Sun, May 07, 2006 - Page 19 News List

The planet pays dearly for wedding ceremonies

By Lucy Siegle  /  THE GUARDIAN , LONDON

The typical wedding ceremony in Britain produces around 14.5 tons of carbon dioxide.

PHOTO: NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE

Like the flutter of confetti, the wedding season will soon be showered with surveys on the extor-tionate price of today's nuptials.

However, I can non-exclusively reveal that last year's figures priced the cost of the average wedding in Britain at US$31,000. Furthermore, the happy day takes its toll on the planet, contributing around 14.5 tons of carbon dioxide per event.

As nobody wants to put a damper on proceedings by lingering on the fiscal and ecological fallout, offering up your wedding list to a higher purpose other than the continuing accumulation of consumer goods seems like a good trade-off. After all, in an age when the average household collects around 90 appliances, frankly, who needs another toaster or kettle?

The lite-green (if not pistachio) thing to do is to have an eco-themed list, featuring fairly traded kitchen utensils and organic duvets. But really the true `ethical' list is the alternative charity list, where guests fork out for library books, goats or beehives to be donated, on their behalf, to communities, usually in the developing world.

A herd of goats, for example, provides milk, more goats and meat. So, in effect, these are gifts that keep on giving and, not surprisingly, they have been a huge hit. However, because the lists trade on ingenuity (such as donating redundant Kalashnikovs, converted by local metalworkers into farm implements), you should expect some confusion from guests hell bent on giving you champagne flutes.

Neither is the new breed of ethical gift list contention free. Some people question the wisdom of parachuting (metaphorically speaking) livestock into impoverished or drought-stricken areas where they can become just one more mouth to feed.

However, so far there is little evidence of such negative impact and plenty of positive feedback. But this comes with the proviso that you open a list with one or more of the main operators -- such as World Vision, which runs the Alternative Gift Catalogue (www.greatgifts.org) and, incidentally, claims to have been the originator of the `charity goat.' Last year alone it sold 22,614 goats. Similarly, there's Oxfam Unwrapped (www.oxfamunwrapped.com), which has just launched a new-look wedding catalogue, and Good Gifts (www.goodgifts.org), an adjunct of the Charities Advisory Trust, which does a good line in supplying goats to war widows in Rwanda, for example. All of these projects are run by, or in conjunction with, development experts.

Don't expect to please everybody back at home, though. Some of your guests may subscribe to the view that the alternative list is just another way of displacing frenzied Western consumerism. The truly sustainable wedding list, they might argue, is the one with nothing on it.

According to research by the Charities Aid Foundation, women between the ages of 35 to 44, and 55 to 64 are more likely to contri-bute to charity than men. So, if you're still determined to raise enough for solar panels for a mobile clinic (US$10,400, World Vision), you might want to aim your invites at this particular guest demographic.

This story has been viewed 2159 times.
TOP top