Bertolt Brecht is one of the pre-eminent playwrights of the 20th century because he created a type of theater that was meant to provoke reflection based on reason rather than a visceral identification with the action on stage — something he felt left audiences complacent. For Brecht, this complacency left audiences ill equipped to deal with the troubles that pervade society; problems that he felt theater should address head on.
So Crazy Theater's (瘋狂劇場) production of The Caucasian Chalk Circle this weekend at The Crown Theater (皇冠藝文中心小劇場) is a considerable challenge. The play makes blatant attacks on religion, injustice and social inequality, and the themes that Brecht wrote so lucidly about half a century ago should still resonate, especially considering recent political events and the ongoing reforms of the legal system in Taiwan. But the question is, will they?
Producer William Wang (王瑋廉) and director Chou Li-de (周力德) have been students of Brecht for at least a decade, and bring their considerable insight into Brecht's ideas to the production. The name of the theater troupe also reflects their ideological commitment, drawing as it does from ideas expounded in Roland Barthes' Camera Lucida. Wang said that while Barthes talked about the need to make images inert to avoid the "madness" caused by the unreality of the thing represented, they conversely push toward madness to help them better understand society and stage better plays.
PHOTOS COURTESY OF CRAZY THEATER
The Caucasian Chalk Circle takes its name and part of its story from the book of a opera written during the Yuan Dynasty by Li Xing-dao (李行道). Brecht creates a play within a play, with the primary action taking place in the Caucasus Mountains of Georgia after WWII, where two groups of peasants gather in a valley to argue over which should claim the valley as their own. Under a government agency, it is decided that the land should go to the group who will put it to best use. A story is then recalled that 250 years previously a woman lost her daughter to the ravages of war and then tried to reclaim her from the maid that saved her.
As with Brecht's original productions, Crazy Theater does not use one actor for each part. Instead, eight actors play the role of 25 characters. Like the actors, the props and the set serve many functions the purpose of which, according to Wang, is to show the multifaceted nature of any object. So as with every actor playing different roles, each prop or set will have many functions. This of course plays into the theme of the multifaceted nature of justice.
The ideas of judgment should resonate with many Taiwanese because much of society's institutions and ideas are still based on tradition, which, according to Wang, can be a barrier to creating a civil society. With a translation into modern Chinese by Perng Ching-hsi (彭鏡禧), professor of modern languages at NTU, the audience should walk out of the theater with plenty to discuss. At least this is what Brecht would have hoped for.
Has the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) changed under the leadership of Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌)? In tone and messaging, it obviously has, but this is largely driven by events over the past year. How much is surface noise, and how much is substance? How differently party founder Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) would have handled these events is impossible to determine because the biggest event was Ko’s own arrest on multiple corruption charges and being jailed incommunicado. To understand the similarities and differences that may be evolving in the Huang era, we must first understand Ko’s TPP. ELECTORAL STRATEGY The party’s strategy under Ko was
Before the recall election drowned out other news, CNN last month became the latest in a long line of media organs to report on abuses of migrant workers in Taiwan’s fishing fleet. After a brief flare of interest, the news media moved on. The migrant worker issues, however, did not. CNN’s stinging title, “Taiwan is held up as a bastion of liberal values. But migrant workers report abuse, injury and death in its fishing industry,” was widely quoted, including by the Fisheries Agency in its response. It obviously hurt. The Fisheries Agency was not slow to convey a classic government
It’s Aug. 8, Father’s Day in Taiwan. I asked a Chinese chatbot a simple question: “How is Father’s Day celebrated in Taiwan and China?” The answer was as ideological as it was unexpected. The AI said Taiwan is “a region” (地區) and “a province of China” (中國的省份). It then adopted the collective pronoun “we” to praise the holiday in the voice of the “Chinese government,” saying Father’s Day aligns with “core socialist values” of the “Chinese nation.” The chatbot was DeepSeek, the fastest growing app ever to reach 100 million users (in seven days!) and one of the world’s most advanced and
It turns out many Americans aren’t great at identifying which personal decisions contribute most to climate change. A study recently published by the National Academy of Sciences found that when asked to rank actions, such as swapping a car that uses gasoline for an electric one, carpooling or reducing food waste, participants weren’t very accurate when assessing how much those actions contributed to climate change, which is caused mostly by the release of greenhouse gases that happen when fuels like gasoline, oil and coal are burned. “People over-assign impact to actually pretty low-impact actions such as recycling, and underestimate the actual carbon
RSS