Joseph Dan sets himself an imposing task in Kabbalah: A Very Short Introduction. In a little more than 100 pages, he races through more than a thousand years of Jewish religious texts, explaining a vast, amorphous body of beliefs and practices that have influenced Freemasons, Hasidim, Carl Jung, New Age gurus and, more recently, Hollywood celebrities. It's quite a performance, carried off with only a few stumbles.
"There is hardly a Jewish idea that cannot be described as `kabbal-istic' with some justification," writes Dan, a professor of kabbalah at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. The subject is elusive, and kabbal-istic thought has taken so many twists and turns over the centuries that it makes more sense, Dan argues, to speak of kabbalahs, in the plural. In a sardonic aside, he offers a popular definition of the kabbalah as "something that I have a vague notion of, but somebody,
somewhere, knows exactly what it means."
To clarify, Dan begins at the beginning, on Mount Sinai, where Moses received the word of God in the Torah. The word kabbalah comes from the Hebrew for receive (in Israel it identifies the reception desk in every hotel and the receipt in every restaurant). For a thousand years, Dan writes, when Jews referred to the kabbalah, they meant the divine truth revealed to Moses.
In the Middle Ages, however, Jewish scholars in Spain and Provence, and somewhat later in Italy, claimed to possess secret scriptural knowledge that origin-ated with Moses and was passed down orally through the centuries. These scholars and exegetes, later known as kabbalists, dealt especially with two sections of the Torah whose public discussion is forbidden by the Talmud, the collection of ancient rabbinic writings on Jewish law and tradition followed by Orthodox Jews. The first, from Genesis, describes the creation of the world; the second, from the Book of Ezekiel, describes Ezekiel's vision of the celestial chariot.
Over the centuries, the kabbalists, incorporating ideas first expressed in nonkabbalistic treatises dating from late antiquity, worked out a complex interpretation of the divine order and its creation. They described the kingdom of heaven and, in a few treatises, explained how humans can ascend to "face God in his glory."
Medieval kabbalists envisioned a universe arranged hierarchically in 10 divine emanations, called sefirot, and developed numerical, alphabetical and metaphorical correspondences among them. These esoteric systems and the magical aspects of the kabbalah captured the imagination of Christian Renaissance thinkers like Pico della Mirandola. The idea of kabbalists as a dangerous secret cult lies behind the English word cabal.
Dan helpfully sorts out the most influential kabbalistic concepts, especially the notion that individual human actions can influence the divine order and bring about the tikkun, or redemption. This radical proposition was put forward by Isaac Luria, a 16th-century kabbalist, who believed that the universe was born in crisis,
resulting in a system of divine emanations riven by fault lines. Only by strict observance of religious law could the Jews bring about their own redemption and correct the flaws in the universe, ridding it of evil. This idea gained tremendous force, and, Dan writes, "penetrated all aspects of Jewish culture." It remains central to ultra-orthodox Judaism today.
One large point remains obscure. Dan insists that the kabbalah is not mystical. The very concept of mysticism, he argues, is alien to Judaism and Islam. Yet he freely uses the term throughout the book. This is confusing. And his discussion of current kabbalistic thinking is rushed.
In Riddles of Existence, Earl Conee and Theodore Sider, forming a metaphysical tag team, throw themselves at 10 perennial
problems in philosophy. In brief chapters, the authors, both philosophy professors, pose a question (Does God exist? What is time?) and then explain, for a general audience, different ways of answering it. They offer a series of hors d'oeuvres for intellectual diners not quite ready to commit to a full philosophical meal.
There are no answers. Or rather, there are too many answers. The entertainment value lies in picking one's way through ingenious arguments, encountering along the way basic ideas like the law of the excluded middle and the principle of sufficient reason.
Conee and Sider like to start with a common-sense, real-life question -- Why is the person in my baby picture the same as the person I see in the mirror today? -- and then pick apart the comfortable assumptions that carry most of us through life.
Although both authors write clearly and simply, the waters do get deep very quickly. Most readers will pause, if only briefly, when faced with formulations like "any condition is a necessary condition for itself," but help is usually forthcoming, often in the form of humble examples. "Ontological dependence" sounds forbidding, but Conee, in his chapter on God, comes to the rescue with an irresistible invitation: "Consider a tuna salad sandwich." Two slices of bread do not make a tuna salad sandwich, and neither does a heap of tuna salad, but together they do. Voila! Ontological dependence on rye.
Last week, Viola Zhou published a marvelous deep dive into the culture clash between Taiwanese boss mentality and American labor practices at the Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC) plant in Arizona in Rest of World. “The American engineers complained of rigid, counterproductive hierarchies at the company,” while the Taiwanese said American workers aren’t dedicated. The article is a delight, but what it is depicting is the clash between a work culture that offers employee autonomy and at least nods at work-life balance, and one that runs on hierarchical discipline enforced by chickenshit. And it runs on chickenshit because chickenshit is a cultural
My previous column Donovan’s Deep Dives: The powerful political force that vanished from the English press on April 23 began with three paragraphs of what would be to most English-language readers today incomprehensible gibberish, but are very typical descriptions of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) internal politics in the local Chinese-language press. After a quiet period in the early 2010s, the English press stopped writing about the DPP factions, the factions changed and eventually local English-language journalists could not reintroduce the subject without a long explanation on the context that would not fit easily in a typical news article. That previous
April 29 to May 5 One month before the Taipei-Keelung New Road (北基新路) was set to open, the news that US general Douglas MacArthur had died, reached Taiwan. The military leader saw Taiwan as an “unsinkable aircraft carrier” that was of huge strategic value to the US. He’d been a proponent of keeping it out of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) hands. Coupled with the fact that the US had funded more than 50 percent of the road’s construction costs, the authorities at the last minute renamed it the MacArthur Thruway (麥帥公路) for his “great contributions to the free world and deep
Years ago, I was thrilled when I came across a map online showing a fun weekend excursion: a long motorcycle ride into the mountains of Pingtung County (屏東) going almost up to the border with Taitung County (台東), followed by a short hike up to a mountain lake with the mysterious name of “Small Ghost Lake” (小鬼湖). I shared it with a more experienced hiking friend who then proceeded to laugh. Apparently, this road had been taken out by landslides long before and was never going to be fixed. Reaching the lake this way — or any way that would