history of the affair, does a great service in rescuing fact from the haze of legend and disentangling Sacco and Vanzetti from the symbols they all too quickly became. It restores immediacy to a wretched series of events that first need to be understood on their own terms.
As the Jazz Age dawned, the US was a nation gripped by fear, for reasons that feel quite contemporary. Watson begins his story in late April 1919 with an audacious act of terrorism: the mailing of 30 bombs, disguised as free samples from the Gimbels department store, to a list of prominent Americans, including John D. Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan Jr and lesser-known political figures known for suppressing radicals.
The plot failed - the bombers did not put enough postage on their packages - but shock waves rocked the country. Class war of the kind unfolding in Russia looked as if it might start up in the US, a dread reinforced by further bombings and proclamations by shadowy radical organizations that more were on the way. Watching events with grim satisfaction were two dedicated anarchist foot soldiers: Sacco, an edge trimmer at the Three-K shoe factory in Stoughton, Massachusetts, and Vanzetti, a fish peddler in nearby Plymouth. Both men belonged to the Gruppo Autonomo, an anarchist cell in East Boston that favored the violent overthrow of the government. "Sacco and Vanzetti may have been lambs, but they belonged to a wolf pack," Watson writes.
When two payroll guards were murdered in a daylight robbery in Braintree, Massachusetts, in April 1920, frantic police officers tracked down what they thought was the getaway car. Sacco and Vanzetti turned up a few nights later to claim the car, carrying loaded pistols. The police pounced. The two men would spend the next seven years in jail, protesting their innocence to the end.
No one knows what Sacco and Vanzetti were up to that night. Both told multiple lies to the police. Vanzetti later claimed that he had simply wanted to avoid naming friends and fellow anarchists. Watson, although highly sympathetic to both men and, like most historians, almost certain that they did not commit the payroll murders, points out that no one can explain what Sacco and Vanzetti were up to the night of their arrest and that, "no matter how much one wants to shout their innocence, questions remain."
They might have been preparing to collect incriminating radical literature from the houses of their associates, fearing raids as May Day approached. This was Vanzetti's explanation. Or, Watson, writes, they might have planned to hide dynamite, or to prepare for a payroll robbery.
Although the case of Sacco and Vanzetti was quickly taken up as a political cause, the trial itself was not simply, or even primarily, the crucifixion of two radicals. Although the judge, Webster Thayer, was a hidebound reactionary who despised the defendants for their political views and presided with barely concealed bias, the malicious persecution of the two men was as much a matter of bad police work and seething ethnic prejudice as anything else. The jurors, to a man, denied ever considering anarchism as a factor in their decision, and the political views of the defendants were not touched on until late in the trial, and then only vaguely.
Instead, the prosecution paraded a motley lineup of shaky eyewitnesses, most of them pressured or threatened; befuddled the jury with ambiguous ballistics reports; browbeat the many Italian witnesses who vouched for the whereabouts of the defendants on the day of the murders; and, not least, relied on the astounding incompetence of Sacco and Vanzetti's idealistic but badly overmatched lawyer. William Douglas, the Supreme Court justice, wrote in 1969 that anyone reading the courtroom transcript "will have difficulty believing that the trial with which it deals took place in the US."
Once convicted, Sacco and Vanzetti, in a sense, became the property of their supporters and their vilifiers. They provided a noble cause for what the Boston Globe called "the sob sisters, pacifists and Reds." For ordinary Americans, terrified by waves of immigrants, political radicals and the rise of militant labor, they were evil incarnate.
The case, Watson argues, defined a new American fault line. "Opinions on their guilt or innocence soon separated sophisticate from 'rube,' liberal from conservative and those who feared authority from those who implicitly trusted cops, judges and juries."
Watson devotes some of his most compelling pages to the long, anguished and ultimately hopeless campaign to rally support for the condemned men, to unearth new evidence and to chip away at the smooth facade of injustice. Pleas, motions and appeals proved futile. The judicial system, forming a perfect circle, simply ratified its own errors. At one point, the state's Supreme Judicial Court decided that Thayer himself should rule on a legal writ accusing him of bias in the case. "Prejudice?" he declared from the bench. "There isn't any now and there never was at any time."
Outside Boston, as far away as Buenos Aires and Berlin, millions of eyes saw things differently. Watson sums it up eloquently. "In the judgment of the watching world," he writes, "one American city would stand for America itself, one court case for the universal dream of fairness, two men for all men staring into the naked face of power."
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
The following three paragraphs are just some of what the local Chinese-language press is reporting on breathlessly and following every twist and turn with the eagerness of a soap opera fan. For many English-language readers, it probably comes across as incomprehensibly opaque, so bear with me briefly dear reader: To the surprise of many, former pop singer and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) ex-lawmaker Yu Tien (余天) of the Taiwan Normal Country Promotion Association (TNCPA) at the last minute dropped out of the running for committee chair of the DPP’s New Taipei City chapter, paving the way for DPP legislator Su
It’s hard to know where to begin with Mark Tovell’s Taiwan: Roads Above the Clouds. Having published a travelogue myself, as well as having contributed to several guidebooks, at first glance Tovell’s book appears to inhabit a middle ground — the kind of hard-to-sell nowheresville publishers detest. Leaf through the pages and you’ll find them suffuse with the purple prose best associated with travel literature: “When the sun is low on a warm, clear morning, and with the heat already rising, we stand at the riverside bike path leading south from Sanxia’s old cobble streets.” Hardly the stuff of your
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist