Skip Snow, a federal biologist in Everglades National Park, would love to spend his days monitoring the dizzying array of native wildlife across this 607,000-hectare "river of grass" west of the ever-expanding Miami metropolis.
Lately, however, he has been spending ever more time studying the remains of the park's birds and animals, extracted from the stomachs of captured or road-killed Burmese pythons, the latest - and most spectacular - addition to Florida's growing list of biological interlopers.
Opening a packed freezer in a park laboratory, Snow sifted dated plastic bags containing fur, feathers, bones and other vestiges of recent python prey.
PHOTOS: NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE
"We've found everything, from very small mammals - native cotton mice, native cotton rats, rabbits, squirrels, possums, raccoons, even a bobcat, most recently the hooves of a deer," Snow said. "Wading birds and water birds, pipe-billed grebes, coots, egrets, limpkins and at least one big alligator."
The South Asian snakes, which can top 90kg and 6m, probably entered the park as discards or escapees from the bustling global trade in exotic pets. Year-old, 30cm-long pythons are a popular US$70 item at reptile fairs and on the Web but in a few years can reach room-spanning, cat-munching size, prompting some owners to abandon them by the roadside. That practice may not pose an ecological problem in Detroit, Snow said, but in a near-tropical Florida park, it is an unfolding nightmare.
Some very rough estimates put the state's pet python population above 5,000. More than 350 have been found in the park since 2002, with others showing up in mangroves along Florida's west coast and farther north in the state. There are perhaps 10 more for every one that is seen, Snow said.
Last May, biologists confirmed that Everglades pythons were not a transient curiosity when they found the first eggs. "There were 46 eggs, 44 fertile," Snow said. Shortly afterward, they found another clutch of two dozen, already hatched.
Signs abound, he said, that the pythons are still colonizing new terrain. "This is a species that is really made for invading."
Snow and other wildlife biologists have been on something of a crusade of late, pressing federal and state governments to crack down on the trade in such species, quicken responses when an invader appears in the wild and expand federal preventive screening to identify - ahead of time - imported animals and plants that are most apt to spread in this country.
While there is a National Invasive Species Council whose membership includes cabinet-level officials, the grunt work of preventive species screening is done by a handful of biologists at the Fish and Wildlife Service, the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Health and Human Services.
The vast majority of the US$1 billion or so the government spends each year on invasive species goes to managing existing problems, with about 10 percent, according to a recent government report, going to prevention. In the meantime, the government estimates that invasive species cost the economy US$100 billion a year.
The python may be a marquee-quality "spokes-snake" for invasive species, Snow said, but it is hardly alone in its potential - once established - to disrupt ecosystems and pose a possible threat to people and the economy. Along with hundreds of accidental immigrants like zebra mussels, there have been innumerable intentionally imported plants and animals that have become vexing, expensive problems. Once they are noticed, it is almost always too late, or too costly, to eradicate them, experts say.
Still, such species tend to become a priority only after the fact, biologists say. It was not until this year that a new Florida law established a list of six "reptiles of concern" (including the python). The state will soon require US$100-a-year owners' permits and the insertion of identifying microchips under the skin of the purchased pets.
This year, the South Florida Water Management District petitioned the federal Fish and Wildlife Service to add Burmese pythons to a list of "injurious wildlife" maintained under the 107-year-old Lacey Act.
David Lodge, the director of the Center for Aquatic Conservation at the University of Notre Dame, has been an author on a series of recent studies of the issue, including a position paper last year from the Ecological Society of America pressing for much stronger federal investment and action.
"When it comes to importing live organisms, our policies are entirely reactive," Lodge said. "It's as if in the drug realm we were to allow any new drug or food product on the market until it kills someone and then consider a regulation to ban it."
With invasive species, though, the situation is actually potentially worse, he said, because banning them after the fact does not eliminate the threat.
As Snow put it, "Invasives are the gift that keeps on giving, because of the biological imperative to reproduce."
While Snow is hunting whatever pythons he can find and pushing for new laws and more money for preventive programs, he is also working at the grassroots level.
In frequent slide presentations to community groups, he pulls no punches, describing how the snakes seize prey with small sharp teeth and suffocate it with muscular coils. There are several recorded deaths of pet owners in the US strangled or suffocated by pythons.
One slide says: "Do you really want a snake that may grow more than 6m long or weigh 90kg, urinate and defecate like a horse, live more than 25 years and for whom you will have to kill mice, rats and, eventually, rabbits?"
Taiwan’s overtaking of South Korea in GDP per capita is not a temporary anomaly, but the result of deeper structural problems in the South Korean economy says Chang Young-chul, the former CEO of Korea Asset Management Corp. Chang says that while it reflects Taiwan’s own gains, it also highlights weakening growth momentum in South Korea. As design and foundry capabilities become more important in the AI era, Seoul risks losing competitiveness if it relies too heavily on memory chips. IMF forecasts showing Taiwan widening its lead over South Korea have fueled debate in Seoul over memory chip dependence, industrial policy and
“China wants to unify with Taiwan at the lowest possible cost, and it currently believes that unification will become easier and less costly as time passes,” wrote Amanda Hsiao (蕭嫣然) and Bonnie Glaser in Foreign Affairs (“Why China Waits”) this month, describing how the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is playing the long game in its quest to seize Taiwan. This has been a favorite claim of many writers over the years, easy to argue because it is so trite. Very obviously, if the PRC isn’t attacking Taiwan, it is waiting. But for what? Hsiao and Glaser’s main point is trivial,
May 18 to May 24 Gathered on Yangtou Mountain (羊頭山) on Dec. 5, 1972, Taiwan’s hiking enthusiasts formally declared the formation of the “100 Peaks Club” (百岳俱樂部) and unveiled the final list of mountains. Famed mountaineer Lin Wen-an (林文安) led this effort for the Chinese Alpine Association (中華山岳協會). Working with other experienced climbers, he chose 100 peaks above 10,000 feet (3,048m) that featured triangulation points and varied in difficulty and character. The list sparked an alpine hiking craze, inspiring many to take up mountaineering and competing to “conquer” the summits. A common misconception is that the 100 Peaks represent Taiwan’s 100 tallest
And so, in the wake of US President Donald Trump’s trip to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), all the experts on the Strait of Hormuz suddenly became experts on US-China-Taiwan relations. The Internet has certainly expanded human knowledge. Lots of these sudden experts made noise this week about Trump’s words after the meeting with PRC dictator Xi Jin-ping (習近平). Trump is going to sell out Taiwan! Longtime Taiwan commentator J. Michael Cole summed the situation up neatly in the Guardian: “We need to keep in mind that he has a tendency to say many things — sometimes contradicting himself within